Mission 775 Floorstanding Speakers
Mission 775 Floorstanding Speakers
[Jul 16, 1999]
Thomas
an Audio Enthusiast
I liked the Mission 774 a good amount, so I thought I'd try out the Mission 775s. There are a lot of good things about them, but the bad is what keeps me from being a owner. |
[Aug 01, 1999]
Tim
an Audio Enthusiast
I just purchased the 775s. I listened to both 774s and 775s. I truly liked them equally. Both had a great range and the 775's supported the lower frequencies well. I planned on buying the 774s because of price. I went back to the dealer the next day. He sold the last pair of 774s but gave me the 775s at the same price, so I really couldn't complain. I also have a Mission center channel, sub, and surround speakers. I am very satisfied with the entire Mission product. |
[Dec 15, 1999]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Beautiful cabinets and styling
Weakness:
Very directional I love these speakers. Placed appropriately, these speakers have more than adequate bass. Good imaging. They are very smooth from top to bottom. They require no adjustments by the pre-amp. They sound best when all tone controls are bypassed. I compared them to the NHT 2.5's and found them to be a comparable sound, but got a much better deal on the 775s. System used: Rotel RB-951 amp, NAD 1600 pre-amp, Parasound cd/x88 cd-player, monster cable interconnects and speaker cables. |
[Aug 16, 1999]
Alex
an Audio Enthusiast
I was actually considering the 774's because of the price.But when I learned (thanks to Tom here) that Bryn Mawr Stereo is going to stop selling them and dropping the price because of that I got the 775's instead. |
[Mar 18, 2001]
Greg
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Tonal balance, midrange, bass reponse, cabinet quality
Weakness:
Current hungry. small sweet spot. The strongest endorsement I can give these speakers is this -- I am listening to my system twice as much as I was before I purchased them. Similar Products Used: JBL L60t, Magnepan MGa |
[Mar 18, 2001]
Greg
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Tonal balance, midrange, bass reponse, cabinet quality
Weakness:
Current hungry. small sweet spot. The strongest endorsement I can give these speakers is this -- I am listening to my system twice as much as I was before I purchased them. Similar Products Used: JBL L60t, Magnepan MGa |
[Oct 07, 1999]
Alex
an Audio Enthusiast
This is a comeback.I just wanted to update visitors on my experience with these speakers. |
[Mar 28, 2001]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clarity, transparent sound
Weakness:
Directional The main point I would like to make is: these speakers must be broken in. After about 80 hours they sound much better than they do new. Also, while they are relatively efficient speakers, they like power and the use of high quality cables and bi-wiring really helps the sound quality. Use of sub-par cables (and subpar amp) will lead to reduced bass quality. If you use a quality amp and cable, these speakers produce more than enough bass. Also, placement of the speakers makes a great deal of difference (as pointed out in the owner's manual). Experiment with how far away from the walls you place them. Positioning the speakers so they slightly point inward sounds best in my listening room. Similar Products Used: NHT 2.0 |
[Sep 23, 1999]
MistaGreg
an Audio Enthusiast
Boy did I want to like these speakers. In the store they had an incredible soundstage. The instruments are all right there in front of you. But, the low end is terrible. In low to moderate listening levels they are great. But if you ever want to open them up. the 6.5 woofer won't come with you. They will pop and waffle. For 2k you can do better. I even added a sub and but it wasn't worth the trouble to get the system to blend. After 3 months I gave up and went for the Mirage OM-6 for 1k more. Now these are high end speakers. |
[Sep 18, 2000]
Barry
Audio Enthusiast
|