Totem Acoustic Forest Floorstanding Speakers
Totem Acoustic Forest Floorstanding Speakers
[Oct 19, 1999]
JP
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
-Sweet, detailed and extended sound
Weakness:
-Mids and highs slightly less precise than Model 1, a reference in that matter. A truly musical speaker, especially with tube amps. I never experienced any muddy bass with it, even in smaller rooms. Last reviewer's problems must be an electronics mismatch with the speakers or funny room acoustics. |
[Jul 19, 2000]
Pat
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Indeed a an excellent floorstander! I need to set the record straight on my prior review of the Totem Forest. Upon returning the Forests to the dealer my comments regarding the speakers not measuring up to Totem's high performance standards were met with disbelief. Examination of the demo pair found them to be wired out of phase (evidently when a blown driver was replaced). This, of course, would cause pretty much the exact problems noted previously to be encountered. |
[Nov 14, 2001]
Paul
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Beautiful finish, Fabulous range, Quality components
Weakness:
Claws may not work so well on carpet? Well, since I purchased these second hand I avoided ALL the break in issues discussed. After using them for around two weeks and can safely say these are exceptional speakers both in sound reproduction and in build quality. Dynaudio drivers WBT binding posts..nuff said there..and take a look at the quality of finish on the cabinet. Sound stage is solid, imaging exceptional and the ability of these speakers to reproduce quality bass is unbelievable given the size of the cabinet. each instrument is separated well, distinctly noticeable and defined while still allowing the music to stay intact and complete as a whole. The highs are detailed and while there are certainly smoother speakers out there the music is brought to life which in the end is what its all about. Any review that does not rate these well is either a result of mismatched components or the afore mentioned break in issue. Give them a listen and they'll be on your short list! Listen to the whole collection again with a range and detail you've more than likely never heard. Great on all types of music but watch your the components you match them with. Similar Products Used: Proac Studio 125 |
[Jul 16, 2001]
Barnaby Ng
Audiophile
Strength:
Excellent build and finish, deep tight bass, and very musical. Although I've the Forest for over a year, I'm still not sure if they are broken in or not. When I play it really loud, I can SMELL freshly planned wood coming from the rear tune port :->. My speakers maybe a bit different because I've the base filled with sand, but you have to hear it to believe the bass coming out from such a small woofer. It is not only deep, but very controlled and musical. Just listen to Take Five, both the original and G. Washington's version. |
[Feb 09, 2001]
John
Audio Enthusiast
I heard these at the 2000 Montreal Audio show and was very impressed. With respect to the review immediately below, it seems a common observation that Totem speakers require a long break in period (up to 100 hours) and can sound quite shrill until this has been done. See for example the following review: http://www.totemacoustic.com/NewFiles/uhf-no-56.html#Anchor-14210 |
[Feb 03, 2001]
grewper
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
exceptional build quality, highly detailed sound, good low-end extension for a small floorstander
Weakness:
quite bright/harsh in the upper frequencies I really wanted to like these speakers based on beautiful aesthetic presentation and subperb build quality. However, listener fatigue set in fairly quickly for me due to perceived extreme brightness in the upper frequencies, regardless of the exceptional sonic detail they seemed to offer. Needless to say, they were "unhooked" after a few tracks. Bass response, though, is worthy of mention. Similar Products Used: smallish floorstanders including JMlab Cobalt 810/815/820, ProAc Response 1.5, Aerial Model 6, Joseph RM22si, Vienna Acoustics Mozart, Soliloquy 5.3, others |
[Apr 01, 1999]
Bill Goldberg
an Audio Enthusiast
I heard these speakers today (driven by Bryston amplification) and was not impressed. They may have had deep bass, sounded very smooth, imaged very well but they also sounded warm. Totem claims that their speakers recreate the live experience. I have been to many concerts and live music does not sound like the Forests's portrayal at all. |
[Aug 15, 1999]
an Audiophile
Seeing only four comments about this superb speaker prompted me to make a contributon. I am an audio dealer and of course, a hobbyist too. In my home-based business, I usually have about 20 or so pairs of speakers up and running or in the wings. That simply means that I can immediately compare products with each other. The Forests are some of the most superb speakers I have ever had around here. They do all the audiophile things people write about, they are just gorgeous in their cherry finish, but most importantly, they will sit you down for long listening sessions. I don't much care what type of music it is, and my customers bring plenty of varieties, the Forests just sing it out. These speakers are also small in a room. They are about as small a footprint as anything else, only about 34 inches tall yet they play very dynamically. I have used the Rogue Audio gear with wonderful results, Copland, Monarchy, all of it sounds just so good. The Forests are close to "all anyone could want" but they get an overall rating of four stars from me simply because the only product I could give five stars to would be the Wisdom Adrenaline system--it is in fact, a "STATE OF THE ART" system and I think only such systems as it should ever get five stars. The Forest is a speaker for the serious listener who wants realism, value, refinement, aesthetics, and musicality in a surprisingly small package. Overall rating, FOUR STARS. |
[Sep 09, 1999]
Matt
an Audio Enthusiast
After several months of auditioning, I have settled on the Totem Forests as my next loudspeaker. The short list came down to:B+W Nautilus 804 |
[Jul 25, 2001]
Mark
Audiophile
Strength:
Deep base, full range, nice finish and cabinets
Weakness:
expencive for its class, long long long break-in time, low positioned On the first day of hooking them up with my system that I'll describe bellow, I've heard only "boom" and "tss" -- midrange was shallow and lifeless something like in cheep studio or concert monitors. I was quite upset that $3000 speakers couldn't outperform Tannoy R2 in terms of midrange. The "boom" was quite impressive. The "tss" was dynamic but unstable, discreet and somewhat oscilating. There were a 2-3 weeks of continuous after work listening. Every day after the first week gave a step towards "the midrange awaiking". Every day after the second week gave a dramatic high range improvement towards stability and softness. Finally after 3 weeks the bass had also greatly improved in terms of detailability and depth. So as I see these speakers demand a patience from the buyer till they break-in. Similar Products Used: Vandersteen 1ce, Tannoy R2, Kef Reference 3 |