Polk Audio M3 II Floorstanding Speakers
Polk Audio M3 II Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[May 10, 2001]
Thomas A
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
very flexible, includes bracket, nice sound
Weakness:
Kind of ugly design: better speakers out there for same or just a tad more I've had these speakers for 5-6 yrs now..and they have served me well. If you have a small HT and using for surrounds (could not see using for anything else- party room maybe) I upgraded to the f/x300i's..ands soon to the 500's. As good as they are..for the price..I'd get the RT25's or spend a tad more and get the 35's.. Similar Products Used: Polk f/x300i |
[Oct 06, 2000]
Jason
Audiophile
Strength:
Versitile mounting, wide soundstage that extends well beyond the speaker; they "disappear" as well as any speaker I've heard; nice mid range clarity and detail
Weakness:
Limited bass (but hey, you can't expect bone rattling bass from a small minimonitor); limited dynamics and transients, limited power handling, especially on music and movie peaks; mounting brackets seam a bit weak (the bracket on both speakers have broken on mine) I purchased these with my very first home theater setup (do you remember Pro- Logic?) when I was in college back in 1991 for use as the rear surrounds. They still perform well at this duty, although once my theater/listening room is built, they will be replaced with full-size Magnepan MMG's to complement Magnepan 1.6's for the front. Similar Products Used: None. These are the only rear channel speakers I've ever owned. The rest that I've owned have all been large, much more expensive floorstanders |