NAD T761 A/V Receivers
NAD T761 A/V Receivers
[Jun 21, 2001]
patrick cole
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
music quality
Weakness:
quality control issues I bought this unit on nad rep for building quality receivers,I have gone thru 2 of these units, both defective, the first receiver had problems with the surrond channels, the second unit not only had a problem with surround channels, while listening to a cd, I heard a loud pop, the unit shut down and sparks and smoke were coming out of receiver. I am done with nad after 2 receivers being defective I do not fell like going thru the hassle of getting another defective nad receiver, nad has gone down hill as far as building quality products Similar Products Used: previous nad owner |
[Dec 20, 2001]
Daniel
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great sound
Weakness:
Remote Great product. Similar Products Used: DVD-NadT550 |
[Jan 06, 2002]
clay
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
looks, sound......when it's working
Weakness:
was unable to receive digital input. remote. mediocre sound. I bought this unit in march; by june it was or wasn't picking up a digital signal. brought it back in Nov. and am going to pick it up next week, along with broken and hopefully repaired nad dvd player. I don't have much faith in the product after experiencing it and reading about it in these reviews. "customer service" sounds to me like some guy in a storage unit somewhere with a 12 year old answering machine. I'm not exited about picking up my nad's next week. Similar Products Used: nad dvd player |
[Oct 26, 2001]
Azim Ahmed
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Beautiful powerful clean sound
Weakness:
Unreliable I purcheased The NAD T761 in June of this year and upon hooking up, got only a black and white picture with the DVD. I called the dealer who suggested that my cable may be faulty, even though it was a brand new one. I tried another cable and got the same B & W picture. The OSD also disappeared after a while and could not get the surround, the subwoofer and the center channel to come on. I took the unit back to the dealer and as soon as he connected it, everything worked perfectly. I was so bad embarrased that I did not know how to set up the unit. Similar Products Used: None |
[Jan 14, 2002]
Geoff Bland
Audiophile
Strength:
clean soundstage, vibrant musicality, robust bass control, natural reproduction, punchy yet smooth. Great 2 in one amp that caters to music lovers who watch movies occasionally.
Weakness:
Gets quite hot! This is now my second unit due to faults in the first one. Not that I care too much, but to add to the others, the remote is pretty basic. Well it has been an interesting road followed with NAD, and the dealer Great Met Sound. I have to really give highest marks and gratitude to Great Met and Gary Parm who delt with me with utter patience and tremendous service. I bought the 761 back in july and 6 months later I started noticing an electronic hum coming through all of the speakers for the first5 -10 minutes of turning the thing on. After trying all the trouble shooting we could both think of I finally had it brought in to be serviced. After 2 weeks I got it back, hooked it up only to find the right channel was not responding at all. I began to worry. This is my third NAD amp I've owned. All others have had to have service but they were cheaper models and I can understand those falling out due to cheaper parts. But when spending this kind of money on a piece like this and expecting some quality it is not long before hopes are smashed when things go wrong. Nonetheless, Gary went to bat for me with NAD to have it replaced. NAD wouldn't budge. But Gary in his own benevolence displayed the utmost kindness and offered me the paid price minus $100 canadian for a trade in on another brand if I so wanted to. Toying with this opportunity I decided to give the ARcam avr 100 a whirl. It brought disappointment. Under powered and tinny compared to the NAD. It was nice at lower volumes but it you pushed it loud it would distort. So I ventured into looking at the much revered Arcam A85 integrated amp. I thought indeed I would be blown away having read all the reviews. I was not. Comparing it to my old NAD av 316 I found, for the music I listen to (Indie rock, punk, trip hop, Cure, etc..), I indeed liked the 316 more and i know I like the sound of the T761 better than the 316. The A85 was indeed nice and clean and musical but the vocals were very laid back, and the sound wasn't quite as "attacky" as I like. Great for jazz or classical, but the NAD was more rockn'roll. Perhaps the NAD pairs better with my NAD cd player...maybe i'm just too used to NAD sound. And I would be paying another 800 canadian for the ARcam and lose dts, dd. tuner, etc. So Gary, without question or hesitation simply gave me a brand new NAD t761, much to me delight. Now let me just say this. You pay for what you get. In the real world, no matter what things are made of things will always break. When you are dealing with wanting the best bang for your buck and sound quality, presentation, functionality, and music are your prime concerns, then the T761 is a sure winner. When I saw that the NAD sound was nicer than an Arcam integrated amp I realised just what kind of musicality I was getting for a dolby digital reciever for 2/3 of the price of the arcam. NAD sound definately compares nicely to higher level pieces. Just make sure you make a good repore with a good dealer to back up any issues you may have with NAD. And as Gary said to me, he has sold a couple hundered 761's and I was the only one who has expressed difficulties. No matter what there is always a lemon. But if you can definately check out NAD t761 and even better, go to Great Met Sound and talk to Garry. Similar Products Used: reviewed: marantz 5200, 6200, Arcam avr 100, Arcam A85, NAD T551, previously owned NAD AV 316 int. amp. |
[Dec 18, 2001]
Jim
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Looks, simplicity, sound
Weakness:
Quality control, remote, static pop and delay switching digital modes, lacking some basic features I know perhaps it isn't "fair" to post a second review, but after having lived with this unit a year now I feel I have to give a 2 star review to balance out to 3 & 3 (having given 4 in my previous review - the first one below). To be honest, I am not sure NAD deserves even the three star rating. This review is somewhat of an overall NAD review based on my expereinces with more than just the receiver. |
[Jan 25, 2002]
michael
Audiophile
Strength:
brillant sound quality, depth, absolute power for money
Weakness:
the remote i serched around for probably a year before i settled on the t761. it has more than enough inputs and outputs to satisfy any of the disconcerned buyer. any sony, yamaha or of something similar quality you have to spend in the order of $4000 aus to get anything close to this amp, as for morance the other players in the nad quality range you still have to about another five hundred dollars. Similar Products Used: yamaha, nad dolby surround, techniques |
[Jan 12, 2002]
Brian Ziegler
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound and Looks
Weakness:
The Stupid pop when you go into DTS mode I've had this receiver for over 5 months now and I have to admit that I am quite happy with it. The sound is outstanding especially in the ears mode. I like the minimalist approach to the design and function of the unit. Similar Products Used: Yahama, |
[Jan 02, 2002]
Greg Chait
Audiophile
Weakness:
Nad's insufferable attitude towards their customers I received the following e-mail from a Paul Milder, who purports to speak for NAD, regarding my request for information about how to return this piece of junk receiver that I unfortunately purchased: |
[Dec 31, 2001]
Greg Chait
Audiophile
Weakness:
Abysmal quality After being in light service for 2.5 months, the NAD T761 broke. It will power up, but the front panel display will not come on and it emits a loud screech through my speakers. No word yet on whether the dealer will take this back. I should have known, having read all of the prior reviews, that this was a piece of junk. |