Proscan PS50700 Rear Projection
Proscan PS50700 Rear Projection
USER REVIEWS
[Aug 19, 2002]
Randy
Casual Listener
Strength:
NONE
Weakness:
Do yourself a favor and find another product Purchased 2-23-99 first repair 5-26-00 $228.33 2nd repair 3-16-02 $502.16 8-19-02 set won't work HV Transformer & output transistor bad on both repairs |
[Mar 02, 2002]
Lance
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great picture quality and viewing angle.
Weakness:
no component inputs, but hey I got it in 1998. I bought this TV new from Future Shop in Dec. 1998. The TV was originally priced at $1899.00. I compared the tv with Toshiba and Sony and found the Proscan to have the sharpest picture with the best color tones. So far I have had no problems and the TV is working great. |
[Sep 20, 2000]
john
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Outstanding Picture,PIP and TV guide feature
Weakness:
none The image qual. is very good. I think it is the best picture quality that you can achive without breaking the $2200 barrier. I bought this thing at Circuit City off of the floor (400 hrs of running time) for $1200 with the screen saver attached. I love it, now my Home theater is complete. I highly recommend the Proscan over the Toshiba and the hitachi models that are out there in this price range. The best part was the salesman delivered the TV to my house personally on his way home from work the same day free of charge. Now that is customer service. I also got the extended warr. plan. $250 / 4 years. I can wait to go home and listen to / watch a movie. Similar Products Used: Nothing worth mentioning |
[Nov 19, 1999]
Derek Bundick
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Lots of inputs, on screen TV guide feature, sharpest picture I've seen
Weakness:
no component inputs, speakers not impressive, but who uses those anyway? Im not sure why there are no reviews for this RPTV ? It's been out awhile and IMHO has the sharpest picture, especially for DVD, that I have seen in comparison to similar priced units by Sony, Hitachi etc. After a side by side comparison, there was no doubt this was the sharpest and best color balanced of all sets I looked at, except maybe the Mitsubishi, which was $500+ more than Proscan. I originally went in with the intentions of buying the Sony, but after adjusting picture controls of both sets the sony appeared to bright and the reds seemed off color and bled in to other dark colors where as the Proscan was not as bright but much sharper in appearance and no bleeding of bright colors. Two S-video and two composite inputs with two tuner pip are a plus, but lack of composite inputs keeps this set from getting 5 stars overall. It has performed flawless and never has lost its convergance settings since I plugged it in. By the way I bought this at circuit city for $ 1,700 six months ago and it they are still on sale and your in the market for a 50" do your self a favor and check this set out. Similar Products Used: sony |
[Jan 19, 2002]
M A C
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Nice picture when looking down, or straight at it. Preset picture settings, PIP.
Weakness:
NOT HD Ready. Just Purchased on the 17th of January 2002 as a closeout, openbox refurbished. To be honest, we were really looking to get a 36" tube, but at $769, $996.07 with tax, and Extended Service Plan, we would have spent the same. However for a 50" RPTV, this would definitely have to be a no brainer. I saw a couple of negative items that were addressed. I seem to be pretty pleased with this unit even though it is not HDTV ready. I will not complain as some ungrateful people out there would. I know my brother in-law and his wife were pretty impressed, since they just purchased a 36" Hitachi Ultravision less than 45 days ago, and now want our 50". Well that is flattering. If anything changes in 6 months or so, I will resubmit another review. If I remember a year from know, I will do another review and let everyone know more about it. Similar Products Used: Sanyo, Sony, Zenith Ultravision. |
[Dec 28, 2000]
Dennis Boschert
Strength:
Set works ok. But others work better for less money as we have since found out.
Weakness:
No support.. Corporate structure sucks and they are basically just DIFFICULT to get along with. (Synonym for DIFFICULT - Where do hemmoroids occur?) The unit operated just fine when we recieved it into the house. One exception was that thee Guide Plus programming feature did not work. However, we did not concern ourselves with this since we had digital cable which included this feature. Once digital cable was canceled, this became more important to us. After the initial problem was unable to be repaired by the local Proscan representative, contact was made to the manufacturer for the replacement of this unit. They, however, wanted to continue to replace various components in an effort to make the set functional. Thomson Electronics (the manufacturer) finallly admitted that this feature was not functional after having the unit in the shop for over two months. Similar Products Used: REPALACED WITH EXCELLENT TOSHIBA |
[Aug 11, 2000]
Gord
Casual Listener
Strength:
Great picture for cable TV, VHS tapes and outstanding for DVD
Weakness:
Cheesy speakers which I don't use. I was looking for a replacement for the Mitsubishi I've had Similar Products Used: Mitsubishi rear projection |
[Nov 16, 2000]
Tom Yau
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Exellent picture, adjustable to surrounding light conditions,inuitive remote
Weakness:
Had problem with coax connecter for cable but has been repaired and haven't had any problems since. When I went shopping for a big screen, I looked at Sony , Hitachi, and RCA. The Sony bigscreens had the worst picture. The Hitachi had 2 lines: one was less costly and of course their Ultravision line. RCA gave the most bang for the buck and not a bad picture. Then the Proscan 50" model caught my eye. It was less expensive than the Hitachi Ultravision series by around $500 and better than the 52" RCA. I was surprised how poorly Sony big screens were considering their excellent tube 43" model and their Wega XBR series. Plus I am a big Sony video product fan. The Hitachi Ultravsion had the best picture in the clarity and detail department but Hitachi video tone on all their products seem to have a haze and not enough black in the picture. The Proscan had superior warmth and coloration that is natural and pleasing to the eye. Setting up was a breeze because of the intuitive menus. The remote which has a light button to illuminate the buttons is quite good. Although after time the labels on the number buttons have faded. When I first purchased my DVD player, I was in a whole other world. I examined the edges on objects and it was completely free of ghosting or blurring, and the colors had extra depth. The comb filters seem to do the job. Although I don't recall wether it is an analog or digital comb filter or wether it is a 3 line comb filter or not. The results are the most important factor. Overall, in total it is just a cut above the rest. The automatic channel labels are a nice added feature. However, I do not use the the TV guide, so I cannot comment on that. Overall, a superb product. Similar Products Used: Hitachi, Sony, and RCA |
[Nov 17, 2000]
Jeff Mathis
Strength:
Picture quality, PIP and great remote.
Weakness:
PIP not easy to setup. Excellent Big Screen for the money. I was fortunate to be able to buy a floor model and save alot of money. Much better picture than Sony or Toshiba. Great PIP, sound is good for built in speakers. Super good for angles of view. Very easy to setup, able to ajust picture to room light. Similar Products Used: None. |