Sony KV27S66 Standard Televisions
Sony KV27S66 Standard Televisions
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 02, 2001]
Murdoch
Strength:
flat screen, bright picture, nice looking cabinet.
Weakness:
unglued cabinet, one input.
|
[Dec 01, 1999]
eclipse
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent Picture, Inputs
|
[Nov 08, 2001]
Binh
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Vivid color, good sharpness w/ s-video, anamorphic squeeze & other tweaks using service menu, decent sound for a tv
Weakness:
Made in Mexico, picture is slightly tilted, slow channel surfing Picture is generally very good for a tv. However the drool factor doesn't come in until you use anamorphic squeeze on this sucker, when used in conjunction w/ dvdplayer via s-video w/ an anamorphic dvd. Its so sharp w/ the anamorphic squeeze, that it looks almost like an XBR WEGA or CRT screen. Similar Products Used: old Hitachi tv set, Magnavox, Panasonic Panaflat 27" |
[Jul 26, 1999]
Ian
an Audio Enthusiast
I wanted to buy a new 27" TV and since only Sony provides a 16:9 aspect ratiomode (via Sony's service menu, see http://members.accessus.net/~090/awh/sonyadj.html for details) it was going to |
[Dec 16, 1999]
Mike
Casual Listener
Strength:
Very good picture, great input/outputs, great remote.
Weakness:
Voices sound a little muffled. I chose this relatively expensive 27" "V" series set specifically because I wanted good audio, but now I do not use the set's speakers at all - I feed the audio to a receiver I bought at additional expense because the V series sets have the speakers on the side, which make voices sound muffled to me. I have the set in a entertainment center, like a lot of people do. I also have to use a cable box, so the fancy PIP and other functions are unused by me. If I had gotten the lowest-level "S" series set, I'd have the same picture with a simpler hook-up and save $150 + the cost of the receiver. I have seen sharper pictures on other sets, especially ProScan, but Sony has the best overall picture to me. The inputs/outputs, ergonomics, and the remote are all TOP NOTCH on the Sony sets, making them a pleasure to use. ProScan is too quirky for me. I can't figure how these obviously brilliant Sony engineers thought it a good idea to have side-firing speakers. The clarity of voice audio is paramount with television - I hate a lot of background noise - but I find the voices clearer from the back of the set than the front! My advice is that unless you really prefer a lot of sound, get an S series set with front-firing speakers (and audio out jacks if you prefer an external amp) and spend the money you saved on an external switching unit for the A/V gear you accumulate over the years. I give 4 stars overall because of audio only - 5 stars for EVERYTHING else, and only 3 stars for value because I think the 5 star value is in the S series sets. Sorry if I got a little windy here, but I hope I've helped a potential buyer! Similar Products Used: Any 27" Sony. |
[Dec 18, 2000]
mike bojorquez
Casual Listener
Strength:
Excellent picture, nice flat screen (flatter than about 90 percent of tv's out there). vibrant colors
Weakness:
none so far When I first started shopping for a new tv I knew that I wanted the best brand (Sony). So I chose this one because of its flat screen and awesome picture. If your going to buy a 27" tv go for this one......you won't be disappointed! Similar Products Used: n/a |
[Feb 18, 2001]
Mark
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Picture!!!
Weakness:
Annoying degause when it turns on, remote does not "flow" I think some of the reviews for this series of TV's were placed in the wrong catagory. This is for the 27S66, which is a fine television. I was deceiding between the 27S42, 27S66, and a 35" Toshiba open box. After reading all of the reports on this fine review board, I went with the 27S42 because it was on sale for $370.00 at BB. The first thing I did when I turned the TV on was take note of how loud the degausing was, and looked to see if the picture slanted. Mine didn't slant at all. The only problem I had was that the screen came "unglued" from the border, right above the Sony logo. After a couple of weeks, Best Buy had a sale for their Best Buy Credit Card holders (an extra 10% off any item). I took my 27S42 back and picked up a 27S66 on sale for $450.00. I got this one home, and the same part of the set was unglued, but that's a minor detail in my book. Similar Products Used: Old 20" Magnavox, Sony 27S42, 35" Toshiba |
[Jan 05, 2001]
Thomas Giddings
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
vivid color
Weakness:
distorted or tilted picture, bad customer service, mediocre sound, relatively expensive What attracted me to this set was its flat screen and vivid colors. When watching a DVD movie in widescreen format, however, I noticed that the picture appeared tilted or somehow distorted. The effect is also very noticeable when watching channels that run a banner across the bottom of the screen (Headline News, ESPN2, etc.). I have since traced the problem to the TV set. I have several acquaintances who also had the same problem with SONY TVs, one of whom had to bring his set back 2 or 3 times before finding one with a respectably level, undistorted picture. Similar Products Used: several, significantly better, JVC and RCA televisions |
[Aug 23, 2001]
Adam
Casual Listener
Strength:
Good picture, good inputs
Weakness:
tilted for letterbox The picture quality seems good. The sound is adequate, but for movies, I run it through speakers, so who really cares. Although I can deal with it, the picture is actually tilted a bit. With letterboxing like on the AMC channel, the right side is 3/16 of an inch higher than the left side. This is definitely noticeable, but I don't think it's worth it to return it becase I'll probably have the left side 3/16" higher than the right if I get a new model. Similar Products Used: none |