Monitor Audio Silver RS6 Floorstanding Speakers
Monitor Audio Silver RS6 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 17, 2006]
ron411
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
everything
Weakness:
none at all After listning to a bunch of diffrent speakers i would come back to the RS6.
|
[Jul 21, 2006]
wlawson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very clear, detailed and natural sound
Weakness:
The occasional recording might sound slightly forward but not a real problem I decided that it was time to upgrade my 7-year-old Tannoy Revolution R2 speakers. These speakers are very good but I always felt at times that they didn’t have enough punch, although the bass could go quite deep. I had my eyes on Monitor Audio speakers for quite some time, starting with the Silver 8i’s about 3 years ago but kept putting off the purchase because I wasn’t sure if I wanted to spend 700 pounds. Then I had a look at the Silver S range and again I waited and waited …. until now. The RS range changed that, notably the RS6’s. I had read a couple of professional reviews and they found it difficult to fault these speakers without being picky. I decided to find a place where I could audition these speakers. The speakers are well built and attractive with excellent finishes. I must say that when I listened to them in the listening room, they sounded very good but not fantastic. The midrange was very clear and detailed, and the treble was nice. The bass was fast and punchy but not as deep as I expected. I wasn’t sure if the lack of depth in the bottom end was because of the Cyrus amp that was being used but, because everything else was impressive and bearing in mind what other reviewers have said, I decided to buy them.
Similar Products Used: Tannoy Revolution R2 speakers |
[Jul 19, 2006]
kutz
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very clean and punchy bass (great for percussion)
Weakness:
Poor recordings are revealed & some notes can sound harsh due to the revealing detail of the speaker (however this is no fault of speaker)
I first heard these speakers in the store and wasn't all that impressed. I thought they were bright, sterile and at times harsh probably due to the mismatched electronics they were connected to. It wasn't till my dealer let me audition these speakers at home for the weekend and I discovered how good the RS6's were. I used an Arcam AVR300 and found that this was a winning combination. From then on, I was sold.
Similar Products Used: Totem forest, hawks, staaf, mites
|
[Jul 13, 2006]
antero
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
noted above
Weakness:
noted above My views as compared to the first two reviewer likely reflect a difference in tastes. I have heard the RS6's in a moderate hi-fi setup with B&K electronics (their top of the line) and A/B'd them directly against the Gold Reference 60's which were definitely better in all respects. Yes, in all respects!
Customer Service Did not experience any problems with MA speakers so I can't comment. Similar Products Used: Dynaudio, B&w, Martin Logan, Mordaunt Short, Revelation Audio, Tannoy, Maggies, Energy Veritas, Paradigm, JAS, PMC, ....+ many others less memorable. |
[Feb 22, 2006]
joe perry
AudioPhile
Strength:
midrange toe tappin great sound bass is quick and suprisingly punchy and deep vocals the ability to disappear ans soundstage well fit and finish and real wood veneer is stellar for the price and not out of place when compared to the 2000 dollar more proac studio 140 great speaker for small to medium room large room might require a small rel sub
Weakness:
no weaknesses for the money actually better than the rs8 - read absolute sound from what i can tell equal to anything in the 3000 price range with the type of music i listen to (coldplay , floyd , mark knopfler) although i have not had a chance to listen to the new monitor audio gold signature gs20 those should be better for 2000 dollars more but how much better??????? wanted to replace my large black psb stratus golds with a smaller and more efficient speaker that had a rangle of real wood veneers such as rosenut ot cherry would have been happy with a speaker that equalled the sound of my old speakers but i got a much better speaker for not much more than i sold my used 10 year old speakers most of my comments are just as enthusiastic as the previous reviewer go to mafocus.co.uk or read the march 2006 stereophile Similar Products Used: was willing to spend more but was equal to the new proac studio series , jas oscar , b&w 704 , similar priced kefs , energy reference connoiseurs , totem forests all of these except for the kefs were more money(sometimes much more) but it seemed that the extra money was put into super smooth finishes and not sound quality if i had the room though - which i never will my dream speaker is the dunlavy scIVA but i can live with the rs6 quite happily |
[Jan 05, 2006]
RaymondHayter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Transparent. Overall sound - transparent and well balanced. Deep, tight bass. Attractive, well built enclosures.
Weakness:
I don't listen to my KEF Q65s as much as before... I'd give these speakers 6/5 if I could. They're absolutely superb. I've listened to many other speakers in a similar price range: KEF, Polk Audio, Tannoy, Mission, Image, etc and IMO, the MA RS6's are significantly superior. There are 2 defining characteristics: They have bags of bass (good, musical, tight bass not overbearing woolley bass), and the speakers are very fast - attack transients are much crisper on these speakers than most others I've heard. These speakers are also versatile: They are delicate and transparent with Williams'classical guitar or Bill Evans' piano. They're deep and full with Enya or Jean-Michel Jarre, and they rock the house with Pink Floyd or Queen. The RS6's big brother, the RS8s sound very similar. They have deeper bass again and you'd need a large room to do them justice. You owe it to yourself to have a listen to the RS6s. Similar Products Used: KEF Q55, Q65 |