Ohm Walsh 5 Floorstanding Speakers
Ohm Walsh 5 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 06, 2015]
musicmasters
AudioPhile
I bought these thinking they would be a buy and try and 10 years later i find myself listing to these more than my Wilson PuPs |
[Feb 01, 2011]
sallyandjeff
Audio Enthusiast
i have ohm supper 5 prototype they are the biggest speakers ohm has ever made they stand over 5' tall and have 12" walsh driver the bass is very low i don't know if i can get these upgraded and i am afraid to find out how much it would cost but i think i will need to have them done someday. harpsichord sounds great i also have have sound cylinders and c2 used to have walsh 4s and d2s does anyone think these would be worth money ? |
[Jan 20, 2011]
kosh2258
Audio Enthusiast
Walsh 5LE upgraded with new 5000 series drivers purchased December of 2010.
|
[Jul 24, 2010]
Duboiz
AudioPhile
This review is for the Ohm Walsh 4 which is the 1st in line down from the 5. I recently came across a for-sale post on Craigslit that I could not pass. A pair of mint Ohm Walsh 4 with a company rebuilt drivers. The owner was the original owner and had all paper work and even sales sheets and review sheets that came from the factory,
|
[Apr 16, 2006]
mamboni
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
1. Realistic holographic imaging and huge airy soundstage as only an omni-directional loudspeaker can create.
Weakness:
None This is a review of the latest iteration of the classic Walsh 5 loudspeakers [“W5s”], the “series 3” henceforth herein called the “W5-S3s.” I had reviewed the W5s back on March 8, 1999 for this website. I have been immensely happy with the W5s all these years; however, several months ago, I noted some flapping sounds when driving them with (admittedly loud) 16-20Hz organs pedals(!). I suspected driver suspension/surround failure or misalignment due to driver mechanical drift after thousands of hours of perfect performance. Prompted by a fear of sudden mechanical failure (and the withdrawal effects from the loss of my W5s), coupled with curiosity about what the newer Ohm drivers might sound like after 20 years of R&D, I called Ohm Acoustics. John Strohbeen informed me that he was putting the finishing touches on the latest and greatest W5 drivers, the series 3 [S3], scheduled for market sometime in 2006. I could, for about $3000, purchase the W5-S3 head units and pop them onto my Walsh cabinets (with minor mods to the cabinets). Frankly, I was skeptical that the new drivers could sound better than my beloved W5s, let alone $3000 worth of improvement, and I was afraid that if I was disappointed with the W5-S3s, that conversion back would be a pain! John indulged my reservations and suggested W5-S3 head unit drivers with the binding posts built in, so only the cabinet port mod (which is easily reversible) would be needed when switching between the W5 and W5-S3 drivers for listening comparisons. We agreed and several months later, the new drivers arrived, packaged to withstand any abuse, double-boxed and padded so as the thwart the best efforts of the UPS (pronounced OOPS) gorillas, in perfect condition and working order and with the binding posts professionally installed. The units appeared solidly and smartly built. Switching these new W5-S3 units with the W5s, and the port mod insert, took all of 5 minutes. I resisted listening to them before performing a pre-break in of 12 hours of wideband Bach organ music at moderate (~80 db) volumes, followed by same material at high (~90-95 db) for 12 hours. On Saturday morning, serious listening began. Frankly, I was stunned by the improvement in sound quality. Yes, the huge soundstage, the holographic imaging, the clean non-fatiguing sound, and the wide sweet-spot and the amazing disappearing act performed by Walsh speakers: all these were instantly apparent. But, there were dramatic improvements. First, the noise floor has been reduced to near blackness. The W5-S3s reproduce more detail than the W5s. They depict every nuance, every microdynamic of the musical line. The hall acoustic and space between performers is far more evident. Vocalists have amazing presence and every manner of breathing, chest/throat resonance and articulation can be heard – very up close and personal. Dialog comprehension is perfect. This detail retrieval far surpasses the W5s – though voices are never artificially spotlighted – their sound is vivid, natural and perfectly placed within the context of the wonderfully coherent soundstage. The orchestral image is somewhat larger, as stings are now closer and sit at eye/ear level just behind the speakers. The rear of the orchestra is further back and less foreshortened. Images routinely extend well beyond the W5-S3s laterally and well beyond the rear walls of my listening room. The soundstage is huge – an impressive sense of air and space. On well-recorded CDs, you are there – these speakers create such presence. If the original W5s had a somewhat reticent and polite midrange, the W5-S3 midrange is incredibly vivid and alive – it breaths – what a difference for the better. The sound is pure electrostat and Quad-like – detailed, delicate and utterly free of noise and distortion and oh so coherent – quite an achievement. There is absolutely not the slightest hint that what you are hearing is emanating from box/cabinet. The W5-S3s project a perfect depiction of the acoustic space and performers within, superimposed upon and obscuring the room boundaries like some impossibly realistic sonic hologram. The W5-S3 have superior dynamics and better snap – subito fortes startle. On low level passages and small ensembles, they sound like tiny little studio monitors with their intimate detailed presentation whilst the acoustic space remains immense – a split second later they can project a fortissimo orchestral tutti with stunning power and authority that energizes every air molecule in the room. Every instrumental voice is clearly delineated. Unison sections are depicted as distinct voices seated side by side (i.e. when the horns play unison, horns 1-4 are distinctly voiced, the slightest differences in attack, intonation, tone and phrasing distinguish them). Massed strings are depicted lifelike, bowing, rosin and all. When the strings bow in unison, you feel the subsonics of the stair floor flexing. The W5-S3 effortlessly project the power and artistry of a symphony orchestra at full tilt – quite hair raising – major goose bumps factor. At loud volumes – they remain detailed and unrestrained – there is simply no audible distortion or compression – absolutely no fatigue after hours of listening. The W5-S3 never run out of steam. And the bass: holy cow! I still cannot believe the bass output of these W5-S3. The bass is tighter, louder and lower than the W5’s, easily flat to 20Hz. Bass drum whacks sound like a Howitzer firing. The entire room is energized, the floor seeming to bend and ripple, my chest thumped. There seemed no limit to the bottom extension. More amazing was the complete perceived lack of energy storage: whilst playing subsonic bass, the midbass and above remained completely transparent and clean. The bass would stop on a dime – instantly –not the slightest hint of overhang. The grip the W5-S3 maintained on the bottom octaves was like some massive steel vise – just jaw dropping. And, the W5-S3 are more efficient than the power-hungry W5s. Similar musical calisthenics on the W5s would cause the humongous heat fins on my Sumo Andromeda II beasties (400W per channel into 4 Ohms – high current over-built Mosfets) to get hot to the touch, and I had blown more than one power rail fuse on a room-shaking drum whack. Running the W5-S3s hard for hours couldn’t even get the amp fins warm – huh? – I was completely surprised by this seeming violation of the laws of physics. I must attribute this improved efficiency to the massive neodymium motors of the main drivers with their vastly greater magnet flux densities (vis-à-vis ceramic or alnico). The W5-S3s are an achievement in superlative sound reproduction. With their gorgeous airy top, their palpable you-are-there breathing pulsing midrange, to a bass that is otherworldly in power, extension and vise-like control, the their amazing disappearing act within the huge soundstage they project, I would stack them against any loudspeaker available today at any price. The W5-S3s manage to give you a spacious and completely coherent and transparent soundstage with life-like 3D imaging, a distortion-less completely non-fatiguing sound and unrestrained dynamics. They do it all – and virtually perfectly. But, that this is accomplished with a single crossover-less full-range driver (the tweeter is only used to fill in the very top octave above 8 kHz) that is flat and coherent from 20Hz to 20kHz is extraordinary. To the W5 owners out there: I urge you to upgrade to the W5-S3s - you really don’t know what you are missing. To everyone else: the W5-S3s are the very best loudspeaker I have ever heard – I truly believe there is no other loudspeaker with the collective attributes of these amazing sound transducers. Congratulations to John Strohbeen and his team at Ohm Acoustics for a hitting a veritable acoustic grand slam – the Walsh 5 Series 3 is a masterpiece! Customer Service Excellent –
Similar Products Used: Equipment used:
|
[Sep 13, 2003]
jneill1
AudioPhile
Strength:
Spectacular imaging and projection of the presence of the performers in the room. Very flat frequency response from top to a very low bottom. Not fussy about placement and a wide sweet spot. I give them 5 stars for value because though they're not cheap, they're close to state-of-the art, and for high end speaker of this caliber, the cost is quite reasonable, especially if you upgrade a pair of Fs ($3,000) or buy some F-5s when they're available as they are periodically ($3,500).
Weakness:
They're big, but with sound this good, who cares? They also take a long time to break in (at least 300 hours), but then most high end electronics also take a long time to burn in. This review is for the F-5s, which are Walsh 5 Mk-II drivers on F cabinets which produce the same sound as the 5s, but bass down to "only" 25hz rather than 20hz. I first heard an Ohm Walsh speaker in 1985 while walking through an audio shop in a mall. I heard a Joni Mitchell CD playing through Walsh 2's, and it was so realistic it sounded to me like she was in the room. I'll never forget that experience. The next year I purchased a pair of Walsh 4's which I lived happily with for 15 years, when I upgraded to the Walsh 200 Mk-II drivers--same character but smoother, more refined top end. When Ohm had a sale of Ohm F-5's last year, I traded the upgraded 4's in for the F-5s, so the price quoted is including trade-in (a serious bargain). I have never heard a speaker that can come close to the ability of these speakers in re-creating a sense of the original recording space in the room. Big, spacious sound, very smooth top to bottom (very low bottom) with fantastic imaging. The sweet spot is fairly broad, and so speaker placement isn't as critical as with other speakers. In fact you can still perceive the image walking around the room. (With some jazz recordings, it sounds like you're in a club). They're great speakers if you like organ music but also wonderful with acoustic guitar or chamber ensembles. With well recorded classical (like early Mercury Living Presence, the Columbia Bruno Walters stereo recordings, RCA Living Stereo CSO/Szell) or classic jazz like Miles Davis' Kind of Blue, the sensation of the actual presence of the performers in the room is uncanny. My friends are amazed. Some friends watched The Fellowship of the Ring with me using the 5s (two channel mode), and they thought the sound was better than in the theater (no center channel speaker needed, the imaging is so good). I am puzzled why Ohm's speakers are so little mentioned in today's audio press because the few times they have been they've received very glowing reviews. The original 5's received a high recommendation in Stereophile from Dick Olsher who remarked on their excellent imaging, and said that they "compete very well with the best dynamic designs money can buy. Soundstaging is another strength and at their best the 5s can set up a very palpable illusion of the original performing space. . . . it is one of the few dynamic speakers that my jaded electrostic taste buds could live with." More recently, Kenneth Duke, in a review in the Sensible Sound of the Walsh 300 Mk-II's (5's without the room adjustment controls), commented on their "marvelous you-are-there" imaging and said they "join the ranks of the two or three other expensive speakers that I can strongly recommend." If it's not obviouos from my comments, I agree 100% with these reviewers. A caveat: they're very accurate speakers and so are ruthless on bad recordings (esp.early digital) and need a fair amount of power (100 watts-plus into 4 ohms) and so to sound their best they need a good quality signal source and high quality amplification.(They sound okay with mid-fi--I had a Carver amp with my original 4s--but with high quality gear their amazing capabilities come out). I'm currently running them with Musical Fidelity A3cr pre- and power amps, Musical Fidelity A3CD with A324 upsampling DAC through MIT MI-330 Plus S3 interconnects, and MIT MH-750 Plus S3 speaker cables. With the current set-up I am not overstating when I say they sound fabulous! I can't afford to spend $20-30K on a sound system and short of that I don't know how it could get better than what I have with the MF gear and the Walsh 5's. A final note: John Strohbeen of Ohm is a pleasure to deal with. Similar Products Used: Ohm Walsh 4, Walsh Super 4s (4s with the Walsh 200 Mk-II upgrade). (Just for the record, I've also used highly recommended monitor speakers in my home office, but though I find them impressive, they'r |
[Jun 11, 2003]
Bryan Neal
AudioPhile
Strength:
clarity, midrange, presence, soundstage,imaging, customer service, history, VALUE and last but not least a company that still believes in providing a QUALITY product and takes pride in their reputation.
Weakness:
If any : some may want a more "in your face sound" ( go to best-buy or circuit city) : ) some may like a diferent styling for the cabinets - check out the website for yourself. I have waited years to get the speakers that I wanted, and waited about 1 year after getting these speakers to write my review - so here goes: I finally had enough savings to begin my journey into high fidelity which began with hearing a pair of old ESS Heil speakers at a family friends home as a teenager - I swore that one day I would have a pair of speakers like that. I researched everything I could get my hands on - magazines, visiting Sound Advice (Fla - HiFi store), and most importantly, internet research which has proved the best tool of all. I came across "Ohm" in an online banner ad, and looked at the site - the "Walsh" design intrigued me, and also the loyalty that Ohm has to their customers as evidenced by the trade in policy - and the history of making quality/value oriented speakers for 30 years - I called the factory and spoke with John Strohbeem(the president) who answers the phone 90% of the time, and he suggested that I could save $$ by having brand new Mark 5 drivers, paired with some reconditioned F-5 (pyramid) cabinets, with the 120 day guarantee - I bought them - BEST purchase I have ever made !! You do need some power though, I first had them hooked up to a Marantz 2270 reciever - good sound but not enough for the Ohms. Then I had a Hafler amp, better, but still not quite there. Finally I bought the Outlaw 950/755 combo 300 watts @ 4ohms. NOW everything just opened up - These are CLEAR, OPEN speakers - great for every type of music , bit I think because of their clarity are especially beautiful for acoustic instruments and vocals - the midrange is sweet. The Mark 5 drivers have 4 switches on them to adjust for room size and taste, so these can be adjusted to a new room or home with no pproblems. I am also a sailor - so I'll use a maritime analogy. If you are into speedboats racing across the water, engines roaring, in your face sound , then Ohms aren't for you. If you like the serenity, clarity and understated beauty of a sailboat during sunset - with a glass of wine - THESE are your speakers. Don't get me wrong - these speakers can play rock with the best of them - but they are not trying to blow you out of your seat - they present the performers as if they are onstage in front of you- with pinpoint accuracy -just enogh "push" with the Outlaw amp to create a definite "presence" - with absolutely no harshness - wonderful !! I have heard dozens of different speakers and none matched the Ohms - for purity of sound. Do yourself a favor - cut out the middle man - save some money and still get the BEST speakers on the market - You will feel like I do, that you stumbled upon a rare gem - and do business with a company that still believes in quality, customer loyalty, and value. Feel free to e-mail me with any questions. It's just a shame more people don't know about these speakers and the company behind them - because they are now only sold factory direct. www.ohmspeekers.com Bryan - Jax, Fla. Similar Products Used: NONE |
[Jun 12, 2002]
George Chambers
AudioPhile
This review is for the Walsh 4 upgrade to Walsh 5, but may be worth reading for those interested in top-quality speakers. In the fall of 2001, due to some intermittent dropouts in one of my Walsh 4's (1984 vintage), I decided to update my system and began auditioning various speakers. At a friend’s suggestion, I listened to B&W 803’s, which sounded smooth, but seemed to lack the presence and power of my old Walsh 4's. Since the salesman offered to let me bring in my 4's for an A/B comparison, I did, along with 3 CD’s that test speakers quickly and effectively. They were the Mahler 2nd (CSO, Solti, London–the beginning of the first and second movements)–and the Tchaikovsky Symphony No. 2 (CSO, Abbado, Columbia--the beginning of the first movement, for bass quality and response down to the low C–around 32Hz). I should also add here that I’m a former symphony musician and prefer speakers that come close to reproducing the power and weight of the sound you hear and feel when sitting in the orchestra. Back to the A/B test. In spite of their age, my old Walsh’s were much clearer and miles ahead in bass response. Although we did listen, back and forth, it wasn’t necessary, the differences being so obvious. Because the B&W 803’s were $5000 and the B&W 804’s were $8000, I went to Ohm’s website and found that a Walsh 4 to Walsh 5 conversion was about $3000, including a 30 day, money back guarantee. I decided to take a chance: if I didn’t like them, all I would lose was the cost of shipping them back. Before ordering, however, I did speak to an engineer at Ohm and told him I hoped my rebuilt speakers would sound close to the old Walsh 4xo, a model that superceded mine around 1990 and was excellent. He said they’d sound better and would keep that in mind, telling me I liked a “forward” sound. A month or so later, the new Walsh 5 drivers arrived, having been designed to fit on my existing Walsh 4 cabinets. I am very pleased with the result. The Walsh 4/5's are more imposing than the 4's were. They speak with authority. I would recommend Ohm to anyone who loves music and is looking for powerful, realistic sound. |
[Oct 30, 1999]
Ken
Audiophile
Strength:
GREAT SOUNDSTAGE I have had a set of 4x0's since 1990 and they have the best stereo of any speaker I have ever heard. Similar Products Used: Many other speakers |
[Nov 02, 2001]
David Macks
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clear highs, precise controls that allow for on speaker adjustments. Castors to facilitate movement. Marvelous to look at wonderful to hear.
Weakness:
Old school speaker jacks and heavy to move. Bass could be a tad tighter This review is for a pair of black Ohm Walsh4's. I know I reviewed them earlier but now that I've had a chance to finally adjust them properly for my room, system and alike, I just have to review them again. I thought this sounded good before, now they sound great. Improved cabling and upstream DAC's have really shown me how good these speakers are. That coupled with my fine tuning the on cabinet adjustments on them now have these bad boys singing. Bass not as tight as some modern speakers but I love these buggers now. Also, the Walsh design is beautiful compared to cookie cutter monolith blocks that pass for speakers today. If you can pick up a pair of used Ohm Walsh's, no matter the model, do it. Similar Products Used: Ohm Walsh II's |