Panasonic CT-32G14 Standard Televisions
Panasonic CT-32G14 Standard Televisions
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 12, 1999]
Bob May
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good Price ($560.00) S-video, 2 audio/video inputs, nice stock stero sound, excellent remote
Weakness:
Only fair picture. Some geometry problems. Color & contrast need to be adjusted frequently depending on source (i.e. VCR, broadcast, video game) 'Superior' comb filter isn't so great. First off, I've always been a Panasonic fan. I really wanted to like this set. I went to Best Buy (mistake?) and compared several 32"sets (Toshiba, Sony, Panasonic, & Sanyo). You can't really trust the store comparison because of varying lighting and signal sources. Panasonic had the features and price, the redeeming quality of this otherwise average set. If I had a second chance, I'd get the $400.00 Sanyo and hold off spending more for a digital set. |
[Jan 07, 2001]
Nick S.
Audiophile
Strength:
I have a Panasonic CT-32G11, but it's almost identical except for it only has 1 RCA input
Weakness:
-Poor Poor POOR sound, but that's usual for a TV, and I have a Technics amp and a couple 500 watt Technics speakers hooked up to it so it doesn't really matter. This is overall a pretty good TV. It did die after only about 2 years and did take a fair amount of money to repair, but I doubt that happens with every TV and the quality of electronics today is generally much lower than 10 years ago. It does get a sharp picture, even with analog cable or a VCR. It gets a crystal clear picture with DVD, and it's not exactly the most expensive DVD player either, but it's pretty good. One annoying thing about it is the remote, it's sturdy but you have to push the buttons really hard to get them to work. Similar Products Used: 27 inch hitachi |
[Aug 22, 2000]
Steven
Audiophile
Strength:
Cheap. Straight picture on this one. Beats the hell out of the 27" for only $50 more.
Weakness:
For this price? Who cares? I care about high-fidelity sound, not high-fidelity video. GREAT for a $375 floor model.
Similar Products Used: Mostly all Panasonic. I've had a couple RCA small TVs, that were nothing to crow about. |
[Apr 06, 2000]
Mike Gesellschap
Strength:
Picture, 2 sets of inputs(1 on front) and S-Video input. Panasonic quality (Other Panasonic stuff I've got: 12 yr old VCR, 8 yr old VCR, 16 yr old TV)
Weakness:
Sound, but I haven't listened to audio through a TV in 6 years Purchased to replace 7 yr old 27" Panasonic that bit the dust. The picture is excellent and in my case the color/tint/brightness defaults were spot on for a change. I've always had these way off the defaults on the old set. I use this set as a monitor with a Dolby Pro Logic audid setup and DSS as source, so I don't care about sound or PIP. I paid $500 at Sears brand new in the box. I've read complaints about picture quality which could be related to the tuner/source. Using DSS I have good signal and the picture is wonderful. The corners to have a slight bend to them, but that's not really a problem. Similar Products Used: 27 in TV |
[Jun 17, 2000]
scott
Strength:
nice picture image good price
Weakness:
bad quality control/calibration of tv Buying this tv was one of the most frustrating consumer experiences I've ever had. I'ts got a great looking picture tube and was a good deal at the lower price range for 32" tv's.However, I ended up going through at least six tvs all with problems before I gave up on panasonics quality control. All of them except one had a slanted picture tube so that the bottom corners of the frame were cut off and/or out of focus. You could also notice a slant on letterboxed programming. The only one that was straight had color bleed problems. Perhaps the in house repair service could have fixed the problem, but after wasting so much of my time, Panasonic lost my business |