Yamaha RX-V595a A/V Receivers
Yamaha RX-V595a A/V Receivers
[Nov 14, 1999]
Walt
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent sound, plenty of power. SVideo. Rated for 4 ohm speakers. Phono input.
Weakness:
Remote stinks. Can't route S-Video ins to composite outs and vice versa. Bass filter fixed @ 90 Hz. Spring clips for center & surround channels. This receiver is GREAT! Clean, excellent sound. Runs very cool to the touch, with no cooling fan. |
[Jun 26, 2001]
Mike
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound and build quality; great with all types of music and movies; runs cool no matter how hard driven.
Weakness:
push terminals for center/surround speakers; remote could be better, but it's acceptable. I've been an enthusiast for over 25 years and this receiver is probably the best I've ever owned. I paid $400 at the time it was current, which is truly a bargain in such a crowded price point, but if you can find one now at a reasonable discount it should be given serious consideration. I guess what I like best about the unit is that every time I turn it on I know it'll give me what Similar Products Used: Pioneer, Technics, Sony ES, Adcom |
[Dec 28, 2001]
Andrew Eckstein
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean, powerful sound.
Weakness:
Bass response, could use old fashioned loudness button when listening to FM stations. I purchased this unit in Dec 1999 to replace my old Marantz receiver, and upgrade to home theater. I wanted both Dolby Digital and DTS, and after comparing many units in this price range, the Yamaha stood out. Similar Products Used: Marantz 2220 model (20 years old) |
[Jan 25, 2002]
Leonard Chiu
Casual Listener
Strength:
Clean,detail sound and punchy bass.Easy setup although no onscreen display.
Weakness:
No banana plug on center & surround. I didn't realised how good this receiver is until I brought home a Marantz SR5200 for upgrade for it's 6.1 & PL2 at a very tempting price. The Marantz being 15W advantage on all channels was a disappointment.On 2 channel stereo it didn't have the tight mids and the punchy bass the Yam Had. Moreover, the Marantz burnt out in smokes only after 20 minutes of play. I returned the unit and keep my Yam for now. I'll wait for Yamaha to come out with an entry level PL2 receiver like the onkyo 494. The Rxv1200 is still a bit expensive. Similar Products Used: Kenwood,Teac & Techics |
[Jan 22, 2002]
Monkey_Man
Audiophile
Strength:
Smoothness, high end, bass control, non-digital volume control, phono input, resolution of fine detail, nice power output. Glow in the dark buttons on the remote!
Weakness:
No banana jacks for surround speakers, shrill when pushed (extremely) hard, numbers wearing off the remote buttons, that's about it. A great reciever overall, all the great traits, some of those that made it exceptionally better than other A/V recievers I've heard (even at 3X the price) were it's ability to retrieve low-level detail. I like the volume control, in that it's not digital like you see on most of the others. The 70 watts that it's rated into each channel is VERY conservative. It powers my B&W602 S2 speakers just fine. Similar Products Used: Harman Kardon AVR7000, AVR520, Onkyo TXDS898, TXDS696, McIntosh monoblocks |
[Nov 09, 2001]
Aad Fokker
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good, precise sound in Stereo and DD
Weakness:
Too many hall/movie and other 'effects' that I never use. Yamaha already was main competitor for my old Luxman some 25 years ago. Similar Products Used: Luxman 25 yr.old 1040 stereo reciever, amnnalogue tunng. no remote |
[Oct 04, 2001]
Gregor
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price, DSP modes, Dolby Ditigal and DTS
Weakness:
Spring connectors for rear and center channel speakers, needs more digital inputs for audio I was looking for a entry to mid level reciever which had Dolby digital and DTS decoding ability. I had listened to a friend's Yamaha RX-V 2090 and thought it sounded pretty nice so I decided to go with a Yamaha. The DSP modes are nice - although some are a bit much (the concert hall mode has too much echo). The sound is pretty bright and very clear - I haven't experienced any distortion yet (I also haven't tried turning it up more than halfway because it gets too loud). Overall I've been very pleased with the reciever. I only wish it had more digital inputs for audio sources. The only problem I've experienced is that every now and then it will shut off for no apparent reason. I don't know if it's a short somewhere inside the amp - or if it's clipping for some reason. |
[Sep 06, 1999]
linn
an Audio Enthusiast
Just got this yamaha today to replace a old sony pro logic receiver and man what a difference! i can hear every little detail that i never even heard when watching dvd. simply the best receiver for the money! |
[Aug 28, 1999]
K.P.
an Audio Enthusiast
Just upgraded from my pro-logic receiver today. Man! what a huge difference. Love the sound that this yamaha delivers. AC3 is miles ahead of pro-logic. Have not tested out the DTS yet....can't wait. Rushing out tomorrow to get "Tina Turner - Live in Amsterdam" in dts, heard the DVD rocks. OK, on to the receiver itself.Cost me US $465 here in Singapore. All the Yamaha RX-V series look alike and this one is no exception. Only 3 things that I dont really like about it: |
[Sep 11, 1999]
Helluva Engineer
an Audio Enthusiast
I agree with previous posters that the Yamaha RX-V595a is a fine receiver. I own one with a different label. |