Tannoy Churchill Floorstanding Speakers
Tannoy Churchill Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 12, 2000]
Dr. J
Audiophile
Strength:
Accurate, warm, inviting, singing furniture !
Weakness:
Very pricey ! I've never heard of huge speakers like the Tannoy Churchills performing a vanishing act! Similar Products Used: Thiel CS6, B&W 801, Wilson Watt, Dunlavy SC-VI, Martin-Logan SL3. |
[Mar 05, 2001]
paul ventura
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
They do sound great, are beautiful, and are very efficient
Weakness:
Value?!?!?!? I'm don't have an audiophile budget and am not used to speakers in this price range. However, my ears work just as well as any other critical listener's. I heard these speakers with McIntosh amplification at a local salon, using my own test cd. I expected to be blown away, and was severely disappointed. They are impressive in size and really do sound good, but they DON'T sound oh-my-god, I can see why people spend so much on these things wonderful. Makes me wonder if any of the ultra-high end stuff is worth it. I hope it is, but didn't see it in these speakers. |
[May 25, 2000]
Peter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Few
Weakness:
Overpriced I heard these for about 2 hours in a set up at a high fi store localy.Had about $50000 worth of amplification pre amp cd player dac and wires hooked up to it.Now i thought i was going to just get blown away.Well i sat there and liked what i heard but for the money.The speakers retail in the 20000 + mark in Canada.I wanted more.I have heard Logans,B&W, with lesser amplification sound better.My own system which is a Rogue Model 88 Tube Amp Rogue Model 66 Tube Pre Amp Mcintosh 7008 CD player Audioquest double run of Midnight and Coincident Speaker Technology Super Conquest loud spekers sounds pretty close.The Churchill was a little better in the bottom end but could not touch the Conquest in mid and high end.This is definitaly a product for those whose main objective is to brag about how much they spent on a system.Not for one who cares what his sound is like.Great sounding speaker but for 1/3 to 1/2 the money you can do much better. |
[Jan 06, 2002]
Mike
Audiophile
The Tannoy Churchill speakers are accurate, have great dynamics, are very sensitive (i.e., one watt of clean power is all you need to play them very loud), and are easy to listen to for long periods of time. The sound is well balanced throughout the frequency range. They sound good playing all kinds of music (e.g., classical, rock, jazz, etc.). Materials and workmanship are top notch. I listen to music nearly every day and am very happy with my Churchills. Similar Products Used: McIntosh MC2000 amplifier, Wadia 861 CD Player, Cardas Interconnects and cables |
[Sep 06, 1999]
Blair Zasitko
an Audiophile
The tannoy churchil, is at first sight, an imposingly large loudspeaker. They are really quite ugly, somewhat resembling a night club speaker that had been refinished with wood. You wont be buying this speaker for its looks. The sound, is also not so impressive, though almost any speaker in its price range will do some pretty interesting things. They disappeared at once, and the soundstage was quite 3D, but I found the sound to be a little dull, as there was no high frequency bite. There was next to no low bass at all, though this might have been due to the somewhat small room they were in. Overall, I cannot see why anyone would spend 14 000 dollars on this speaker, though I cannot say that under different circumstances the speaker might not be far more impressive. |
[May 18, 1999]
HD audio
an Audiophile
I heard the Tannoy Churchill with Manley electronics. The Churchill is a very large speaker. I think the speakers would sound much more impressive in a larger room than the one I listened to. I tend to be impressed by speakers that image well, the Churchill did not accomplish that, but they were still quite impressive to hear. I would like to listen to them in other surroundings before passing final judgement. |
[Feb 20, 2001]
Jim
Audiophile
Strength:
Point source with dual concentric drivers. Beautiful wood work. Very efficient especially for 300b amps. Biwiring and biamping. Adjustable damping for cabinet. Drivers are at listening level. Great imaging. Work best with cheap thick cables.
Weakness:
These are huge and tough to move around I have lived with these for almost 3 months now in both critical stereo listening mode and home theatre - I have 2 pair. In home theatre they are full range and image so well that I operate them in phantom centre channel and no sub - the processor mixing as appropriate into front and rear channels. I use Assemblage 300b's in stereo to biamp each speaker with amps 3 feet from each speaker - providing 18 wats per channel (ie left to hf and right to lf). 4 stereo amps provide incredible home theatre sound in 20ft by 30ft room with 8 ft ceiling. Front speakers work best and only bloom when 1/3 rule is used - 1/3 from side walls and 1/3 into room. Check out Cardas.com for speaker placement formulae. What took me weeks moving these lugs could have been done in 5 minutes if I had read the article beforehand. Used DH Labs speaker wire and was way too bright and midrange ring to it and found $.60 per foot stranded copper that was the perfect match - so much for good speaker cable. I removed all of the damping foam to get the right amount of bass for working with my 300b's. Although not as liquid in the midrange as my Quad USA Monitors, the Churchills have a very electrostic sound which actually sounds more correct. At 96db efficiency, these speakers rock with the 300b's. Most importantly I enjoy these in both Stereo and Home Theatre mode. By the way, the surrounds are located in the back corners about 3 feet out from the corner itself. Similar Products Used: Quad electrostics. Mated with Anthem AVM2 Processor and Arcom Diva DVD player using DH Labs interconnect with WBT connectors hand roled. |