Mission 782 Floorstanding Speakers
Mission 782 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 17, 2020]
mikeyc38
Strength:
Purchased these in 2006/7 and enjoyed them ever since. These speakers need a good amp so I started with an Audiolab 8000s and Marantz CD-63Ki-Sig using a musical fidelity X-10d line conditioner. Wide open soundstage sweet treble and clear mid-range. Then I added an 8000SX power amp and biamped the setup. WOW, power, extension and dynamics of a high order. In fact the system does not sound loud when you turn the volume up - only more dynamics and powerful bass! Weakness:
The original mid-range units fail after a while. But if you replace them with Audax HM130Z0 or Z12 you will restore the sound to better-than-original Price Paid: £700
Purchased: New
Model Year: 2006
|
[Sep 26, 2019]
callum
Strength:
The 782 is top notch. It has better midrange definition than my other harbeth shl5+. The highs from its tweeter is silky, very detailed. Low Bass note is exemplary comparable to my other floorstanders twice its size! I have yet to find another pair of speakers that could play all genre of music well like the 782 could , that could be the reason why it stayed with me for the last 15yrs Weakness:
none, the wood exterior and drivers are perfect even till this day! Price Paid: 700
Purchased: New
Model Year: 2004
|
[Aug 22, 2018]
mribeiro
Strength:
Biliiant Speakers They can go up against speakers costing 5 or 6 times as much. The original desing was to be used with AUDAX aerogel, but a change to keraform as a supplier created a quality problem. They seem equal to the audax, but they will all fail in time. My opinion, buy them cheap, already failed and then invest the same amount of money in the mid-range drivers form audax. Use my guide and repair them (just google 782 repair and you will find my post). You need to weare the new drivers in for 40 to 50 hours, and also properly place and tilt the speakers to your room. The side firing bass NEEDS to use your walls as relfextion... so you will need to play with them for a bit until you get them right. Then enjoy and smile while others are spending 5k on speakers with a similar experience :) Weakness:
The original keraform midrange HAS TO GO and be replaced by AUDAX drivers. Price Paid: 250 (120 for the speakers
Purchased: Used
|
[Feb 20, 2016]
Manuel Ribeiro
Audio Enthusiast
I've been reading most reviews here... All are important as bit by bit they all make quite a story.
|
[Mar 30, 2014]
David Tudor
Audio Enthusiast
Whilst i have had to change the woofers and tweeters I think the items I've replaced them with are much better quality than the originals and look as if they last.
|
[Jan 19, 2011]
huyoo
Audio Enthusiast
I brought the speaker for around $650 for a second hand
|
[Aug 10, 2009]
PhilNZ
Casual Listener
I bought my 782's second hand in London, after getting some Mission 780 bookshelf speakers at a Hi Fi show in Bristol. I loved the sound of the 780's and wanted to expand the set to become my Home Cinema / Listening room setup.
|
[Jun 07, 2009]
turist
Audio Enthusiast
I have owned these speakers from new for atleast 5 years. I have when the speakers where working liked the sound they produced. I have not over powered these speakers either by amp species 100wpc or have I listened to them too hard, the truth of the matter is. The midrange speakers DO have a FAULT, I also noticed another reviewer noted the same issue. I have replaced multiple sets at my own expense. Now, at the moment with them not working once again I have no choice but to consider replacing the speaker units for another brand. The anoying thing is that these speakers came highly recommended but if I had to evaluate my listening pleasure for my buck, these speakers are I feel greatly over priced. Also after being told by a supplier that the midrange speakers do have a fault I emailed the new Australian importer with my issues, after resending the message twice got a email back saying that they can supply replacement midrange speakers at the standard cost, YES very helpful. I am not one to write reviews on items that have not impressed me, actually this is my first. But in this case I felt an obligation to fellow users of these types of reviews to assess whether or not they should buy these speakers and my advice for you is simple " BUY THESE SPEAKERS AT YOUR OWN RISK"
|
[Aug 13, 2007]
biggsound50
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
beautiful spkr and great mid range .superb clarity in acustics and vocals.
Weakness:
the bass units are to low to the floor, and dont like pure class a amps with a lot of current to spare. i agree to an extent with northerner,, the 782's are a bit bassy!.especially as im driving them with a mf 1000a which as i've found out dont like low positioned bass speakers. nore need them. in fact it was more controlled with my tannoy e11's although they could not keep up. ive decided to move to a pair of quad 21l's. which having heard on a rotel amp which was very modern and light felt a little weak on bass. i'm hoping the mix will be a 'proper job'.by the way, the musical fidelity 1000a is amazing.no many amps can destroy missions, but these do.probably the best amp ever built bar none.the 782 spkrs are very good though, i tried them with a mates quad amp and they sounded much better. |
[Jun 12, 2006]
Northener
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Build Quality
Weakness:
Tonal cohesion
I was looking for a sonic upgrade to my trust-worthy KEF Q35.2's, which have served me well over the last 6 years. My system comprises of a CYRUS III Amp, Marantz CD63 MKII KI SIG CD player hooked up with QED Biwire. I was looking for an advancement in soundstage, bass response, treble quality and overall musicality. I've been wanting some Miission 780se's for a while now and when I saw a pair of 782's in perfect condition for the same price (320 Euros), I took a leap of faith. Having heard the 780's and been mightily impressed with their weight and scale, I thought I'd be getting more of the same only with maybe a dollop of low end extention. I got more than I bargained for.
Similar Products Used: KEF Q35.2 (Sighhh...)
|