Paradigm Reference Eclipse Floorstanding Speakers
Paradigm Reference Eclipse Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 27, 2002]
Chris Matthews
Audiophile
Strength:
Big, solid, tight and deep bottom end. Nice wife approval rate because of thin profile. Easy to look at. Sound great. Sounds good soft or loud...and they do play LOUD!
Weakness:
Tall and heavy. With spikes you can hardly move them without two people. I've had these almost two years and am still madly in love with them. I purchased them as a package with the B&W center channel, and Paradigm surrounds in November 1999. I bought the Paradigm setup because I spend a great deal of time listening to music and most of the 5.1 systems I'd heard sounded downright awful when it came to listening to music. Similar Products Used: Linn Espek, Martin-Logan Odessey, Sonus Faber Grand Piano, Aerial 10T. |
[Jan 15, 2002]
Angus
Audiophile
Strength:
I don't know of any other speaker that will go this low. Flat response to below 20hz provides base that will amaze even the most jaded listener. In a large room the rear facing speakers creat a wide and beautiful soundstage.
Weakness:
These are large, tall, heavy speakers that need some room to breathe I'll begin by saying that I had never bought into the speaker "Burn in" theory until I got these speakers home and began listening. In the begining the bass seemed absolutely unmanageable. Even when adjusted all the way down, with some music it was still dominating. Now, after maybe 200-300 hours of playing time I can adjust the bass back up to the point where I can find a satisfying balance with any music Similar Products Used: Martin Logan Quest Z( laughable)Vandersteen 2CE (fair) Dynaudio Countour 3.0 (nice but not much bottom end, will not play loud) Maggie 3.6 (wonderful, but no base and no ability to crank up) Linn (did someone throw a blanket over the speaker?) Revel (ahhh...but I am about $8000 short this month) |
[Jan 01, 1999]
Rory
an Audiophile
I bought these speakers in preference to the Paradigm studio monitors, Definitive Technology BP2000s, and some samplings of the VR-4 von Schweikert speakers. They have a very deep soundstage with surprisingly good imaging for a bipolar speaker. The bass is very deep though the speaker requires a good solid state amplifier for ultimate bass tautness. I'm running them on a Bryston 3B-ST. They have excellent midrange clarity with very good timbral balance. The tweeter has a tendency to be a bit bright in the 2 - 3kHz (upper midrange and 'presence') region. Upgrading my DAC in the Marantz CD-67 CD player to the MSB Link D/A made a BIG difference. Cabling makes a big differnce too with these speakers. Positioning in my room was a nightmare. Make sure you have a big room! These speakers have to be placed as far away from walls as is possible. |
[May 18, 2000]
B B
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Bass, Midrange, Build quality, Looks, Overall customer satisaction
Weakness:
Discontinued (come on Paradigm!!!) The other reviewers said almost everything that needs to be said. I have to add that they are BY FAR the BEST speaker Paradigm has produced. It is a crying shame they have been discontinued. Maybe someday..... Similar Products Used: Def. Tech, Mirage, Polk Audio (sort of) |
[Mar 16, 2001]
Rick
Audiophile
Strength:
Large sound stage
Weakness:
difficult to set up I am using paradigm's in a home theater powered with adcom amps using kimber 4tc wire. The speakers are bi-wired and sound amazing. I have had many compliments on the sound of my theater and I feel I owe it all to the Paradigm's and the help I got from my dealer at Classic Audio. Very smoothe and open sound and can attack most any passage thrown their way. Similar Products Used: polk, rogers, kef, celestion |
[Dec 05, 2000]
Bryan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
They're big
Weakness:
They're big. Not the best looking speakers around. Very smooth and natural. No listening fatigue. Great with movies and music. |