Tannoy Mercury M4 Floorstanding Speakers
Tannoy Mercury M4 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 15, 2000]
Daniel Yeap
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
balanced frequencies reponse both for HiFi and AV/HT
Weakness:
Tweeter seemed have drop off at high end frequencies in SPL used with its crossover design in order to match the mid range response. Thus some people may find it not "sweet enough", but this attempt is the best setting up for both HiFi and HT : exciting wih minimum (acceptable) harsh sound. Value for money! Similar Products Used: Tannoy M2, R1, R2; Mission 702e, 77seires, BMW 601, 602, |
[Jul 08, 1999]
Ernesto A. Duronto
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought a pair of M4 following reviews from this page.From this day I can't stop listening different kind of music. |
[Oct 12, 2000]
Miguel Asadi
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Tight bass
Weakness:
none so far I had never felt my but shaking while watching a movie. They sound great for dance/trance and for rock music. Such a quality for such low costs. Great. Similar Products Used: b&w 600 |
[Jul 05, 2000]
Iman Budi Santoso
Casual Listener
Strength:
Warm sound, but clear midrange, tight and clean bass for acoustic instruments, and crisp enough treble
Weakness:
Cheap looking grill and emblem, and screw-type cable connection (which is a problem for thick Monster-type cable) I auditioned the Tannoy and the Yamaha in the store using a Yamaha amplifier in a stereo mode (no effect) and I like the Tannoy better. The Steely Dan "Gaucho" album, which I used to use to judge a stereo system, could not help much, but the vocal, guitar and violin in Guinga "Suite Leopoldina" album sounds distinctively loud and clear without being harsh out of the Tannoy, while with the NS-300 they sound nasal. Similar Products Used: Yamaha NS-300 |