Polk Audio f/x500i Surround Speakers
Polk Audio f/x500i Surround Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Oct 02, 2003]
datarush
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
6.5" speakers allow you the option to set them as 'large' as they can handle lower frequencies. Bipole/Dipole switch. White looks cool on the wall, its presence is unmistakeable but not overwhelming
Weakness:
Quite heavy. You really need to mount to the framing, not the wallboard. It should come with a real wall bracket instead of a single screw. I've been jockeying speakers and speaker groups around for years and these are definitely the best surrounds I've ever used. Barely used by the previous owner, I set them in bipole mode and movies like Blue Crush and Saving Private Ryan are outstanding, while 5 channel music is clearly better in bipole. I still have a Frankenstein monster of a setup with 3 brands but they're all 6.5" drivers now and a Polk Csi40 center is a good match for these. Believe it or not these surrounds determined that Polk will be my home theater brand, for now at least, as I think Polk has done it best. I suspect the current model FXi50 are similar but I couldn't find them in white. These in white look good on the wall; I didn't want big 'ol black speakers stuck up there. I tried that it was bad decor, and many surround speakers have a footprint that is too wide for the wall I put them on. Even so, the sound is terrific and I don't know why you would have to pay more to get great sound. Similar Products Used: Phase Tech, NHT Super One, No Name |
[May 21, 2002]
dfiler
AudioPhile
Strength:
Clean crisp sound that matches the rest of my Polk home theater.
Weakness:
The wiring posts have been cripple so as not to accept bannana plugs. Also, with how close these things mount to the wall, using any sort of monster wiring plug is difficult. I ended up using the gold plated, braided, flex-tip variety on the end of origonal monster cable. This forces the wires to point up and out from the center of the speaker while still in the plane of the speaker's rear wall. The wires then curve around and meet before hanging straight down toward the floor. (makes a heart shape) When I learned that Polk was discontinuing my current line of speakers, I had to complete my setup before it was too late. Main: Polk RT55 Center: Polk CS400 Sub: Polk PSW150 Now all of the drivers and tweeters are perfectly matched. 8 6.5" drivers and 7 1" tweeters, all exactly the same. It makes a world of difference. Before, I had my rear channels turned down pretty low because they didn't blend well with the rest of the channels. Using them much at all seemed to create two sound stages instead of one. In my auditorium the rear speakers are closer to the listener so it tended to dominate. Not only do the speakers match the timbre of the main speakers, but they also hold there own quite nicely. I could actually switch off the center, left, and right and still have excelent sound. I have yet to decide if the dipole or bipole setting is best for the current configuration. The Bipole mode is definately more localized, but slightly more detailed. With the rears mounted pretty high on the walls, they sound better in the dispersed dipole surround field for theater sound. For music, I tend to run in a 5-channel stereo mode for which bipole operation seems to balance the sound between the front and rear. Its kind of ironic that now my RT55 mains are the cheapest speakers in the setup. Ahhhh... I love my rear channels ;-) |
[Mar 11, 2002]
mustang50
AudioPhile
Strength:
design, build quality, timbre matched with all polks.
Weakness:
none yet These speakers live up to the polk audio name. I love the bipole/dipole switch. I use them in dipole. They match seamlessly with all my other polks especially since they all use the 6 1/2 inch mid/woofers. the sound is clean and clear and they handle a brosd range of power. Capable of getting really loud and work great in 5ch stereo and dts mode on the onkyo. |
[Dec 11, 2000]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great match with the RT1000i's, good bass, great compromise to optimize both music and theater sound.
Weakness:
None Theater sound is absolutly awesome. Very clear from the highs right down to the lows. I have them set up as "Large" so I can make use of frequencies below 80Hz. They also sound great with music but if your preference is music listening there may be a better choice. The bottom line is they offer an outstanding value for those that love to feel like they are part of a movie as well as sitting in a concert hall listening to there favorite band. I feel you can optimize sound for either theater or music but comming up with a compromise is what I was looking for, and these speakers deliver. |
[Oct 13, 2000]
Lvis
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sound. great bass
Weakness:
huge size I originally had the polk 300i and was pleased with the sound, incredible detail from the rear. I got that from Circuit City for $398.98 for the pair. But i saw the 500i for the same price from an ebay user and i just had to upgrade. What really sold me to these speakers where the switchable dipole/bipole switch. They really match well with the B&W's 602/cc6 I have upfront. I have no complaints! Similar Products Used: polk 300 |
[Jul 27, 2000]
Ron Martinsen
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent sound quality, esp. when matched with the RT2000i's & CS400i. Dipole/Bipole switch, keyhole wall mount.
Weakness:
Not available in cherry finish like the RT2000i's. Too heavy to mount into sheetrock. These babies have some serious power, so don't be putting them up against some weak ass fronts or center because you'll be screwing up your surround sound system. Similar Products Used: Sonance T3500's |
[May 06, 2001]
Mike Klein
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clear, excellent sound. Switchable bipole/dipole. Dual Tri-laminate tweeter. Excellent for movie soundtracks as well as music. Clear instructions on optimal settings/placement given.
Weakness:
A bit on the heavy side for wall mounting, but I have seen it done. Other than that, not much comes to mind. These were an excellent deal for me given that I work at an electronics chain so that I can get dealer cost, $240 for the pair. But they are definitely worth it at 250/ea as well. I can't say a whole lot about these speakers except if you're looking for excellent surround performance that won't break the bank, these are an excellent choice. Yeah, the f/x1000's rock, but they're friggin' huge. So if you've got some good fronts, esp. if they're Polk's, by all means get them. Similar Products Used: None |
[Dec 07, 2001]
Mike
Casual Listener
Strength:
amazing sound!!,switchable bi-di pole.
Weakness:
a little big and heavy but thats all I can find! Purchased these a couple of months ago and I am very pleased with the sound of these speakers. Although they are a little big I did manage to mount them to the sheetrock with some heavy duty hollow wall anchors.I researched the bipole/dipole speakers for about 2 wks before deciding on this model with the help of a writing by Tomlinson Holman called "DIPOLAR confusion". I stumbled onto this on the internet one day a it helped a lot! In my research the collective ideas were that bipole/dipole speakers were only good for use in systems where someone was still using dolby pro-logic. I find that not true at all!! I took a week or so moving the spkrs. around the room from the sides to the rear and finally decided to place them about 3 ft. from the back wall and about 6.5 ft. off floor. This set-up seems to provide the widest sound stage and not too localized that a direct firing spkr. would. I also purchased the new Sony dvp-nc650v cd/dvd/sacd player. Talk about fantastic sound!! |
[Dec 14, 2001]
Lou Balch
Audiophile
Strength:
Excellent tonal balance. Good LF response w.o. sub. Quasi-dipole design.
Weakness:
None really, at this price. Excellent value and performance. I'm using 4 as a complete surround in a 7-channel system. The quasi-dipole design works better than a true dipole (like the RTfx's or LSf/x's)for DD/DTS/Multi-channel music in my small (13x16) room. Speakers are large, but are easy to mount with a single screw into a wall stud. Earlier report that the trilaminate tweeter has not changed since CS-300 is incorrect. Polk reformulated the mix of vapor deposited aluminum and stainless steel on the new "i" series which provides a smoother, less peaky response up top. Similar Products Used: Polk RTf/x, LSf/x, MS10i, MS20i. |
[Jun 26, 2001]
LAM NGUYEN
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
very good sound, perfect for DVD-audio, you can acutally hear bass sound come out from these speakers.
Weakness:
may be difficult to find the matching stands. I bought a pair of the polk f/x 500i to match my front and center channel speaker's tweeter. The f/x 500i produce an excellent sound overall, if you own a DVD-audio player, you may want to try these speakers. When I listened to the new Foreigner DVD-audio track number 3 (Starrider), wow what a different from the advanced resolution soud to normal stereo sound and these speakers did their job well. I have to go to a well known funiture store to buy the stands for these speakers (matching my funiture). Similar Products Used: polk RT f/x |