Vandersteen 2Wq Subwoofers
Vandersteen 2Wq Subwoofers
USER REVIEWS
[Oct 11, 2015]
Neal in NJ
Audio Enthusiast
I've owned Vandersteen 2ce for about 10 years. Have been driven with old Acoustat TNT120 and more recently McCormack DNA-.5 I know very well what that system sounds like.
|
[Nov 17, 2006]
Discriminator
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Musical, quick, and accurate
Weakness:
Not optimized for home theater This subwoofer is most notable for its ability to blend seamlessly with the main speakers. I suppose it helps that my main speakers happen to be Vandersteen 2Ce Signatures but I think it'sprimarily the unusual crossed-over connnection from the main amp that helps meld the sound together so gracefully.
Similar Products Used: Onix Rocket UFW-10 |
[Jul 24, 2006]
Jimi J
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
excellent tone, and tempo
Weakness:
takes at least 100 hours to come alive, be patient. This is an excellent sub for music. Great tone and tempo. It does well with movies if you adjust your tone controls or the controls on the sub. I listen to music most and this is were it really exceeded my expectations.. It blends so well with my old Magnepan MG3a's that I almost forget its even there. I do not have a corner to put it in so the Q control is very useful. I can't wait to by a secound one for true stereo tone and tempo. I keep saying tone because this sub delivers it dead on. My old sub was good for movies and music but became tiring after long listining periods because the bass seemed...bloated? One 2wq does not play as loud as some subs, however the accuracy is unbeatable. Similar Products Used: Velodyne |
[Jul 27, 2004]
S Wallenberg
AudioPhile
Strength:
Accurate Fast and deep
Weakness:
Not much output below 23 Maybe not the best or ultimate sub available but extremely capable, accurate and quick. It's versatility shows as it handles music and movies with aplomb. Went to this from a SVS which musically was a big disappointment. Similar Products Used: SVS HSU |
[Aug 25, 2003]
jimmyjames8
AudioPhile
Strength:
Placement friendly and plenty of adjustability
Weakness:
Gain pot could be more precise and more finish options would be nice. $50 up charge for black? This is for the V2W home theater (?) Vandy sub. Same difference as the 2Wq but is set up for single rca, LFE sub out (input) from your pre/pro or AV receiver. I listened to a lot of subs in the $600 to $2000 range and bought this one without even listening to it. Had read a few magazine reviews and figured out what kind of sub I wanted and tried out some other designs in my listening room. While others claim it, this one will do it, that is work just about anywhere in the room. The slot loaded 3 active motor design with a big passive radiator up front thumps anywhere you put it. The corner out about a foot on 2 sides works well for me but I also tried it up front next to my center channel and that works just as well due to the adjustability of the sub itself and the bass management in my pre/pro (Outlaw 950). This sub is musical and thumps when you want it to on the movies. Try out Yes Fragile DVD-A on the Vandy, Cans and Brahms for lower register organ notes, it's scary low and powerful. Gunshots sound pretty authentic as well. Also check out any Marcus Miller disc on the Vandy. This sub will do what ever you want it to do, rock the house or shake the foundation and rattle the window panes. It's all in what you want it to do and how you set it up. The gain pot works a little too well. Could stand to be more tactile with less gain per increment. Zero works just fine for my set up. Proceed from there with caution. Warn the neighbors and contact local nuke plant to see if they are Vandersteen rated. Similar Products Used: NHT, PSB, Def Tech |
[Nov 23, 2002]
Stereonuts
AudioPhile
Strength:
Well defined tight and deep bass. Adjustable Q which works to compensate for in room response variations.
Weakness:
Proper setup takes a while. I purchased two Vandersteen 2WQ subwoofers at a total cost of around $2600. Compared to the single $3000 dollar REL Stadium 3 they are by far a better buy. I owned a REL stadium III for over one year before purchasing the Vandersteens. Both the Vandersteen and the REL hook up to your main amp in conjunction with your main speakers. Both of these subs retain the sonic signature of your amplifier but I could not get the REL to provide a smooth in room frequncy response and it would not fill in the in the room null at 40hz. This was solved with the Vandersteen and its adjustable Q control. The bass integration of both subwoofers are seemless with full range speaker that extend to below 40hz. The two Vandersteens have a much more solid bottom end with no overhang. On movie sountracks the Vandersteens also exceeded the REL. When the REL is driven near its max output wind noise is heard from its port which is audible from my listening position about 12 feet away. This does not happen with the Vandersteens sealed enclosure. The Vandersteens can provide more bottom end then almost anyone will ever need. My room is about 3,600 cubic feet and the bottom end scares me. You will have to adjust your processor to redirect the LFE to your main channels(easily done usually by just selecting "NO subwoofer" on most processors). This will actually provide the listener with much more coherant sound, and is also more compatible with the new SACD and DVD-Audio formats as the bass is derived from your main amp instead of your processor. system: power conditioner: Balanced Audio Technology BP-2.5 speakers: Vandersteen 2WQ (2) Dunlavy SC-IV Dunlavy SC-I/AV projector: Runco CP760W Stewart filmscreen processor: Anthem AVM-20 v2.0 amps: Anthem MCA-20 Anthem MCA-5 series II source: Elite DVL-91 CD/LD/DVD transport Onkyo DVC-610 CD/DVD 6 disc transport real time analyzer: Rane RA30 previously owned components: Lexicon MC-1/Citation 7.0/Sony TAE1000ES Classe CA-200;CAV-75/PassLabs X150 Acurus A150(4)/Sony TA-N55ES;TA-N220 Infinity RS8Kappas;ERS840(6);Modulus REL Stadium III Classe CDP-.3/Sony CDP-X333ES/Muse 5 Similar Products Used: Owned a REL Stadium III & Infinity Modulus. Auditioned many. |
[Sep 02, 2002]
IN2MUSIK
AudioPhile
Strength:
Build quality, SOUND , and Vandersteens cust. service is A1.
Weakness:
ZERO! Tight deep BASS!! Using with 3A sigs. and let me tell you its like listening to 1spkr with a buit in sub. Get 2 or forget it. Similar Products Used: REL |
[Dec 02, 1999]
Hayden
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Deep,tight bass.Easy to follow rhythm and pace,transparent blend with main speakers. Solid 20hz output and into teens.
Weakness:
None, if true,articulate bass reproduction is what you're after. Boom heads look eslewhere. I now have 2 of these units, but had one |
[Sep 12, 2000]
Paul Lindemann
Audiophile
Strength:
The Vandersteen Woofer is the fastest subwoofer I have ever heard. It has wonderful clarity and deep, true bass.
Weakness:
The hookup is a bit of a challenge - but Richard Vandersteen is accessible to assist, and he gives great advise if you can stand his lack of social skills (Read: This man is a genius, but intolerent). Amazing subwoofer! An acoustic bass SOUNDS acoustic. The difference between a plucked note and a bowed note is clearly defined. Similar Products Used: REL, PSB, Mirage. |
[Nov 28, 2000]
Eddie McLaughlan
Casual Listener
Strength:
Very fast.
Weakness:
None Very fast. Easily matches my Magnepan's, |