HSU Research STF-2 Subwoofers

HSU Research STF-2 Subwoofers 

DESCRIPTION

Powered bass-reflex subwoofer, ±2dB at 25Hz, 10" driver, 200W amplifier, On/Auto/Off power switch, continuously variable 30-90Hz bypassable crossover at 24dB/octave rolloff, 0/180° phase toggle switch, removeable power cord, 19"H x 14"W x 18"D, shipping weight 52 lbs.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 20  
[Jul 06, 2021]
stussy


Strength:

tree service luton provide quality professional and affordable tree removal by a fully licenced, insured and experienced team.

Weakness:

none so far

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Jul 04, 2021]
ZenLunatic


Strength:

I just have to respond to the idiot from 2012 complaining about HSU subs and their customer service. He is astounded that he had to pay for shipping to send the plate amp back to HSU. He fails to say that his subwoofer was out of warranty, so actually HsU taking a look at it at all is great customer service. The cherry on top of this D-bag complaining is that he’s pissed they sent him a new amp board and he had to install it himself. GTFOH. Christ. Ignore This D bag, please.

Weakness:

Strength-good customer service Weaknesses- sometimes d-bags buy your product

OVERALL
RATING
5
[May 05, 2021]
rosendamanns


Strength:

Not hard to position. Very musical. Inexpensive. Disappears with excellent blending. | Popcorn Ceiling Removal

Weakness:

no weakness in performance.

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
4
[Feb 19, 2012]
TBSWV
Audio Enthusiast

I would NEVER purchase another HSU product. After about three months of moderate listening in a stereo setup the sub just quit. I checked the fuse and it was not blown. Turns out the amp was toast. I contacted HSU Research and the tech casually requested that I remove the amp board and ship to them. Of course I had to pay for the shipping back to CA. Why should I pay for shipping their defective amp after a new purchase? They need to do a better job at quality control. They did send a replacement amp board in a reasonable time frame and I had to install the board myself. The sub functioning as it should but compared to my 1990 Velodyne it is boomy with no real bass extension. Not recommended!

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
2
[Dec 31, 2010]
ptople
Casual Listener

I just received the STF-2 . I was not prepared for the sound this unit produces. Watching Transformers in BlueRay shook the walls, floor and couch and I was only on level 2. Be prepared to rock your house with this unit.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 22, 2008]
kugs22
AudioPhile

Strength:

Lotsa bass, lotsa deep tones. Probably good for HT.

Weakness:

See above.

I've been at the two-channel audio hobby now for over twenty years, and have had a number of high-end systems. That includes some expensive subs as well. My present system is more modest, and I review this sub in that context. I am a firm believer in dual subs (if you're doing subs), and bought two STF-2 subs to upgrade from a pair of Cambridge Soundworks BassCube 10s.
The Cambridge subs took about an hour to set up. After that, no room nodes, no "hearing the sub," nothing but good bass, well integrated with my Tyler Taylo reference monitors. They worked well with five different amps I had. Weren't the deepest or the best textured, but their errors were basically those of omission only.

The Hsus were impossible to integrate, either singly or in a pair. I tried for three weeks to find any spot, any setting, any cable that would make them integrate, all to no avail. My suspicion is that these subs would be very nice for HT, but they are, in my view, NOT musical subs, and have no place in a quality music system.

They made "low sounds." In fact, they tended to over-emphasize the 40-80hz range. Because they do not have an adjustable phase, I was limited in what I could do for integrating these things.

The bass was substantial, prodigious, and tuneful. However, it did not match the bass from the mains in any respect, using either sub-outs from the amp or line level feeds. It was simply bass "doing its own thing." The notes were not continuations of instruments - rather, they were simply "deep tones."

I contacted Dr. Hsu, and he emailed me with some ideas to assist me in integrating these subs, which I appreciated. However, his suggestions didn't work.

I then decided to return them. With shipping both ways, I was out about $200 for this experiment. Okay, that's how it goes sometimes. I understood the deal going in, so that was okay.

However, after not receiving my money back, I contacted Dr. Hsu and was told that it was the busy Christmas season and he'd get to my return when he could. I really didn't appreciate that response, and told him so. He then proceeded to tell me how he'd taken his time to assist me, and asked me, "how many other presidents of companies would do that?" I was stunned by this response. In twenty years of this hobby, I've dealt with at least a dozen "presidents of companies," including the president of the company whose speakers I presently own, and the president of the company whose amp I own. I really did not appreciate the attitude that an Audio God had deigned to assist a customer out of his own benificence. The up-end audio market is filled with qualified engineers like Dr. Hsu following their passion and trying to make a living - including responding to customer inquiries and taking out the trash.

I would also point out that Dr. Hsu states in his literature that if you own dual subs, they should be placed next to each other. I actually tried that, with disastrous results. I would additionally point out that there is no other sub manufacturer or audio critic I know of who takes this "position on position" of dual subs. There are a number of technical articles available on the net concerning this issue, and they invariably choose one of two set-ups: 1. Both on the front wall, with each one outside the plane of the main speakers or 2. immediately behind or adjacent to each main speaker. The idea is to get stereo bass, which is impossible to do with Dr. Hsu's recommmendation. Doug Blackburn has written about this in the SoundStage archives, and there is an excellent article on the 6 Moons site at www.6moons.com/audioreviews/vb...

I am therefore left with three reasons I did not enjoy my "Hsu experience." First and foremost, I think if you are interested in music reproduction with anything approaching accuracy, you can do better...and you can do better for the money. Second, I'm not at all sure Dr. Hsu is correct in his sub theories, if his placement recommendations are so different from the mainstream for stereo subs. Third, although I appreciated his support, I actually (I know this may be hard to believe) EXPECT support on a purchase at retail price from the manufacturer. His response to my request for a return of my money was less than stellar, in my view.

I went on to buy a used Alon Thunderbolt sub with an adjustable phase, which took about 20 minutes to integrate. I was biding my time for the second one, which I got about a week ago. I did have to fiddle for another half hour or so to get them right. Are they perfectly right? No - I'll continue to refine them over time. Are they listenable? Yes. Were the Hsus listenable? No. So, I've used subs both substantially cheaper and substantially more expensive than the Hsus in my music room, without major difficulties of any kind.

Under all of these circumstances, I cannot recommend either this particular sub, or the line itself. I did not appreciate begging for my return or being treated as if I should have been honored to receive some set up assistance from Dr. Hsu - who basically runs the place himself. As I mentioned to him, if he hired additional customer support staff, he would never have had to take his valuable time to assist me.

My rating pertains to music only; these may be perfectly fine for HT, which I didn't try.

Customer Service

See above.

Similar Products Used:

REL, Velodyne, Alon/Nola.

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
[Apr 03, 2007]
Steven Rosburg
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

None for this price range, especially for what I use it for.

After my AR-30 subwoofer developed an annoyed low-frequency hum, I decided it was time to dump it and find a reasonably priced replacement. I decided on the HSU for the following reasons:

1. Relatively compact footprint and light weight
2. Cost
3. Musicality

This subwoofer does not disappoint. I use this purely for music, and it blends wonderfully, much easier and more naturally than my AR-30 -- regardless of whether the volume is subtle or cranked. It can hit the deepest "natural" piano and bass notes (non-synthesized) with absolute purity, there is no "boominess" whatsoever.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 25, 2006]
Wade
AudioPhile

Strength:

Not hard to position. Very musical. Inexpensive. Disappears with excellent blending.

Weakness:

black-box, like most others. no weakness in performance.

My first mistake was purchasing a sub without checking reviews. I purchased a Velodyne DPS10 for $500 and found it to be very boomy, and not very musical. I think it would be superb in a home theater system, but for music, it lacks. I took it back, looked at online reviews and found the Hsu STF-2 for a hundred dollars less. As people have stated, it works wonderfully in a 2 channel audio system. It disappears in the room, blends with the primary speakers excellently, is not boomy, just well defined. I keep the volume at around the 10 o'clock position most of the time. The crossover is variable down to 30 Hz, which is where I put mine, so my Meadowlarks can play to their fullest. I listen to smooth jazz, blues, a little rock, and the Hsu is magic with them all. Very musical! Used with Phase Linear 700 II amp, Classe Audio DR-5 preamp, Linn LP-12 turntable, Jolida JD-100 tube CD player, Meadowlark Audio Osprey speakers.

Similar Products Used:

Velodyne PDS10

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Dec 21, 2005]
johnrockets
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Strong output to ~25hz. Extension, headroom. Clean, powerful.

Weakness:

needs accommodating room / placement to really shine.

Excellent sub. Blends very well with two different systems I have used it on. Someone did mention room size in a review I read and I have to reiterate; I used this in a basement HT setup (corner loaded) for a long time and it absolutely rocked the house, with strong output to 25hz. In an apartment with woodfloors and higher ceilings it didn't seem as 'authoritive', although still definately felt its presence nicely. Keep this thing in a mid to smaller sized room with not so high ceilings and you will not be disappointed.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 17, 2005]
Matt B
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Musical and accurate Good build quality Blends well with Ascend speakers Clean bass down to 25 Hz Classic looks Reasonable price

Weakness:

None significant

The STF-2 is a great subwoofer. I decided to purchase a Hsu because they have a reputation for musical subs, and I spend about 95% of my listening time on two-channel stereo. After having the sub for several weeks, I believe that this reputation is warranted. The STF-2 is extremely musical, and it disappears completely once it’s properly calibrated: a grand piano sounds coherent and authoritative from the lowest A (27.5 Hz) to the highest C (4186 Hz). The STF-2 has very flat response and easily extends to the advertised 25 Hz. It’s also extremely powerful for a very reasonable price. The sub fills a 12W x 26L x 10H room with ease, even though I never raise the volume above the 10 o’clock position (that’s only 1/3 of the potential volume). I can only imagine how much bass it would produce if I cranked the volume. Hsu’s customer service is excellent. I’ve exchanged e-mails with Dr. Hsu himself, and he provided clear, useful suggestions on sub placement and appropriate crossover frequencies. Overall, I’m very pleased with my purchase and strongly recommend both Hsu and the STF-2.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-10 of 20  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com