Cambridge Soundworks Powered Subwoofer Subwoofers
Cambridge Soundworks Powered Subwoofer Subwoofers
[Nov 20, 1998]
Tristan Sitzman
an Audiophile
The CSW Powered sub is fantastic. It blew away all other subs I have listened to. Very very accurate base response all the way down to 30hrz! For $700 I felt like I was stealing the thing. Bravo on a fantastic piece! |
[Dec 30, 1998]
Anthony Cummins
an Audio Enthusiast
Cambridge Soundworks Powered Subwoofer 1 |
[Dec 26, 1998]
an Audio Enthusiast
I give it 3 stars but there are much better subs for the same price. I saw a 15 inch 500w rated sub for only $370. I heard it and it was ear busting at only a fraction of a way up. Just then It was easily pushing more spl at 20 Hz than the powered or slave could all the way up. I didn't dare turn it any higher even though it could of gone much higher. Thats just what this sub did in a store in a large, cement floored room. Cerwin Vega also makes much better subs. Their HTS-15 has an spl over 120db. It has a 15 inch floor firing sub and a 200 watt amplifyer. |
[Jan 04, 1999]
Tan
an Audio Enthusiast
I agree with Brian about this Cambridge SoundWorks powered subwoofer 1a. It sucks. I had to trade in for 300$ credit at Cookin' which I bought for 600$. It is a piece of garbage, bottom out too easily, when you listen to DVD music, it is a disaster because it sounds too muddy, like crap. Stay away, Go listen to a velodyne subwoofer at your local Circuit City. |
[Dec 30, 1998]
Brian
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had quite a long, painstaking experience with cambridge's subwoofer line. I can in no way recommend this sub, much less any other from this company for a few VERY important reasons: |
[Jun 17, 1999]
Dan
an Audio Enthusiast
This is more an update then a new review, anyway this weekend I added the Slave Sub to the PSW1. |
[Jul 04, 1999]
R. Rivera
an Audio Enthusiast
This subwoofer is excellent. I have not heard any subwoofer come close to matching its overall balance of volume, accuracy, and construction quality under $1000. The bass is low, powerful, and tight, with just a hint of excessive warmness in the lowest registers. The design is refreshing, since no other company seems to want to drift from the "cube" shape. Overall, this sub gives the most bang for the buck that I've heard (both quality and quantity). |
[Aug 13, 1999]
RReid
an Audio Enthusiast
Ten years ago, I ordered a CSW Powered sub with non-powered twin originally. I returned the twin and bought another powered unit to have a stereo pair of subs. The auto switch-on feature (which powers up the subs when a signal is detected) would occasionally switch on and off as if finding and losing a signal. The techs at CSW bypassed this auto switch on, so the subs power up or off when my receiver is switched on or off. Another note is these subs make a low-level hum when no signal is being played, something that's probably there all the time, but noticeable on occasion. The hum cannot be heard while music or DVDs are being played, even during quiet selections and scenes. |
[Nov 27, 1999]
ROGER KLAUE
Audiophile
Strength:
TOP NOTCH PERFORMER FOR DETAILED MUSICAL BASS,TIGHT AND ACCURATE, NEVER FATIGUING. AND THERE IS SO MUCH POWER THAT I CANNOT FIND A 5.1 SOUNDTRACK THAT IT CANNOT MASTER WITH ROOM SHAKING BASS AT 30% POWER.
Weakness:
NONE IF YOU WANT THE BEST BANG FOR THE BUCK, THIS IS IT. AUDIOPHILE MUSICAL PERFORMANCE, AND ROOM SHAKING,WINDOW RATTLING OUTPUT ON 5.1 SOUNDTRACKS. |
[Feb 19, 1999]
Sam Bridger
an Audio Enthusiast
Great sub.....Awesome power, delivers the goods where it counts |