Spendor SP7/1 Floorstanding Speakers
Spendor SP7/1 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Oct 05, 2015]
B. Diver
AudioPhile
Spendor SP7/1's from Spendor's Master Series. SErios heritage from the BBC monirtors.
|
[Feb 03, 2005]
joebone
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Balance! Very,very good in ALL paramaters. Like the little blonde girl said, not too hot, not too cold, just right! I'm finding these delightful with all sorts of music. And given used prices and likely continued support by responsible manufacturer and distributor, an absolute bargain on the used market.
Weakness:
Not for a real small or real large room. And you can get more vivid details from others, albeit with tradeoffs in terms of overall presentation. It all depends what you like. Also note rarity - I think they only made these for 4-5 years before manufacturing costs halted production. These masterpieces don't get their due respect. But I must first digress to explain why I think so. 20 years ago, when transitioning from music to law as a career, I cruised New York City in search of the best speakers on my budget, and ended up with a pair of Preludes. Since then,I've also owned S-20, S-100, and SP1-2/e, depending on my room. For 4 years I had some ATC 20's, and have also had the Harbeth Compact 7ES2 and Quad 63 in my current home. I've also hooked up a half- dozen friends and family with various Spendors. So, yeah, you could say I'm a fan... One thing I've come to realize is that the room interface is critical. Those ATC's were great, but even with a subwoofer (REL), they just couldn't move enough air easily in my largish room - they could go plenty loud, but would sound kind of "nervous" in that mode, as if a small amount of air was being pushed quickly, instead of a larger volume of air moving at a more ppropriate rate. On the other hand, my room has some funky acoustics, which is why I'd had to sell my S-100's when I'd first moved in - they excited some nasty resonances, although the room now works better due to fuller furnshing and some structural work. In any event, I shifted from the ATC to the SP1-2/e in the hope that the larger woofer and box would lend more weight. It worked to some degree, but I felt those speakers didn't have the mid-range magic of other Spendors I've heard or owned. Hence a dalliance with Harbeth Compact 7ES2, and the pleasure of having some Quad '63's in the house for a while. That particular Harbeth model is selling like hotcakes, and I found it pretty interesting - a more lively presentation than Spendors I have known, articulate and nicely balanced. But then, a recent lightbulb moment. A year ago I'd hooked my Dad up with an old pair of SP2/2's, and when visting him thought they sounded really marvelous (he uses an old NAD receiver, but has a living room with exceptional acoustics for playback). With a mob of family coming over to my house for this past Christmas week, I didn't want to have the Quads flanking the tree, cramping folks' style and inviting mayhem by the kids. I lucked into a cheap pair of 2/2's, and decided to put them up for the Holiday. Result? Bliss. I think the 2/2 is an incredible package, as it can handle more modern music in a way that sometimes seems difficult for the BC-1 or SP-1, but also has an open and friendly mid-range. So I sold the Harbeths - a more expensive and accomplished speaker, but in some ways not as pleasing to me. The thing that brought me back to the Spendors was the realization that while with the Harbeths I had more of those moments where a particular sound might grab attention due to fidelity to the sound of a real instrument in space, via the 2/2 I was more inclined to take in musical phrases, or appreciate musical development over a longer piece. I've read that some photographers prefer Leica optics to Nikon because the Nikon might provide more detail, but the Leica gets the whole photo over in a more communicative manner. I think this analogy holds true in comparing the better Spendors with other speakers. Those Harbeths (and the Quads) provide more detail, but I'm not sure that's the point when listening to music. I've concluded the Spendors somehow present at a level of particularity that simply facilitates my musical comprehension. Then, the next step, in surprisingly rapid order. A pair of 7/1's shows up locally. Spared the hassle and cost of shipping, I can't resist. And I think I now have the right speaker for my house,after 8.5 years! First clue - I can play louder than with any other speaker, as the 7/1 easily moves lots of air but does not excite funny resonances. I was blown away by the sound of a Batucada (Brazilian samba drums) section - I never expected to have the real feel of that kind of music in my home. Of course, like any Spendor, they sound great at low volume ... but I expected that; OTOH, the high-volume thing was a revelation. I don't know how to explain this - the angled speakers? The mass of the front baffle? But there is no question that this speaker succeeds in my room where the S-100 and 1-2/e could not. Yes, as compared with Harbeth and Quad I sacrifice some obvious detail and an occasional audiophile thrill, but whenever I start listening for detail, it's always there. And I'm rarely losing the forest for the trees, as my focus seems often to be pitched at a level that really concentrates on music rather than audio ephemera. And I have that lovely sense of mass when crescendos occur, particularly in the orchestral cellos and bass. I could not recommned these highly enough for most users. Maybe the 9/1 is better, maybe not - in my room, likely to boom like the S-100 did, and probably not as fast or articulate in the bass. With my little REL sub, I seem to be doing fine. Too bad these are so rare! Similar Products Used: Many Spendors, Harbeth, Quad (see text) |
[Dec 10, 2000]
Brian
Audiophile
Strength:
Crystal clear mid-range, strong high end
Weakness:
You will need a sub woofer I have really enjoyed the Spendor 7/1's. Great recordings sound incredible, especially tight jazz and vocals with soul. I have not found a musical piece that is too fast for the mid range or tweeter. Both sound effortless from the 7/1's. They have a bass port, which is a poor replacement for real bass. A sub is required. My sub is set to pick up at the highest frequency in its range. The rosewood cabinets are truely beautiful. I have never seen nicer cabinets, at any price. |
[Oct 03, 2000]
Art Altman
Audiophile
Strength:
Natural, lovely sound; quite efficient; good looking speaker, nice sound stage.
Weakness:
not the most extended on top and bottom; slightly polite; large footprint. Very natural sounding and efficient speaker. Detail is natural rather than in-your-face. Does not plum the depth of bass. You can thoroughly enjoy natural sounding music with these speakers, and they image better than the Spendor box speakers. Overall a slightly warm, ripe sound. Similar Products Used: Proac, Thiel |
[Nov 18, 2001]
Benjamin Zwickel
Audiophile
Strength:
Smooth, liquid, accoustic sound. Seamless image. VERY accurate and flat response. Easy to listen to for hours on end. Excellent for accoustic music like light classical, jazz, and new age. Beautiful cabinets.
Weakness:
Some may find them a bit too "laid back". They lack the kind of "slam" in the bass and "edge" in the highs that many Since I have a close relationship with the owners of "high end" stores, I have spent HOURS with products in stores, and DAYS with the best of those products in my own home. I often have the option of taking home the floor demo products for the weekend to hear how they sound on my system. This has given me the oppertunity experiance many products over extended periods of time. Similar Products Used: Spendor 3/5, Accoustic Energy 1 & 2, Linn Kan & Sara 9, Scientific Fidelity Joule. |
[Apr 18, 2001]
David Elmgren
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Superb midrange, delightfully smooth high end, excellent
Weakness:
Next to the SP 100's their bass is not as deep. These came to me after I had pretty much disregarded them Similar Products Used: Spendor SP100, SP-1's, SP-2's, Sp-2/3's, BC -1's, BC-2's, LS35a's, numerous assorted B&W's, etc. Lots. |