M&K MX-200 Subwoofers
M&K MX-200 Subwoofers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 27, 2010]
dlivin
Audio Enthusiast
I've been around long enough to know M&K's history and reputation. When I found an MX200 on craigslist, I raced 20 miles to pick it up. That was 2 years ago and I'm still thrilled with the performance of this sub. Pipe organ music is outstanding, home theater performance is riveting, cd's come alive with low-end programming that few people get to hear (feel, rather). As mentioned, it requires responsibility to not offend the neighbors. |
[Mar 10, 2002]
Somthame
Casual Listener
Strength:
Accurate! dynamic! and quick!
Weakness:
you must be kidding??? I don''t know why there are not more reviews posted on this sub. It is an excellent product. For sure, it''s pricey but it will probably be the last sub that you''ll ever need to buy. Previously, I owned a M&K V-125. A pretty good sub! It worked well with music and was game with movies but it''s tendency to "bottom-out" and distort in the lower extremities of some movie material left me feeling somewhat deprived and displeased. A real bass work-out like "The Fast and the Furious" soundtrack on DVD would have been a trying task for the V-125 but the MX-200 waltzed through this difficult material with precision, style, power, and grace. I auditioned several subs (Polk, Mirage, DefTech, NHT, Velodyne, Paradigm)before my purchase. To these ears, the MX-200 was the best all-around performer. My better half nearly threw me out of the house when she found out that I spent over a grand for a sub but the MX-200 has easily won her favor (as I knew it would). This sub kicks butt!!! Similar Products Used: see above review |
[Sep 14, 1998]
andy baltra
an Audio Enthusiast
i have been living with this baby for 6 months now wow is this thing aewsome. had the v-125 at first nice sub but didn't go as low as i wanted so i upgraded to the mx-200.was considering the sunfire sub read an article on the sunfire and the rating of this sub was how much air was moved per square inch it was something like 280 cubic inches so i called m&k to see what the 200 was rated at the guy's at m&k had to measure it for me called back within 15 minutes with the results it was around 260 cubic inches. the average sub moves around 50-60 cubic inches so this thing just rocks right down to well below 20hz. |
[Oct 14, 1999]
Errol
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Kick-ass tight, fast BASS
Weakness:
if bass is turned up too much than it is not as tight After listening to this baby in a local music store, I looked for it online. I wasn't about to spend $1500 on a sub. I got this house-shaker for $1000 at JDS Productions. Some times I turn on the test tone on my AVR-3300 just to feel the house shake, and I do mean feel. You can feel this thing even more than you can hear it. Watching movies is pure heaven. And I never knew how important a good sub was in a system. I don't have to turn up the volume to get solid base anymore. My next speakers will be bookshelves. Who needs to spend all that money in a isolated tower when you get all the bass you can handle from a sub/sat combo. I mostly listen to classical and jazz at low volumes. I love this thing. Similar Products Used: none |
[Dec 16, 2001]
Mark
Audiophile
Strength:
Bass is tight, with good definition.
Weakness:
Price I had to return the first delivery because the sub did not work, adding to that problem, the wood was damaged Similar Products Used: none |
[Jan 13, 1999]
john mitsios
an Audio Enthusiast
I have now been using this subwoofer in a home theatre environment for some 12 months - I am still staggered at how much bass this box puts out and how low it growls.I also have an 18" JBL subwoofer in an 8 cu. ft. enclosure that I thought was awesome until I got the M&K - the M&K plays lower and louder( with both subs connected and playing simultaneously, I'm in bass heaven). |
[Apr 11, 2001]
Tony Knapcik
Casual Listener
Weakness:
NONE! When ever i have my friends come over we can pump this baby up! My neighboors across the street always call the cops because the bass shakes their houses. My friends have the JBL's but they arn't all what they are cracked up to be. Mine defenetly has a lot more deep bass and power.M&K IS THE BOMB!!! Similar Products Used: JBL, but this is way better |
[Apr 25, 1999]
John
an Audiophile
I have had my MX200 for several years now and have really loved it. I am a big fan of M&K product and have been a customer for over 20 years. I still have an original Volkswoofer that was recently rebuilt by M&K for a very reasonable $250. This included a new driver, power supply, output stages, and various other parts that didn't meet spec. The MX 200 is an improvement over the past subwoofers I have owned from them (Volkswoofer, 3B, MX70, MX125, and V75) but that old Volkswoofer still holds its own.The only problems that I have with the MX200 is a strong electrical smell eminating from the cabinet when really taxed. The heat sink doesn't seem to get very warm but upon internal inspection I found that the insulation was a little burned where it came in contact with wiring and electronics. This has happened with some organ recital music and VERY high volumes (115db peaks) and on various CD, DVD, and Lasedisk test disks, particularly the sine wave sweep variety. While this may be considered by some as abuse, the sub was not at its limits and still sounded quite good. Just be aware of the potential fire hazard. I have since pushed the insulation back and isolated it from the electronics. |
[Dec 09, 2000]
Wally Eggers
Audiophile
Strength:
Extremely deep and accurate bass.
Weakness:
None that I have found. I have had my MX-200 for almost three years; and this sub has impressed me from day one! In my opinion, it is a perfect compliment to the M&K satellites. Similar Products Used: Velodyne and Paradigm Subwoofers. (No comparison) |