Sony KV-36XBR250 Standard Televisions
Sony KV-36XBR250 Standard Televisions
[Jun 07, 2001]
Andy S
Audio Enthusiast
Don't bother to buy this product. I already spent |
[Feb 16, 2000]
Jerry Rutledge
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Best set available for NTSC signals.
Weakness:
Uneven brightness. I've had this set a month and I am still amazed at the picture quality evey time I turn it on. Most of my television viewing (60 - 70%)is NTSC cable broadcast and this is the best set available for NTSC signals. As someone mention earlier the colors are incredible. And it's the subtle colors that really amaze me. The color detail in darker shades and shadows gives the picture a 3D quality. I've seen that old chair (Fazier father's) on the "Frazier Show" many times but only since getting this set have I really noticed the texture, color scheme and duct tape patches. High quality signals like the "Late Show" or "Tonight Show" put you right in the audience. Similar Products Used: Panasonic 27 GAOO |
[Aug 08, 1999]
Al
an Audio Enthusiast
I just got this delivered yesterday and I must say that it looks every bit as good as it does in the store.The picture is amazing and I dont seem to find anything wrong with the tube. I'll post more about it if the tube goes on the blink, but for now. I couldnt be any happier. |
[Aug 06, 1999]
Michael
an Audio Enthusiast
I heard of all the problems with the 200, and was slightly nervous buying this one. Anyway, I've had it for a week, and its simply amazing. |
[Aug 11, 1999]
tadams
an Audio Enthusiast
Got my XBR250 yesterday and I must say I am impressed. The 16:9 mode picture is great. Very Sweet! The color seems to very good although I need to run the Video Essentials disc on it. The infared headphones are a nice bonus. |
[Aug 11, 1999]
Bim Paras
an Audio Enthusiast
Have tried this TV now for a good two weeks and all I have to say is that the picture is AMAZING! I have to admit that I took the plunge big time into the home theatre arena and went straight for the jugular so my comparisons are bit weighted since I didn't fool around with other TV sets. But from what I have seen from showrooms and shopping around, this has the best quality by far. My cable feed isn't the best but the TV still manages to make the picture top notch. |
[Aug 13, 1999]
Adam
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had mine a week and I love it. The picture is incredibly clear - I haven't seen any other tubes (well, maybe that $8000 Sony HD 'thang') which possess equivalent definition. The menus are laid out well and their navigation path is quite logical. Signal routing paths and control (via the menus) are also set up well. I haven't played with the IR headphones yet - too busy screwing around with my Sony 550D DVD player. The SRS Audio effect is kind of cool. BTW, I have a stronger background in audio than video, so you may want to take that into consideration. |
[Aug 13, 1999]
Steve
an Audiophile
I bought my set a week ago. The picture is spectacular. I ran Video Essentials and calibrated the picture. Anamorphic DVD's are incredible! It looks like Sony got it right with this model. There are no geometry problems! I love this TV... |
[Sep 06, 1999]
John
a Casual Listener
I guess this TV is really well-built yet the picture quality is not as good as the previous model, xbr200. You can see scan lines so clearly that your eyes get tired after a few hours. I am replacing mine with the true-flat screen Panasonic TV set from a japansese electronics importer. For those who are planning on buying this TV set, please go see it again and make sure if you really want one. |
[Sep 04, 1999]
Todd
an Audio Enthusiast
I've lived with this set for a month, and it is truly outstanding. I can rave on and on, but suffice to say, this is the best NTSC picture on the market today, bar none. |