Wharfedale Emerald 93 Floorstanding Speakers
Wharfedale Emerald 93 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Oct 05, 2002]
bgurber
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean, clear and realistic sound, Gorgeous real rosewood finish, Excellent build quality, Bi-wire connections!, 5 year warranty!
Weakness:
Needs a little space from the wall, other than that flawless! From the moment you open the box you understand why someone would pay close to a $1000 for these speakers. The Emerald 93's are nothing short of stunning! The craftsmanship and the real rosewood finish is more like something would expect to see on a hand crafted dinning room table. The speaker is beautifully ported in the back and includes gold plated bi-wire connections. Now besides the impressive construction, these speakers can really sing! I have them bi-wired(Highly recommended, but not necessary) with Monster Z2 bi-wire cables to a Yamaha R-V1105(The most underated receiver ever in its price range (>$800); I have had mine for 6 monthes and decided to buy another new for $275)Vocals and acoustic guitars on the Emeralds sound so clear and clean you'd swear they were right in front of you! The midrange & bass response is strong and tight(Maybe too strong if you have them close to the wall). For HT they perform as well if not better than stereo. The funny thing is I only stumbled over these speakers messing around on Ubid and they have now replaced my PSB Century 800i tower speakers as my mains! Yes, the 800i's have more bass, but on 24' stands the 93's have superior clarity and presence. Bottom line, for the price, these speakers are HANDS DOWN THE BEST SPEAKERS you will ever buy! They are even worth paying the retail value of around $500 for the rosewood finish. But do a little research and you can get them for a steal! Similar Products Used: JBL N28II, PSB Century 800i, Wharfedale Diamond 8.1 |
[Dec 07, 2001]
readyfreddy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sound, price, looks
Weakness:
need some power to drive I agree with the previous two reviewers. I need to upgrade the HT system in my bedroom. I hooked up the speakers to a Pioneer Dolby Pro Logic receiver using OEM interconnects, cheap 18 guage speaker wires, Apex 1500 DVD and an awful JVC Cd player. Right away I noticed a huge difference in sound over the Fisher speakers. As crappy as the sources were, the speakers actually sound listenable. It had good imaging, decent bass, and a smooth highs (not upfront and shouty like most mini monitors I have heard). Similar Products Used: klipsch, paradigm, Fisher |
[Dec 01, 2001]
ross
Audiophile
Strength:
looks, sound, bargain town price, over achiever
Weakness:
construction/materials not on par with Wharfedale's hype on being their top of the line reference series Hard to consider buying something without hearing? Let me help you out if you are considering buying these speakers thru UBID and wondering about what exactly you can expect. I will also include the Center Channel review. Similar Products Used: Klipsch RB5, Klipsch SB2, Paradigm MiniMonitor, Paradigm Titan, B&W 303, PSB 3LR |
[Nov 10, 2001]
Jones
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
defined sound, nice midbass detail and very room-filling.
Weakness:
A bit high sounding for my tastes. Not much high imaging. A very good speaker, not great, but it is a great value. Sounds better than the other speakers in its size. A very spacey sound to the highs. Midbass reponse had a nice accuracy to it. The highs sounded a bit overwhelming, but lack imaging(almost sounding like a live recording). It has an airy sound and seems best for LARGE rooms. For the money though, they are great speakers. Good for most music except some rock. Sounds very good with acoustical and detailed music(classical & jazz). Suffers under "pressure" of rock at times. Under about $500 there is not much, if any, that will beat it "hands down". For the money, $80 + $50 shipping, I can't complain. A different sound than the norm for most bookshelf speakers. Similar Products Used: boston cr-6, jbl s-38, polk rt-35i, infinity il-30 |
[Dec 04, 2001]
Gary
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great sound
Weakness:
Hard rock is not this speakers forte' I agree with many of the points presented by the previous reviewer.In short,you would have to spend two or three times the $ to get a better sounding speaker, but; Similar Products Used: yes |
[Oct 30, 2001]
jeffry
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent clarity, accuracy, balance. Attractive cabinet.
Weakness:
Could go lower in the bass range, but not at the price of ruining the seamless presentation of what it does produce. For the price I paid for these speakers, I have never been more satisfied. Describing the sound is difficult, but they seem to be the most accurate and precise imaging speakers I have heard for less than $500 a pair. I have no experience with actual studio monitors commanding prices of hundreds of dollars each, but I assume those would have to possess the characteristics these possess. Seamless, great detail, excellent dispersion, absent of listening fatigue, and able to do what they do effortlessly. When played at higher volumes they become larger, not louder, as do all superb speakers. I have them paired with two Emerald 95's and the bass is handled by my sub. The sub, an Onkyo with two side firing 8" woofers, pushed by a true high current 120 watt amp and reaches a true 25hz combines beautifully with these. (I have owned other decent 15",12", and 10" subs with amps up to 200 watts which do not sound as good) What I now realize is that this setup does not suffer from the slight muddiness present when one combines a sub with woofers from the mains which compete a bit with the sub to produce the low frequencies. The bass (handled mainly by the sub)now has more clarity and depth and the slight muddiness I had experienced before is now gone. (I had thought the extra bass was attactive until now)I honestly do not believe that in my 55 years, I have ever heard better for the $500 or so I have invested in this setup. It is amazing and do not let me forget to credit the Emerald 95's which do present a bit greater depth than the 93's but sound so similar otherwise. Similar Products Used: Vandersteen,JBL, Infinity, Pinnacle, AR, Whafedale and others. |
[Feb 09, 1999]
Bonson Yee
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought a pair of these relatively cheap on the internet, having never even listened to them in person. At first I didn't like these speakers at all, mainly because they're almost exactly opposite of my current main speakers (Definitive Technology BP30's), with a very laid back sound, a lot less bass (well, they're bookshelves so its expected), and less detail. I've owned the BP30's for less than a year but absolutely love them in my home theater setup...but have almost totally ignored listening to music because after an hour or so they would give you an earache. The wharfedales (hooked up to a denon avr1100) sounded really dull at first but after about 20-30 hours of play, they became the absolute most beautiful musical speakers I have ever heard and were so easy on the ears its soothing. The drivers are matched perfectly and have a seamless sound...acoustic guitars, pianos, violins, and drums sound amazing on these as well as vocals. Out of the box, you would never believed you paid $899/pr retail for them because they are quite light, the wood seems thin, the grill is flimsy and poorly glued onto a plastic (removable) frame. It does however come with really nice all metal binding posts that allow biwiring. They do look very nice and classy and would look great in any room. Even though the emerald 93's lack a small bit of detail when compared to the bp30's, you wouldn't be missing out on much (except for an earache). I do 100% of my music listening on these as they still amaze me to this day, but I would not use these as main home theater speakers even with a well matched sub. The definitive bp30's can give you a really exciting experience depending on the movie, but the wharfedales just don't seem to move you when watching movies. I know there's a lot of people that say the whole movie/music speaker argument is mostly just talk, but after listening to the wharfedales compared to the bp30's, I am thoroughly convinced that a speaker can excel in one area and be completely awful in another. Definitely would buy another pair of these, especially at a discount price. |
[Feb 09, 1999]
Bonson Yee
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought a pair of these relatively cheap on the internet, having never even listened to them in person. At first I didn't like these speakers at all, mainly because they're almost exactly opposite of my current main speakers (Definitive Technology BP30's), with a very laid back sound, a lot less bass (well, they're bookshelves so its expected), and less detail. I've owned the BP30's for less than a year but absolutely love them in my home theater setup...but have almost totally ignored listening to music because after an hour or so they would give you an earache. The wharfedales (hooked up to a denon avr1100) sounded really dull at first but after about 20-30 hours of play, they became the absolute most beautiful musical speakers I have ever heard and were so easy on the ears its soothing. The drivers are matched perfectly and have a seamless sound...acoustic guitars, pianos, violins, and drums sound amazing on these as well as vocals. Out of the box, you would never believed you paid $899/pr retail for them because they are quite light, the wood seems thin, the grill is flimsy and poorly glued onto a plastic (removable) frame. It does however come with really nice all metal binding posts that allow biwiring. They do look very nice and classy and would look great in any room. Even though the emerald 93's lack a small bit of detail when compared to the bp30's, you wouldn't be missing out on much (except for an earache). I do 100% of my music listening on these as they still amaze me to this day, but I would not use these as main home theater speakers even with a well matched sub. The definitive bp30's can give you a really exciting experience depending on the movie, but the wharfedales just don't seem to move you when watching movies. I know there's a lot of people that say the whole movie/music speaker argument is mostly just talk, but after listening to the wharfedales compared to the bp30's, I am thoroughly convinced that a speaker can excel in one area and be completely awful in another. Definitely would buy another pair of these, especially at a discount price. |
[Mar 24, 1999]
Mike Craig
an Audio Enthusiast
The Emerald 93 represents the bookshelf offering of Wharfedale's EmeraldCollection. Constructed in an attractive Rosewood, Cherry, Light Oak or |
[Dec 26, 2000]
Andrew Taylor
Casual Listener
Strength:
Great Value and Handsome Design
Weakness:
Fragile Grills (so I've read), not carried at many stores (for listening). I am not an audiophile by any stretch. However I am a carefull consumer and like to research before I buy. I was impressed by all of the good reviews I saw for Wharfedale speakers and really liked the classic appearance of the Emerald series. I was also intrigued by the prospect of getting a deal on the internet (u-bid sells alot of Wharfedale speakers). I purchased mine online for $250.00 from a website (super web specials I think). Run a search on Google for Wharfedale. They offer nearly all of the Wharfedale line....These speakers sound great,they may lack Deep Bass (I haven't noticed),but I was planning to get a sub anyway. I would describe the sound as laid back, warm and easy to listen to. Which does not necessarily describe my taste in music. I have listened to other comparably priced speakers in stores (Sony, Yamaha, JBL)and feel that I have gotten a better sounding speaker for the money. Similar Products Used: My old speakers...40W Realistic circa 1980. |