Panasonic CT-34WX50 Standard Televisions
Panasonic CT-34WX50 Standard Televisions
[Sep 04, 2001]
Michael
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Incredible Picture especially with DVDs; 2 sets of component inputs AND 3 other complete sets of video inputs.
Weakness:
no 720p Just got this set and appreciate all the comments below. As usual, my settings using Video Essentials are different from others mentioned. When adjusted, the picture is wonderful. DVDs really look spectacular. Similar Products Used: Looked at RCA 38" widescreen, Sony 34" , Tosh 34" and Phillips 34" |
[Jan 19, 2002]
Don Burns
Audiophile
Strength:
Best direct-view picture on the market today. Outstanding color and clarity, second to none. Many options for viewing progressive-scan DVD output, as well as standard TV images. Plenty of connectability options, such as five S-Video and component video jacks (including in the front of the set). Enormous array of options for fine-tuning and tweaking this set.
Weakness:
Expensive; you had best bring a fat wallet if you are looking in this price range. Standard TV set speakers are not on the same level as the picture quality, but since most people would use this with a home theatre setup, this is really a moot issue. Set is very heavy at nearly 200 pounds; best to have movers or guys with muscles haul this puppy around. Setup menus feature a dizzying array of options which the manual only partially explains, but if you know what you are doing, this feature would be a plus, not a minus. This review is for those of you out there who are not sure what to buy, as this was my dilemna for the last four months. Similar Products Used: 32" Sony Trinitron tube television (now about 4 years old and was relegated to the master bedroom when this one arrived). |
[Jan 19, 2002]
rak singh
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
picture quality, widescreen, great looks, good sound
Weakness:
price, difficult to locate in brick stores. This is a question rather than a review. Similar Products Used: toshiba 34", sony 32" xbr450 |
[Dec 11, 2001]
Alan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth picture - great line doubler and comb filter on analog cable make good cable signals look great. Great picture, great sound on progressive DVD component input. ( Also, don't need a splitter to watch two shows at once. )
Weakness:
Closed Caption (with sound on) only controlled by multi-button menu selection. XDS program information not decoded and displayable. Phenominal picture at US$2200 |
[Jan 24, 2002]
Sam
Audiophile
Just to let everyone know, Panasonic will have the CT-34WX52 out Summer 2002. There was a Press Release on the Panasonic Web Site last week, but it is no longer there. |
[Sep 25, 2001]
Chris
Strength:
Clear picture, lots of customizations, nice looking set.
Weakness:
No 720p, and there are still black bars for the 2.35:1 movies! This was actually my first set that I looked at.. and for some reason, I knew it was the one I was buying. I do plan on purchasing a new progressive scan dvd player (from pioneer - 434) and see the difference in quality. I mainly bought this for HD satellite and DVD movies.. but to my disappointment, there are still BLACK BARS on the top and bottom of the screen. In a way I feel ripped off, but I know that 16:9 will come in handy once I get satellite. |
[Sep 07, 2001]
Roger
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
WideScreen HDTV capable, FlatScreen, Clear Picture (Better than the Sony XBRs), Lots of input/output jacks, Auto Calibration & WideScreen Display Sizing if you play a WideScreen DVD or an HDTV signal.
Weakness:
Remote is kinda cheezy and I don't like the joystick functionality for adjusting volume and changing channels. I LOVE this TV! I compared and shopped for 2 weeks against the Sampo, Loewe, Sony XBR, Samsung, Toshiba Cinema, and Philips. My final decision came down to the Sampo, Samsung, and the Panasonic. The Sampo was awesome because it was able to do 480, 720, and 1080, but lacked front input jacks and had very few audio/video jacks in the rear. The Samsung produced a really awesome picture and the lowest price tag for an HDTV set (you can get it for $1800) but the Panasonic produced a slightly better picture and a better built-in line doubler. (You can tell the difference when you watch a Toy Story DVD). Plus, the Pansonic is a 34" and the Samsung is a 30". Similar Products Used: Sony XBRs, Sampo, Samsung 30" HDTV, Toshiba, Philips |
[Oct 04, 2001]
Mike Baker
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Panasonic Tau Series CT-32HX40
Weakness:
$$ While standard TV's have screens with aspect ratios of 4:3 (i.e., they're four units wide by three units high), the 34WX50, ready to display DTV broadcasts and anamorphic, "widescreen" DVD's, has a 16:9 aspect ratio, or ratio of screen width to height. Also, standard TV's are limited to about 480 interlaced lines of resolution, while the 34WX50 can handle the standard-definition digital television (SDTV) standard of 480p (progressive) and the high-definition digital television (HDTV) standard of 1080i (interlaced). |
[Jul 21, 2001]
David E. Edwards
Casual Listener
Strength:
Great set, except...
Weakness:
No 720 P I have been lusting for a HDTV set for some time. From the reviews here this set looked like it was going to be the one. Similar Products Used: Sony XBR |
[Jul 01, 2001]
Al
Audiophile
Strength:
Sharp,crisp,accurate film-like picture with progressive scan dvd. 1080i is like a 35mm photo. Two componet inputs.
Weakness:
VERY poor factory settings, no 720p support(not sure how important this is), bright silver faceplate,typical mediocre instruction manual. I spent four hours on two different occasions at Best Buy looking at all the hdtv sets. Projection and tube.(they did not have a Panasonic) I left the store with no clue as to what I was going to purchase. I went down the street to Bernie's and saw this set within the first few minutes of walking around. The quality of the picture(1080i) spoke to me and I knew right there that this was the set for me! This set needs a break-in for the best picture. Similar Products Used: At Bernie's the Toshiba set was adjacent to the Panasonic. The very top(2 inches) and bottom not in focus.Also the overall picture not as sharp as the Panasonic. |