Vandersteen 2Ce Floorstanding Speakers
Vandersteen 2Ce Floorstanding Speakers
[Feb 25, 2000]
Dave
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Balance; coherence; bass
Weakness:
Input jacks There isn't much I can add that haven't been said before about how good these speakers are, except I don't think enough credit has been given Richard Vandersteen for using common sense in sticking with a minimum phase crossover, which I believe is largely responsible for the speaker's coherence, longterm musicality, and commercial success (over 100,000 sold I'm told). I say this because it is a fact that the human ear is not so much an amplitude device as it is a time device. Similar Products Used: PSB Gold i; NHT 2.9 |
[Jun 13, 2001]
Joe Giacalone
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Seems to get better with every electronic or interconnect upgrade
Weakness:
none that stand out These are speakers I've had for 8 years and seem to improve with each upgrade I've made to my system. Every time I think I've outgrown The Vandys and begin fantasizing about 'better' speakers, my budget dictates that I make modest, and more affordable, improvements. And, with each of these less costly upgrades, I've found the Vandys to produce siginificantly better and more satisfying sound. Similar Products Used: Polk SDS |
[Jun 05, 1997]
Charles Purvis Kelly, Jr.
a Casual Listener
The current incarnation of this speaker is the second I've heard since it was introduced more than four-and-a-half years ago. The first being its predecessor, the model 2Ci, which I've heard for the first time back in the fall of 1990. The very thing I like about this speaker is that even though it doesn't excell in any one particular area, it's a very good speaker when it is taken as a whole. Yes, the top end is slightly rolled off, but to these 34 year old ears, that's a good thing. Also, the midrange is open and transparent and the bass response is extended, but could be tighter. This may have something to do with the amplifiers, front-end components, and/or cables that they're connected to. Overall, these speakers take on a warm, but rich sounding demeanor. Because of this, I'll have to disagree with past magazine reviewers and area dealers in reference to what type of amplification that they should be mated with. Past reviewers and some dealers tend to mate the 2Ce's with tube amplification. I feel that tube amps tend to exhibit a warm, rich, type of sound themselves, further tilting the already warm balance of the 2Ce's. I feel to get the very best from this speaker, they should be mated with a slightly bright and open sounding amplifier with a neutral sounding and uncolored preamplifier and high quality front-end sources and cables elsewhere in the system chain. If this is done, then you'll agree with my assessment. Surely, I've also heard other speakers in this price range that were in one way or another, were better than the Vandersteen 2Ce's. They may exhibit a clearer or more extended top end, a more uncolored or more neutral midrange, they deliver a better soundstage, or they may deliver more depth and hear through quality to the back of the stage, but I have yet to find one that does everything the Vandersteens does in this price range, The beauty of it all is that the Vandersteens don't do anything terribly wrong, and for the price, they're hard to beat. That's why they're going to be my next pair of speakers (they're going to replace a pair of KEF Reference 102's as I attempt to overhaul my existing audio system). They are going to be the cornerstone of my $10K audio system (see dream system "$10,000.00 System Revised Again"). So, if you're looking to reproduce the full audio spectrum from your system and do not want the hassle of trying to match a subwoofer to a pair of bookshelf satelites, then do yourself a favor and check out the Vandersteen 2Ce's. They're very good speaker for the money. |
[Jun 05, 1997]
Charles Purvis Kelly, Jr.
a Casual Listener
The current incarnation of this speaker is the second I've heard during the four plus years it was out. The first being its predecessor, the 2Ci. The very things I like about this speaker is that even though it doesn't excell any particular area, it's a very good speaker when taken as a whole. The top end is slightly rolled off, but the midrange is open and transparent and the bass response is extended, but could be tighter. But then again, this may have something to do with the amplifiers, front-end components, or cables that they're connected to. Overall, this speaker takes on a warm, but rich demeanor. Because of this I will have to disagree as to what type of amplification that they should be mated with. To get the best from this speaker, I think it should be mated with a slightly bright an open sounding amplifier and a neutral and uncolored preamp with high quality sources and cables elsewhere in the system chain. If this is done, then you'll agree with my assessment. Surely, I've heard speakers in this price range that were better in some areas than the Vandersteens, but the beauty of the Vandersteens are is that they don't do anything terribly wrong, and for the price, you can't beat them. If your looking to reproduce the full audio spectrum from your system and do not want the hassle of matching a subwoofer to a pair bookshelf satelites, then do yourself a favor and check out the Vandesteen 2Ce's. They're very good speakers for the price. |
[Sep 13, 2000]
John Dooley
Audiophile
Strength:
Clarity, Purity, and Balance
Weakness:
None that I could remember I don't own these fine speakers, but I had a friend that own them for about 5 years that helped me start my audio-mania. I did the mistake of buying the Polk Audio SDS-2 instead, which were fine at the time because of my limited knowledge, but now I feel that I had missed something all these years. The Vandersteen's were more fine tuded then the Polk's, and one could hear the different instruments more clearly. My friend had the Vandersteens's hooked up to a Carver holographic pre-amp and Adcom amp and we spent many hours listening to them. Later my friend bought the Martin Logan Aerius and I bought the Martin Logan SL-3 and we both feel that we made a leap forward in clarity. I was thinking of buying some Vandersteen's for my bedroom as a back-up speaker, but the local dealer in Orange country went out of business and the wide front cover would not fit well in my room. Lately I have been testing NHT products and I ended up buying the NHT VT-2 (see review) because the 10 inch woofer plays side ways, with the tweeters playing frontwards within a 6 inch wide screen, which makes it easy to place in my bedroom. Therefore it was not sound quality that stopped me from buying the Vandersteens's, but the design of the NHT's that made my final choice. Over all a good starting high end product or back up speaker, and I need a larger bedroom. Similar Products Used: Martin Logan Aerius & SL-3, NHT 2.9 & VT-2, Polk SDS-2 |
[Nov 07, 1999]
Mark W.
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent Soundstaging, Upper registers not overly crisp
Weakness:
Slightly lacking in mid-bass articulation, Low efficiency requires higher wattages for equivalent performance to many other speakers. Must be considered among the top contenders in the "bang per buck" category. Wonderful speaker for AC-3 when paired with Vandy center, surround, and Subwoofer. MidBass could be tighter, but when Vandersteen's unique high impedance internally-amplified Subwoofer is incorporated into the system, allowing for more amplifier dedication into the 100+Hz ranges, this problem is improved substantially. I currently push mine with a Parasound 140WPC amplifier (L,R,C) and wouldn't recommend much less power for these relatively inefficient loudspeakers. Overall, a VERY impressive product relative to its price point. |
[Dec 27, 1998]
curious
an Audio Enthusiast
there are such extreme differences in the reviews here most are really good with a few very bad, I own a pair of 2ce's and like them. I think they are very accurate and do not have any of the negative characteristics that a few of the reviews state(ie.fatiguing or over stated mid)maybe it would be important to know what is driving these speakers when we are giving our reviews.sounds more like bad amps or recievers maybe. if you have a weak or mid line reciever these probably arent the speaker for you but if you have high end reciever or good amp running these they are very good.all the the reveiws done by diff. mags and people who are in the know usually say these dont have any obvious faults and this is what makes them such a good speaker.I run mine with a yamaha 992 and a sunfire cinema grand amp and couldnt be happier. |
[Jan 07, 2002]
Charles
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Natural, balanced, cost-effective, honest (if that is a way to describe audio products), suprising strong bass.
Weakness:
Size, looks. At this price point, there are no complaints about the sound. This a review for the 2Ce or 2Ce Signature. Similar Products Used: I auditioned the following in deatil before buying: B&W, Martin Logan, PSB, and Paradigm. |
[Apr 10, 1998]
MTL
an Audiophile
Vandersteen 2Ce |
[Mar 13, 1998]
allan
an Audio Enthusiast
I just bought a new pair of vandersteen 2ce speackers but i'm having a hardtime looking for a good quality and compatible amplifier. Considering the |