VMPS Tower Two Special Edition Floorstanding Speakers
VMPS Tower Two Special Edition Floorstanding Speakers
[Nov 02, 2001]
chris shaver
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Dynamics AND subtle nuances
Weakness:
Imposing appearance These speakers are wonderful. I bought this pair of Tower II SE's from an audiophile/cabinet maker who had upgraded them to all carbon fiber drivers and rebuilt the cabinets with better bracing and sound deadening. The speakers now weigh 190 lbs each. Similar Products Used: Martin Logan Sequel II, Vandersteen 2ce, Mirage M1 |
[Jun 08, 2000]
Audioenthusiast
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Bass response, imaging
Weakness:
Recessed midrange, poor midrange balance These speakers have great flat, unexaggerated bass response. Furthermore, their imaging is excellent despite their size. However, their midrange presence and listenability is weak compared to my other speakers. The sound of the piano is much more listenable and realistic on my Cantons than on the VMPS. However, they serve as excellent home theater speakers. Similar Products Used: B7W 602, Canton Le900 |
[Oct 02, 2000]
Greg
Audiophile
Strength:
bass power and authority, ability to play loud and clean, well balanced, full range floor standing speaker with no need for subwoofer, very efficient.
Weakness:
Does best with amps of 150 watts or more. Need an amp that can power a 4 ohm load easily for best results. Not the smoothest treble response compared to newer design speakers. I directly compared the VMPS tower II se's to PSB stratus gold i speakers in house on my system for several months. I have to admit I liked the smoother more forgiving treble response of the PSB goldi's on some cd's playing classical symphony type music. They seemed to mask that cd harshness better and I ended up buying more classical music because of this. On well recorded cd's I prefer the sound of the VMPS. They seem to have the full frequency of sound covered best, especially when you turn up the volume. The PSB golds seem to smooth out the frequency extremes too much for me. When there were bass lines in the music they were much easier to follow and more involving with the VMPS. The VMPS were more dynamic of the two. I did not enjoy turning up the volume above medium levels with the PSB's, there signature sound did not sound real at all. They kept there warm midrange, but the upper frequencies became too subdued and did not have bass power or slam. I felt like I needed a much more powerful amp to drive them, but they sounded the same way at a dealers store using a very powerful McIntosh amp. I bought the psb gold i's for tighter, punchier bass and I thought there smoother treble response would help me enjoy some of the brighter sounding recordings I own as well as improve definition and control in some of the boomy sounding cd's. This however did not happen. Poor overly bright recordings of pop music as well as overly bloated bass remained and the music I enjoy most lost its appeal. The PSB goldi's are long time Stereophile Class B speakers and I believe the VMPS tower IIse's are even better in my book. Natalie Cole's voice in Unforgettable is too nasal and shouty when turned up on the PSB's. On the VMPS Tracy Chapman, Sinatra, Elvis, Lyle Lovett as well as country music singers voices come across rich and full, filling the room with more natural sound. I also prefered the wall of sound that comes from the VMPS as opposed to the PSB. The VMPS sound wave comes at you wider and with more energy. It reminds me more of the sound and energy heard at a live concert be it a small stage at the fair or a concert hall. They are both on the warm side of neutral but some how the PSB came across a little thin because they could not match the bass power and definition of the VMPS. Two 10inch woofers are no match for 4 active and 2 passive 12 inch woofers in the VMPS. As far as dissapearing acts go, they both were capable given a good recording. The VMPS gives a more forward and alive you are there presence. On grand piano the VMPS capture the power of the instrument much better especially lower key notes which seem to be in the living room. On rock music with electric guitar the sound could jump out unnaturally with the PSB's not even sounding as part of the band. With the VMPS it still sounded like a guitar, but part of the music. The VMPS may sound recessed to some not used to such bass power but I believe they are better balanced from top to bottom with a wider range of music and with SACD here smoothing out cd harshness and adding deeper more defined bass I have to say I'll upgrade my VMPS to the VMPS ribbon monitor II and sell the PSB's. Since the PSB are class B contenders and I felt I could not part with the VMPS I have to give the VMPS tower IIse's *****(five) stars. I bought the PSB's to replace my old and worn VMPS tower IIse's but did now hear improvement in the areas that are important to me. If the VMPS were auditioned by Stereophile they would be rated a great bargain and highly recommended as well (IMHO). Maybe even class A with there new design ribbon mids and tweets. Stereophile will probally never audition them though because they do not audition mail order companies. For lovers of deep, powerful bass in a well balanced speaker with the ability to play at live listening levels this has got to be one of "the best" speakers out there for the sound and the value. Also the owner and designer is so accessible and helpful it makes buying them from a smaller lesser known company so much fun! VMPS ribbon technology is considered to be a new state of the art by several popular reviewers. Contact VMPS audio for info. at www.VMPSaudio.com Similar Products Used: JBL's, Wharfedales, Cerwin Vegas, Altec Lansing, ESS heils, PSB stratus gold I's and silvers, Paradigm 9semkII, VMPS mini towers and various Infinity, Martin Logan, Wilson, Klipsh, Polk Audio, Bose, Meridian. |