NAD T761 A/V Receivers
NAD T761 A/V Receivers
[Sep 30, 2001]
Robin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean look, smooth sound, simple layout for control and hookup.
Weakness:
Upgraded HTR-1 remote doesn't have all functions, no standby button on panel, limited in assigning audio/video inputs, low power. OH YEAH -- Mine was BROKEN -- some electronic problem. I was so excited to get my NAD receiver. I bought the highest powered A/V receiver in it's ballpark -- NAD has limited power offerings. First thing I noticed is what I heard as the lack of power in this unit. I liked the smoothness of the amp(s), but there wasn't much power being delivered to my Mission 782's (mains) rated at 89 Db sensitivity. I would have kept the unit, but I already had to get a remote upgrade. I'm sick of getting fixes to this unit that should have better quality. Similar Products Used: N/A |
[Sep 24, 2001]
Steve
Audiophile
Strength:
2-channel stereo is fantastic, DD & DTS aren't too shabby either.
Weakness:
I agree with others that the remote rates high on the cheesiness scale. My tales of woe with the "Similar Products Used" can all be read about in reviews of those items except for the T751. I liked it, but didn't care for the inflexible speaker presets. Not a problem with the T761 at all! Similar Products Used: HK AVR300 & AVR310, and NAD T751 |
[Aug 18, 2001]
Mr Freeze
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
quality of product and distributor After buying in March the unit finally succumed to the centre and rear surround channel " dissappearing " |
[Jun 25, 2001]
Roger
Audiophile
Strength:
Music First, Perfect Sound, Detailed Home Theater, Ease of use, Quality, Quality, Quality.....
Weakness:
None This is the most outstanding surround sound receiver I have ever heard. I listen to all styles of music and watch all styles of movies. I found the comments from previous buyers about the receiver not very suited to Rock music strange. I found it most satisfying and not flat at all. My old stereo receiver (Nakamichi SR-3A) has a very clean sound as well with its Stasis amplification. The Impedance Sensing Circuitry of the NAD made the BP-8 fronts sound more efficient and alive than the classic Nak. I blasted away with Floyd, Zeppelin, U2, etc., and it was audio Nirvana.!!!! Similar Products Used: Nakamichi SR-3A, tested Denon 3801, HK AR-510, Onkyo 575 |
[Jun 21, 2001]
james
Audio Enthusiast
I bought this unit two weeks ago and I'm having trouble adjusting to the sound. By that I mean my old stereo receiver was a 35 watt Luxman that was a more aggresive, forward sounding unit that sounded fantastic with my Klipsch KLF 20's, a more live sound than with the 761. The 761 is a more nuetral, laid back sound and I'm not sure I will be able to adjust to it. If after one month I still feel the sound does not suit me I will have to take it back. It's not that it sounds bad but I'm more use to the sound with my Luxman and if they sold a A/V receiver I would buy it. |
[May 04, 2001]
Joel
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Simple design, easy to use and set-up, excellent sound, standared remote works well, beautiful uncluttered front panel
Weakness:
Rear panel could have a better lay out, non-standard speaker post distance, wish it was easier to track down new remote The T761 is an excellent reciever. Most NAD purchasers complain about the stock remote - but for the reciever and other NAD products it works quite well. Remote codes seem difficult to learn to other remotes however. I tried the Marantz Mk2000 and 5000i with less than glowing results. I look forward to testing out the new remote. The speaker posts are a little crowded but not a real big deal. The B&K has a much more spread out rear panel which is nice but the T761 is just fine. Similar Products Used: NAD T751, Kenwood A/V, Pioneer 9000, Onkyo 575x, Marantz 5000SRV |
[May 03, 2001]
Mr Freeze
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sound, straight forward design - no unwanted DSP settings etc. , internal cooling fan
Weakness:
Remote, Static pop when changing sound mode, unable to assign name to inputs. After replacing my cheap and nasty RCA home theatre in box ( bought after selling my NAD / Mission set in an act of stupidity ) with the NAD T761, I knew I had made the right choice. Similar Products Used: NAD Pre/ Power combo |
[Feb 17, 2001]
Brian
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Build quality, easy to setup & use, excellent sound -especially in 2 channel stereo
Weakness:
Remote control, noticable delay switching A/V & digital modes/sources When I first started my month long search for a new A/V receiver, I hadn't even considered the NAD. On weekends I travelled from dealer to dealer listening for hours at a time to all the above mentioned units, but nothing really got me excited. Finally, I stopped in at a NAD dealer who also carries Sony ES, Marantz & Pioneer Elite. After listening to the NAD T761 in their showroom (with Boston Acoustics speakers), I knew this was the one. To seal the deal, the dealer offered to let me take it home and try it out. After a week with it at home, I bought it and haven't regretted it for a minute. Similar Products Used: Pioneer VSX-D1S (owned) auditioned Denon 1801/2801, Sony 333ES, Pioneer Elite (various), Marantz 5000/7000, Yamaha 800/1000, Onkyo 575 |
[Feb 04, 2001]
Keith
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound, strenght of amplifier
Weakness:
Remote, Expensive Best stereo sound I could find in it's price range. No high fequency stress problems. Simple to operate. Good reveiver for someone who cares more about stereo sound than home theater performance. I can't rate home theater performance because it's brand new to me. That and I don't care. Home theater is for them, stereo is for me. This thing sounds nasty straight out of the box. Let it run for a couple of days and it gets better fast. Marantz SR7000 was no competition. SR8000 was very close but $400 more. That and the 8000 was too dependant on a very poweful and expensive remote control. This is worth a listen! Make sure the demo is broken in or you will be dissapointed. I don't understand the one star rating below. In it's price range we didn't hear anything that came close. This reveiw is based on build and two-channel sound quality. Similar Products Used: Marantz SR7000 & 8000 |
[Feb 03, 2001]
James Wesley
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
High current AMPs, music first, looks & NAD's KISS approach A/V
Weakness:
Current shipping models have older T760 remote The unit has plenty of power, setup is relatively simple. I found the manual adequate. The T760 remote is inadequate. But NAD informed me that NAD dealers will receive the new learning remote sometime in April 2001. Dealers will notify customers for replacements. Owners can keep the T760 remote as well. Similar Products Used: Sony, Technics |