Paradigm Reference Studio 20 Floorstanding Speakers
Paradigm Reference Studio 20 Floorstanding Speakers
[Sep 23, 1999]
Jim
an Audiophile
I have owned a pair of 20's for about eight months and have had the opportunity to place them in dramatically differently sized rooms. I am using McCormack electronics at the front end; the DNA.5 amplifier and TLC preamp, a EAD CD1000 CD player and Kimber PBJ interconnects. Many of you claim the 20's are hashy in the upper frequency ranges. You must not blame this on the 20's; to do so is to admit your ignorance toward the electronic audio system as a whole. Granted, metal dome tweeters are typically less silky sounding than their composite peers, but the intrinsic performance characteristics of the system's front end gear should not be overlooked. Given their price point, I think that most people who purchase the 20's are driving them with amplification of relatively poor quality. Characteristically, most Japanese-designed amplification tends to be hashy in the higher frequencies, while that from the English design mindset is relatively staid. The DNA.5 amplifier retails for $1000, which I don't feel is off the charts for a speaker of this price (and quality). With the exception of the initial break-in period, I have never noticed the 20's to be overly "bright" or "harsh", and I have had the opportunity to listen to outrageously expensive speakers in outrageously ideal room conditions (which, of course, cause the 20's to seem completely underwealming in any environment) It is important, when making performance comparisons, for the critic to look at the whole system in relative terms before blaming one aspect of it for what he might deem poor performance. The 20's are a very good value for their intended purpose and worthy of great praise, when mated with complimentary electronics,for their solid performance. |
[Nov 26, 2000]
Stephen Berger
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Detailed, refined, musical, they help me feel the music
Weakness:
Binding posts don't hold spades too well I am so happy with these speakers. I initially purchased a pair of Mini Monitor's and even though I loved them I felt that what I was getting was just short of extraordinary so I decided to move up to the 20's. Similar Products Used: Owned Mini Monitors, Auditioned B&W 601's/602's and Dynaudio Audience 50's |
[Nov 29, 2000]
ROB
Casual Listener
Strength:
great value
Weakness:
half-decent bass sorry people, the prices in my review were in CANADIAN dollars, not american, so that's why you might think i got ripped off, but that's the story! Similar Products Used: none |
[Nov 29, 2000]
ROB
Casual Listener
Strength:
great mid-high range
Weakness:
half-decent bass Boy, Did I ever get a good deal on these things. I seen this ad in the paper about a guy selling these things. I called him up, but he moved to australia. but, anyways these were still in the original boxes and were NEVER used. Similar Products Used: none |
[Jan 08, 2000]
Sam
Audio Enthusiast
This is a follow up to make two comments...first off, bi-wire these babies with some good cables. With that done these compare with many mini monitors in the $1-2k price range. Also...beware of companies dumping the old version of these as the newer version has a much better finish, and the cabinet seems more solid also. |
[Feb 05, 1999]
Who Cares?
Studio 20 - great bass, great imaging, great price -- but the treble s-u-c-k-s big-time. I highly recommend these speakers to anyone who appreciates an ear-bleedingly bright, cold and sterile top end (you know who you are). |
[Mar 30, 2001]
Andrew White
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Everything, imaging, soundstage, clarity, incredible speakers
Weakness:
At the price i paid, there is none Just yesterday i recieved my tax return and the first thing that appeared in my head was new speakers. After reading the reviews of the Studio 20's i believed it to be the best choice. Went to my local paradigm dealer and recieved these puppies for $500 CANADIAN funds!!! i believe that's approximately 320 dollars US funds. I took the shiver test and passed with flying colors. Put my favorite song on (Hotel California, Eagles, H*ll freezes over), every single note on all those guitars was distinct, crystal clear, incredible. The hairs on the back of my neck, h*ll, my entire body just stood up and applauded. Definately the best investment i have ever made in home audio. Similar Products Used: Paradigm Monitors, Klipsch, JM Labs Chorus, B&W's |
[Jan 03, 2000]
Jerry Crum
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Compact size, solid build, very smooth top end, pretty decent bass extension for the size
Weakness:
needs to be played at higher levels to sound right, slightly recessive mids, bass a little muddy This is actually a re-review after a year and a half of use. The room itself is apparently a difficult one acoustically since the Paradigms were the first thing that sounded good in the room after a number of tries. As a result I was initially very pleased with them and waxed enthusiastic. But over time, something was missing. Hard to pin down, but definitely something was wrong. More recently I had a chance to pick up a pair of 1978 vintage JBL L-110's (modified with different woofers) and the comparison was not at all favorable to the Paradigms. Since the L-110s are much larger and use a ported 10", you would expect a solider and deeper low end. But what was not expected was the increase in definition, depth, reproduction of hall ambience, and a sense of liveness. By comparison, the midrange of the Paradigms sounded withdrawn and "flat". On duets, the JBLs easily resolved the sound into two distinct voices, while with the Paradigms they were homogenized into a muddle of voice that was difficult to seperate. Perhaps most disturbing is the Paradigms tendency to make ambience disappear. On Proprius' CD "Live at the Pawnshop" the sense of being in a club with the diners and musicians is noticeably less with the Paradigms. At first I felt the JBLs must have an elevated midrange to give more of a presence to the sound, but on playing a number of large scale classical works, the orchestra was in proper perspective and not at all "forward" in placement. Similar Products Used: Bose AM-5, Design Acoustics 3 piece, Bose 301 Series IV |
[Aug 22, 2001]
Bob McDonald
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great detail and imaging, depth and dimensionality of soundstage, Incredible bass from a rather small bass/midrange driver, smooth midrange, detailed highs without harshness
Weakness:
Not full range, must have good set of stands to extract the maximum performance (minor gripes) Well I ordered a set of Paradigm Studio 100's in cherry wood and an MCA-3 Amp from Stereoland in Minneapolis MN, and they were kind enough to send home a set of Studio 20's, Premier J-20 stands (the ones intended for the Studio 40's, so the 20's sat a bit lower, oh well!), and a Marantz 2 Channel Amp... Similar Products Used: Paradigm line, Def Tech's (yuk), Kef Reference, Dynaudio, Energy, Monitor Audio, M&K, NHT, Martin Logan, Vandersteen, Audes |
[Oct 29, 2000]
Evan H
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Amazingly clear and dark sound.
Weakness:
Bass below 60Hz will require a sub I've had these speakers for a little over a year, and figured now was as good a time as any to submit a review. When I auditioned the speakers I chose them because their sound was much darker than the Infinity and especially the B&W speakers in it's prece range. Similar Products Used: B&W 301, Infinity RS5 |