Yamaha RX-V592 A/V Receivers
Yamaha RX-V592 A/V Receivers
[Nov 12, 1999]
Keith
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Strengths are simple, good power, good stereo sound, good
Weakness:
None that are serious although I think I agree with another reviewer that the center channel is lacking a little in power (or clarity). I have a tonally matched front with PSB 800i's for mains and the PSB 200C as my center and I still need to jack-up my center levels to get good sound (this makes it hard to properly adjust my system for optimal surround sound. Love my little unit but it's time to upgrade. I'm looking at the RX-V995 because it has more power, more inputs and of course, more bells and whistles. When shopping for the 592 and the 995, I compared all sorts of competitors (Sony, JVC, HK, Marantz, Denon etc) and in both cases, I've always found the Yamaha to be the better product for the money. In another post, someone said that they wanted a 'higher-end' unit like a Sony (ha!) or an HK and all I can tell you is that when you compare power supply (Discrete power, not 'Sony' power!), distortion levels, quality of the units surround sound, build quality, etc., you will always come back to a Yamaha unit as giving the best 'bang for the buck' (at least for models under $1,000). On paper and in the listening room, I have yet to find a unit to compare with Yamaha. Similar Products Used: Yamaha RX-V690 |
[Feb 13, 2000]
Darren Woo
Casual Listener
Strength:
- Whole bunch of inputs on the rear panel (read: many options)
Weakness:
- The remote: Odd shape, way too may options for me I've had this unit for a little over two years now and it has performed almost flawlessly for that time. I've always had Yamaha components all of my life, so I'm very attached to the products the company releases (my 5 CD player is also a Yamaha - wanted a Yamaha DVD player, but it was too expensive, bought Hitachi instead). What I've noticed about this unit is that the right front channel is a little bit louder than the left (compensated by adjusting the balance knob). Note: It wasn't the speakers; checked that. Some might not find this a problem, but I find it somewhat disconcerting. I don't know if this is common with other receivers, but you would think that they would get it correct at the factory. I'd only noticed this AFTER the warranty had expired. I don't know if it was this way from the first day that I bought the unit or if something ‘snapped’ internally later to give this problem, slight as it may seem. If anyone else has this receiver and this same problem, drop me an email. If it wasn't for the left/right channel imbalance I would give this unit 5 stars, but I do expect this receiver to last me a lifetime. BTW: I paid $600 CDN for the unit in January 1998. |
[Feb 23, 1999]
andrew
an Audio Enthusiast
This reciever is great value for the money...one of the few digital ready receivers to have a complete set of preouts. I have only one beef with this machine and that is the power to the rear speakers...they would do fine in prologic with an 8 ohm load, but are working hard when in digital mode (full stereo) with 35 watts max. The tuner is excellant hooked into cable. I run dual centre channels at 4ohm no problem. All my other speakers are pre-out to power blocks and am using heco 4 ohm speakers that are simply wow...full rich sound with a slightly lean tight bass..made in germany. The digital sound feilds are fun, but i prefer either cd or dvd. Am also using technics ac3 processor and hitachi dvd. This receiver gets high marks for features and has ok power on its own except the rears. The only other gripe is the remote (yuck). I hope yamaha does something about the remote...too big and cheesy build quality. But yamaha made up for it by giving a full set of pre-outs for future expansion, something usually only found on $1,000.00 plus units. |
[Feb 17, 1999]
Matt
an Audio Enthusiast
6 months ago I would have given this receiver a much more positive review as it was a huge improvement over the 1981 vintage Technics 30wpc reciever it replaced. However, after owning the RX-V592 for 13 months and never pushing it, the output was shot. I don't know the technical specs of what went wrong, only that it would no do its job of playing music. I checked with the technician and he said, "this is real common, they just don't build these things that well anymore." It will be fixed under warranty, but I can't help but feel that this should not happen. Remember that Technics 1981 cheapo I mentioned? Never has had a proble in its life. If you buy this receiver - get the extended warranty. |
[May 19, 1999]
john tucker
an Audiophile
i think that the 592 is great and it's a good value for the price.I got mine for under 300.00 , the only thing that you need to be awareof is |
[Aug 30, 1998]
Ran Bar-levi
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently bought this reciever and i could'nt get a better deal for its price range it a very good home cinema ampthe 6 d.s.p channel sound realistic its allready Dolby Digital ready if you add the DDP1-2 Decoder |
[Aug 30, 1998]
Anil M. Paranjape
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought this for $370 about 9 months ago (retail). I am *VERY* happy withit. It's the heart of my home theater/music system which is a mishmash of |
[Mar 28, 1999]
Rob
an Audio Enthusiast
Just bought th RX-V592 for $269! I thought it was such a great price I had to take it. However, I'm not very impressed with the sound...mids are too loud, and the bass boost button makes a barely perceptible change in the bass. I haven't used it in surround yet, but as 2 channel stereo, it kinda bites. It seems built like a tank...it weighs a ton! Believe it or not, I tried the Optimus stav 3690 for $299 for comparison. In stereo, the sound is very clean, great bass, and the bass boost makes a MAJOR difference at low listening leves (which is all I can do in my apartment anyway). The only complaint about it (besides being a RAdio SHack product) is that the volume knob has a cheap feel to it...doesn't glide like it should...seems like there;s a kink in it. Would really like to try the Denon AVR 2400 before I keep the Optimus. Maybe I just got one of the bad yamahas...I was really looking forward to a yamaha receiver. |
[Sep 29, 1997]
Sam
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased a RX-V590 receiver, however I did not feel the product was up to expectations. It was lacking in the bass area. I bought the comparable Technics receiver. While the bass was much more significant, the mid range seemed a little muddy and lacked definition. Returning the Technics, I brought home a RX-V592. Bingo! The highs are crisp and clear. Voices, male and female, sound excellent. And, there is the bass is improved over the 590. The loudness switch is a welcomed addition. The 592 appears to be a significant upgrade in comparrison to the 590. It has an overall clarity that is superior to most other receivers in this price range. |
[Jun 12, 2000]
mark miller
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
power.ease of use.build like a rock.power again
Weakness:
bass,extion is useless. got this receiver open box for 200.00,if your looking for Similar Products Used: h-k |