NHT SuperSub Floorstanding Speakers
NHT SuperSub Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jul 05, 2002]
Shane Burton
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Finish, build, performance
Weakness:
For it's size, none. This sub is great for the price I paid. Very musical. Solid build. Perfect for the living room. Similar Products Used: Velodyne |
[Oct 26, 2000]
bill
Audiophile
Strength:
setup flexibility, musical accuracy
Weakness:
none of the lowest lows bought the super sub and super zero's as a package; a wage earners class "c" full range and was not disappointed. I was particularly drawn to the variable crossover and audio/video switching. The best recommendation for the supersub is that on pop, electric bass becomes a musical instrument, not just percussion (thump, thump). On classical, double bass and cello are distinct instruments which adds to the illusion of the soundstage. And tympani, oh boy! I spent little time fussing with the setup, very easy to integrate. Even when i forget to switch to video, movie explosions are right there. The unit does "double" on the THX logo sound (i heard somewhere it has 16 cycle tones), but what do you want for under $500.Highly recommended for the fiscally challenged audiophile. Similar Products Used: velodyne, planar hybrids |
[Mar 07, 2001]
Hersch
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Wonderful musical sound, excellent fit and finsih, great maunual, great build quality.
Weakness:
Not the biggest baddest sound for movies, but pretty darn good I purchased this product to replace my Monitor Audio ASW 100 sub. They both have a $500 MSRP, but that's where the similarities end. This fit, finish and build quailty of the unit is second to none. No, its not solid rosewood like the furniture grade Theils, but its darn good for under 1000 bucks. I was a bit nervouse about the ability of two 6 and 1/2 inch drivers to put out bass, buit they do so surprisingly well. I find the bass to be very smooth, clean , and tight. Yet, its really filling in the bottom end of my hearing ability. Yes, I am sure that many subs can produce lower bass, but I really can't hear it. Furthermore, this unit was very easy to integrate into my system. The flow from the mains to the sub is really seamless to my ears. Similar Products Used: Monitor Audio ASW 100, Mirage 12 inch sub |
[Jul 30, 2001]
Edward
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Tight bass, excellent for both music and movies, integrates well w/ main speakers, usual solid NHT finish and build quality, reasonable size
Weakness:
None I got these on a sale that 6 Ave is running now. They are an authorized dealer and these are the bargain of the century. |
[Dec 04, 2001]
Brian
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Review Update I posted a while back with a less-than stellar review of the Super Sub. Since then, I have lived with the sub for a while, and added a second one to my system after seeing them go on sale at OneCall for $256. At that price, I think this is about the best subwoofer value around, and I’m amazed that they still have them in stock. I might even buy a third one for a future bedroom system. |
[May 15, 2001]
Brian
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
Hum problems on both units – potential design or quality control problem? Bass quality not the tightest. Also, have heard that NHT is releasing a re-designed SuperSub that is front-firing. Perhaps NHT noticed the same problems? I wanted to replace my 8” Atlantic Technology PBM 162 “subwoofer” with a more powerful unit for a long time. Not because it sounded bad; I just wanted to upgrade my subwoofer to match the other upgrades in my system. My first choice was Hsu Research’s VTF-2 for $500, same price as the SuperSub, but rated to go much lower and very positively reviewed by many sources. Unfortunately I discovered the limitations of the U.S. Postal System (my only realistic option here), and the VTF-2 was just slightly too large to mail. My second choice was the well-reviewed NHT SubOne, but that, too, was too big. Back to the drawing board, I decided to wait for my next trip to the mainland and bring a subwoofer back on the plane with me, and then my PBM 162 failed and I was forced to go ahead and purchase a new sub. (during my waiting time, by the way, I found that the NHT 1.5’s, which I use as my main speakers, actually had pretty decent bass response on their own in my room) Similar Products Used: JBL 8-inch sub, Atlantic technology PBM-162 |
[Mar 12, 2001]
Robert
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Its looks
Weakness:
Where do I start...... Well i was very excited about this product and could not wait to recieve it for it was going to be a "filler" sub with my rear speakers. Took it out of the box..so far so good.Looks like a quality piece,but thats where it all came to an end. The sub rattled like a snake,bottomed out easily and was no way near the asking price of 500 dollars.I would go as far to say that this sub was the biggest piece of crap that i have auditioned in quite some time. How and why NHT would ever come out with a sub-par SUB like this is beyond me. It goes back,and because of its poor quality so does my SUB1. Similar Products Used: Many,including the NHT sub1 |
[Aug 12, 2000]
Ken Ambrose
Audiophile
Strength:
Infinitely variable gain and crossover freq, which is rare in this price range (between 100-40 hz), quality construction, multiple hook-up options.
Weakness:
Response rolls off below 37 hz, ported enclosure My Boston Acoustics VR975 couldn't go quite as low as I prefer, hence the NHT. I began by using the NHT's built in crossover (as recommended in the manual), so the Bostons would only get freqs. higher than 100hz, and the sub handled everything below that, and I set the gain to the center of the range. This resulted in somewhat boomy and overblown bass. With careful trial and error adjustment of the NHT gain and crossover freq. rolloff, I was able to get noticable improvement in the sound by adjusting the crossover freq. down to about 55 hz. and the gain to about 40%. Now I have *almost* the bass that I feel is close to live. The lowest "kick-drum" body blows are still not there, but I'm much closer to live bass sound than before, and the Bostons now seem to be smoother and more open in the midrange, especially at louder volumes |