Sony STR-DE525 A/V Receivers
Sony STR-DE525 A/V Receivers
[Jan 05, 1999]
Kipp McMichael
an Audio Enthusiast
My review is sorta lacking cause I only used this amp for 2 days. The salesman claimed it could push four CV floor speakers (4 ohm resistance). Alas, but it could not - at least not for more than 2 days. On day number 2, the amp switched to protector mode. So long DE525...While it did work, I was pleased with the overall sound. The surround modes also did a nice job but you can't power A+B in surround so I had to used smaller speakers for the other channels. A good amp - but not one to be used with 4 ohm speakers unless maybe you only push two of them at a time. |
[Apr 30, 1999]
James Faulke
an Audiophile
Last year I purchased this reciever, and for the price it was great. My old reciever gave off a lot of background static, but when I hooked up this one my static problem was completely gone. Sony makes very good products for the price. In the future I'm hoping I can move up to their top of the line ES series which will set me back a few dollars! |
[May 07, 1999]
Andrew
a Casual Listener
Before I bought this Sony STR-DE525 I had a 1981 JVC 50 Watt per channel reciever. It worked pretty well until the left cheannel went out a couple weeks ago. I think that the Sony is great, especially compared to what I had before it. I love all the DSP modes and it has plenty of power and bass to make my Technics SB-CR77 speakers sound great. Overall the only complaint I have is that the remote flip up cover is kinda chessy but oh well, at least the reciever does a great job. I got it for $250 at circuit city, and it is a terrific buy for that price if you are looking for a decent reciever with lots of power and for a cheap price. |
[Jun 14, 1999]
Frank
a Casual Listener
There is no reason to buy this overpriced receiver when you can get an better receiver for the same price. Being just another naive customer, I bought one of these jackson's for one day, but I returned it because CD's sounded like records, and ended up getting an Onkyo for the same price instead. It says its supposed to be 100 watts by 5 but all the 'less powered' Yamahas, Onkyos, and HKs I listened too blew it away. Sony also tends to add all these useless soundfields that you'll never use anyway. I would recommend against buying a sony receiver, and if you don't believe me, just go to the store and compare them to other brands. |
[Jun 24, 1999]
Olen Ronning
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought the STR-DE525 on a clearance sale at Future Shop for $250 about 6 months ago (back when the receiver was going for $300+). My main reason for purchasing that particular model was because of all the features and power it offered for the very low price. I was VERY pleased witht the sound quality running it on my Pioneer towers (which aren't really known for sound "quality") and Bose center channel and (no-name) sorrounds. Before I had a Pioneer 110x4 Pro-Logic amp (which blew out)and the Sony kicked its butt up and down with features and sound quality/clarity. The only thing the Sony lacks is a good Bassboost. It works well and is very clean, but if you don't have a sub, it's not enough (The pioneer had a stronger bassboost, albeit a little muddier). I'm planning on buying a sub which should hopefully solve my only complaint with this excellent receiver (especially for the price). I don't mind the remote, although it is a little bit cheesy. I haven't tested the 5.1 Dolby digital yet (because I don't have a DVD drive) so i don't know how well that works. Overall, I give this receiver a 4.5 for it's overall quality, power, and excellent price. |
[Jul 09, 1999]
James
an Audiophile
Hey, I got this baby for $159.00 as an open box product atBest Buys. |
[Aug 03, 1999]
David Mews
an Audio Enthusiast
Bought this rather large amp for $475 australian which was very cheap at the time. Did its job well with my old set of speakers (set of Pioneer PD426 floor standers). |
[Aug 13, 1999]
Daniel
an Audio Enthusiast
Overall i think this amp/receiver isn`t too bad. When powering my diy home speaker setup (consists of a pair of large column mains, a pair of di-polar surround towers and 2 active subs) the 525 performs rather well, with more than enough output. My only nitpics are the remote with its cheesy fliptop and the far to a coarse volume control. Oh i also blew the amps left channel output within the first 2 weeks, but since it was fixed i`ve had no other problems (and that was over a year ago) |
[Sep 17, 1999]
JimV
a Casual Listener
Got this receiver from a Sony outlet store for $199. Have had it for about 6 months now. I have it hooked to a Pioneer CD player, circa-1981 Technics speakers, and a KLH subwoofer. Definitely has enough power to get very loud. When playing music, it fares pretty well - at least, it has managed to bring out details I've never heard before, on CDs I've spun a hundred times before. I have yet to try it for home theatre yet; must invest in 3 more speakers first. And the remote: why can't you turn the receiver ON with the remote?!Given what I paid for it, and given too that I am not a raving audiophile, I'll give this receiver 4 "speakers". |
[Sep 09, 2000]
Lincoln
Strength:
Power, features, powerful remote, good looks.
Weakness:
volume control on remote isn't precise as I would like. I have used this reciever with two Pioneer 3-way 16 inch speakers, and it sounded great, despite the cheap speakers. I have also used it to power a 10 inch KLH powered sub, which also sounded excellent, and really suprised me, considering it was a KLH, and vibrated the walls of half of my 3000 sq. foot house, and was audible from the street. After the KLH burnt out on another reciever, I returned it and bought an Infinity 12 inch sub, and that sounded TERRIBLE. I had a lot more respect for Infinity before i bought and returned the sub two days later. |