Polk Audio Monitor 10 Series 2 Floorstanding Speakers
Polk Audio Monitor 10 Series 2 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 06, 2019]
Chadmartin01
Strength:
Great amount of bass for their size, no need for a subwoofer. Mids are very nice and balanced highs are perfect amount of “ting” without being shrill. What’s not to love about a Monitor 12? Weakness:
Would love to find some replacement grills. Price Paid: 300
Purchased: Used
|
[Oct 29, 2014]
Newman Fertig
AudioPhile
Polk Audio 10B Speakers.
|
[Nov 12, 2008]
steve schwanke
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
durable, good imaging, can be pushed and still not wear out the listener, sounds good with classic rock, indie rock, alternative rock, jazz, country swing, and folk
Weakness:
yes, some people will find that size is a problem I have owned at pair of Polk 10-B's since the mid 1980's. They blew us away at the time as we were stepping up from some 1970's Marantz 6-G's. We listened to a lot of what's now known as classic rock at the time and really liked the increased mid-range response that these speakers offered.
Similar Products Used: Bose, Cerwin Vega, Manatz, Sansui, all vintage of course, new Infinity and Jbl
|
[Sep 07, 2002]
poloman
AudioPhile
Strength:
Very open .Neutral ,natural midrange. tight ,Deep Bass Improved sound with every equipment upgrade.
Weakness:
too bright in treble Can become fatiguing Need right equipment. Had these babies for ten years now and they sound better than ever! There on 14" stand design steel stands, sand filled and spiked. Driving with B&K EX 442 200 WPC ; Audio Research LS-7 all tube Pre. Mid-range is great. Bass is great, Not boomy. Treble is a little bright, they Can become a little fatiguing. Tubes calm that down I modified thes slightley by putting 4 extra screws in the basket surround of the 10" passive radiater. The holes were already there. and I put felt pads around the tweeter to tame diffractions. These were the best speakers I've had. I guess the tube Pre helped they do a dissapearing act. They 6throw a very nice sound stage. you really hear the phantom center channel. But alas there time has come and gone. I'm Finally upgrading after 10 years,even though I really love these speakers. I just bought a pair of B&W Matrix 802 s3. Hope they were worth the upgrade. Oh the ndigital is EAD T-700 and Dsp 7000 Which really help . Similar Products Used: N/A |
[Jul 26, 2002]
Greenman
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Crisp, definative sound with terrific bass.
Weakness:
Size of monitior, muddy midrange. Have had these boys since 1987, Have been with me through thick and thin and have not let me down once. Unfortunately, my living room can longer provide adequate space for them and I need to replace them with smaller units. |
[Feb 15, 2000]
Troy
Audio Enthusiast
Wow - Have to agree with other reviewers; I'm surprised to see reviews still around for these speakers. I bought a new pair of these back in '92 and loved them. After one year I traded them in on a pair of used SRS 3.1 TLs that I still have today. Polk needs to get back to the monitor style speakers of old. |
[Jul 28, 2000]
Chris
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Nice smooth bass. Look cool with the grills off so you can watch the passive radiator go "boing boing boing!" Last forever.
Weakness:
Weakness mostly in my back from moving them around everytime I switched dorm rooms or apartments. I bought these speakers new sometime around 1990, soon after starting college. They were my first "quality" set of speakers. I would agree with other posters that they're probably better than the mass-market stuff that Polk now sells. Similar Products Used: Some old JVC 3-ways I had in high school. I also remember A/B-ing them with similarly priced Paradigms at the store. |
[Nov 21, 2001]
Scott Jalbert
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Beautiful clean sound
Weakness:
Large, takes up a lot of room. Heavy. First of all I want to state that I am not entirely shure of the model of these. The label on the back says Polkaudio Monitor Series 2. On the back of the tweaters they say manufactured in 1987. I have seen pictures of the 10's and mine are much bigger. These have the soft dome tweater, Four 6.5" drivers, and the 12" passive radiator. They are 38" tall and 16" wide and they weigh a ton. Visually impressive is the word if you see them without the grills. Similar Products Used: Heard other casual enthusiasts that just bought new systems featuring Denon, Infinity, JBL, etc.. Always like coming home to the Polk's. |
[Jan 06, 2002]
MG
Audiophile
Strength:
Great bass. Shimmering highs.
Weakness:
Recessed "mouth full of cotton" midrange. I used to sell these guys at retail in the late '80s - early '90s. Awesome speakers for Rock music!! They blew away the comparably priced Cerwin Vegas of the time in terms of clarity and punch!! My big beef with them was the mids, though. They tended to have a "cotton-stuffed-into-the-cheeks" quality with vocals. But hey, what do I know? Have a blessed day!! Similar Products Used: B/A T830s, Phase Tech PC600s, etc... |
[Dec 29, 2001]
Stuart Geiger
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Awesome sound quality/clarity - longevity!
Weakness:
big and ugly, I'm down to 2 front cover clips per speaker. My speakers have been with me since college (>10 years). They have seen a lot in that time. In college I fried the tweeters twice blasting heavy metal at parties ($60.00 to replace thru Polk). My Kenwood system I had back then (very sweet) is now moth-balled and replaced with a Sony db830 home theater video receiver. My Polks 10B's are the front mains with Klipsch 3.1 as the rear surround. The sound is still incredible and I cannot justify buying eye candy speakers yet. Maybe one day when my Polks are relegated to the garage?? Similar Products Used: Klipsch 3.1 |