Pro-Ject 6.1 TurnTables

Pro-Ject 6.1 TurnTables 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 11  
[Feb 26, 2006]
aroostookme
Audio Enthusiast

I submitted a full review of this table and it is here. I wanted to add a few things I have discovered in the last month that may help you in choosing the Pro-ject 6.1. First, you can get a new 6.1 dustcover from Needle Doctor for $40. Just a great thing to know. I replaced mine and my table looks like a million. Second, I have changed my power cord to a grounded cord. I can use my Grado Platinum cartridge with no hum. Third, the inner plinth of this table is a second platform for balancing and leveling the table. I had not recognized that initially. the process is to put the upper leveling screw in midway. Level the table with the bottom leveler feet (use that gorgeous little Pro-Ject wooden level that comes with the deck), and then level the platter (isolated) with the three surface screws. What a really nice piece of equipment and engineering. Fourth, the gold output RCAs allows you to change the interconnects to your personal faves. After switching out several brands I would pass on that Kimber's KCAGs are fantastic with either the Grado Platinum or Sumiko's Blue Point Special. This table sounds as good as any other table I have heard. If you can get one grab it. Because it looks terrific with the new dustcover, and sounds terrific with a new power cord.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 10, 2006]
aroostookme
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Solid table. Great platter system and I find the isolation system on this table so good I got rid of my turntable isolation platform. I am using the same two cartridges on this table (Shure V15 and a Sumiko Blue Point) as I use on my Music Hall MM-7 and my Rega P-3. Only switching out the tables. The P-3 has a great Grace tonearm but does not out play this table. The MM-7 has a tonearm much like the Pro-ject arm. The MM-7 is significantly quieter than either of the other two. Buy this table anytime it is under $400. It has gold RCA out plugs for easy adding of your favorite cables. An incredible resonant-free chasis system, a really nice arm no one can seriously fault in the real world, built in spirit levels, fantastic three-part platter system. And it is beautiful to look at. People look at it and say "How much does something like that cost?" Gorgeous.

Weakness:

That darn dust cover thing. Who thought this approach was a good idea? I suggest serious owners have a custom base built that closes the sides and includes some sort of box-in ability to completely close this table. It's a gem, but it get dusty due to poor cover engineering. Imagine this level of a machine -- it's terrific -- and they fall down on the dust cover.

A step above. The missing link between bare essential tables like the low end Rega and Music Halls and the high end stuff that costs as much as a home. This is a great value.

Similar Products Used:

Linn LP12, Rega P-3, and Music Hall MM-7.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 30, 2000]
Thomas
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

lots of value for money

Weakness:

for that price, none

After listening for over 8 years to CD only, I decided to get a turntable again. Since then I bought more than 300 LPs and just about 30 CDs. Do I have to say more? I use the Project with a Grado Platinum Wood Pickup and it beats my Linn Mimik CD-Player (which I consider preety good) hands down. Next upgrade will be the 6.9 tonearm.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 29, 2000]
Paul
Audiophile

Strength:

Functional, pragmatic design and details. This baby screams value!

Weakness:

Dust cover does not envelop the entire unit; leaves gap for dust to waft into.

Why I chose the Pro-ject 6.1:

1. Value
2. value
3. a really great value

Who the Pro-ject 6.1 might have been made for:

1. Post-digital refugees who do not make six digit incomes
2. Savvy buyers who like to stretch a buck a mile.
3. Those lemmings who have been lulled into a Rega-trance by uninformed and disinterested audio critics.

Three things that happened within fifteen minutes of de-boxing and initial set-up of said unit:

1. Unspeakable joy flooded my heart. (not kidding)
2. I lost all track of five hours of my life.
3. My heart skipped two beats when startled, I jumped up from my bed, convinced that Dylan was playing his harmonica in the middle of my listening room. (in-the-studio sound)


Ok, forgive my speel there, but I think you are starting to get the point: there ARE values out there to be found. This unit sounds better than any other piece of audio equipment I've owned (yes, even the fancy compact disc players with all those highly sought bells and whistles).

I could go on about what kind of equipment I am piping my music through and A/B everything to death, but what good would that do? And what would it prove? The true test is in the sound. I have been made a believer. Drop the word Rega from your vocabulary. Scrape together some disposable income. Fly as fast as your wheels will take you to purchase the Pro-ject 6.1. It's just that good.

Similar Products Used:

Most every commonly used "piece-a-junk" turntable that the 80's t/t manufacturers churned out.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Dec 31, 2000]
David Read
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

High End features without the absurd High End pricetag.Excellent performance.

Weakness:

Hums when used with Grado cartridge.

When my beloved Luxman passed away,(after almost 20 years!),i went shopping for a new tt. I bought this unit at a SoundCity overstock sale for 350$. The first thing that impressed me was the rugged construction, this thing is built! The first thing i did was take the Grado Z2+ cartridge off of the Luxman and mounted it on the 6.1. The sound of this combo was very good,but produced an annoying hum that worsened near the end of play. So i reinstalled the Oyster cartridge. I was pleasantly surprised to find that the Oyster actually sounds pretty good for an inexpensive cartridge. Not to mention the absense of the offending hum. I will be searching for a finer cartridge in the future, however. My advice--, If your looking for a decent tt, solidly built, with high end features, but without the rediculous highend pricetag this is it. Just be careful what pickup you chose.--------------HAPPY LISTENING!!!!!

Similar Products Used:

Luxman PD264

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 25, 2001]
Stefan
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

fair price, good sound, nice design/construction

Weakness:

"cheap construction", hard to align

review also relevant to project 6.9!!

I bought this turntable, as it offers a great price to value ratio. It is cheaper than the Regas nevertheless offers a subchassis construction. This also means that it plays in the league of much more expensive decks - of course it cannot compare to them completely due to the price tag. Last but not least it got good reviews!

The turntable construction(same as 6.9):
The chassis is quite solid, haevy has a nice finish. Not so clever is the dust cover that lets the dust get in. The motor is quiet, but it is not shielded just as the motor electronics so you can hear a little hum, but that is really very minor. The subchassis stands on springs, which is a cheap construction - better decks let the subchassis hang on springs. But of course you have to be fair and not compare it to a 1500§ deck. The platter is ok nevertheless you can see some slight wobbling (.1 mm), which is so minor that it does not degrade the performance - the vinyl is wobbling much more.

The tonearm:
The 6.1 tonearm looks good headshell and shaft made from one piece. The antiskating, and the lift are not so impressing the feeling is not solid but cheap, the lift is quite uncomfortable. Also the VTA adustment on the arm (all these features are the same on all project arms as far as I know) is really bad - just one srew, also making for a bad sonic contact to the bearing and really hard to align. Nevertheless you can align all degrees of freedom of the turntable which is quite good. The arm cannot be compared to a classic like the rega 250 but is fitting into this turntable price category.

The sound:
(I use the project K4 cartridge: better buy the cartridge without the project emblem directly from grado then it is cheaper. It is a unexpensive cartrige, nevertheless performs quite well)
Compared to the 220$ Thorens it is much better. The sound is clearer and more transparent, there is no distortion over the whole frequency spectrum. It is a little bit sensitive to surface noise and the bass is not really seismic. But you can really enjoy music with it. The middle frequencies are not so warm, but therefore the clarity and precision is stunning - probably this is a common feature to subchassis constructions.

fazit:
Best turntable I know for this price tag. Due to the price you cannot expect to buy a "highest end" turntable, but it offers a lot of features common to audiophile turntables, and play really well.

Similar Products Used:

cheapest thorens model

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Nov 07, 2001]
Edgar Fitsch
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

sound, heavy built

Weakness:

none

After stopping listening to vinyl many years ago and only listening to CDs I decided to listen to my bout 500 LPs again. So I went to my dealer and tried out several products. thorens, Denon and this Project 6.1.

I use it with a Grado Gold cartridge and was really fascinated by this smooth, but really detailed sound. Think I´ve never heard my music playing that fine ever before. Even compared to my Marantz 17s Cd player.

For this price, which can´t be compared with any other product of the same quality u get a perfect high end product.

But sound is the one side - and of course the most important one, but this tt also looks perfect and is built perfect.

I can recommend it to all those who love listening analog recordings with a high end product and don´t want to pay unrealistic prices which are often more than the average monthly income.

Similar Products Used:

Dual 501

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Aug 01, 1998]
David Kaiser
an Audio Enthusiast

Very detailed open sound much better sound than cd's I dont understand people who say that cd,s sound better than analoge lp,s.Yes cd,s are cleaner and have less background noise,but with lp,s you have much more sense of space and dimention around the instruments and performers.And thats with a $40.00 cartridge.I have a Sumiko Blue Point on order,I will report on the sound with this better cartridge!

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
[Jul 25, 1999]
Joe Pimentel
an Audio Enthusiast

This is my second venture into the world of high end turntables.The first one I tried was the MMF 2,and I asked myself, What is the big deal.It sounded no better than the MCS linear tracking turntable I was using.So back it went. I was kind of skeptical about this high end crap,but I was willing to keep on trying.I see the Project 6.1 on sale for $500.00.Supposedly this is 200 bucks than usual.so I call up and order One,naturally with the option of getting my money back.
It arrives on Friday,and like a Child with a new toy,I open up the box.I carefully take all the pieces out.Pull out the instructions and try and assemble it.
After calling up the needle Doctor for some Assistance,the instructions are really vague,I'm on my way to the world of audiophilia.I put on an album and all of the sudden i get this tremendous feedback.It took me awile to figure it out.I thought something wrong with the turntable,until I move one of the speakersand eureaka,the feedback disappears.
Now I start listening.All I can say is WOW!Now thats more like it.This is what I expect from spending the money.It was pure pleasure,and I'm not talking about an audiophile recording.It was just a standard pressing.It was one of the best things I have done with 500 bucks.This unit blew away the MMF.
Now I'm not going to get into details like soundstaging, mid, upper,lower,and whatever else the audiophile terms happen to be,it just sounds great.I recommend anyone getting into high-end audio,this is the one to get.Supposedly this turntable has features of more expensive units.I don't know.When I get more audio education I'll be able to tell you all.
The 6.1 comes equipped with an Oyster cartridge,which I will eventually upgrade.I'll appreciate any suggestions for a cartridge under $200.00.
In the meantime,I'll enjoy listening to my album collection even more with this baby.Since this is the best turntable I've ever had or heard for that I'll be giving this the highest rating with no doubt.
5 STARS ALL TH WAY.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[Feb 15, 2001]
stefan hotmann
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

price and great full and warm sound with grado silver

Weakness:

no full dust protection - but who needs that, anyway nothing at this price

got this one as a great bargain - $250 with grado silver

what plays along:
nad silver series pre amp and power amp
kimber cables, musical fidelity phono pre amp
vienna acoustics beethoven speakers
marantz cd 63ki cd player (here for comparison reasons)

long live analog audio!
amazing living sounds filled in my living room after first acords of dire straits love over gold played
grado gives huge precission and dynamics (ok as not as near as cd but different) - almost to be compared to cd performance, but fullness of analogue sound is not to be beaten.

turntable at its best - outperformed my rega p2 with ortofon mc20 (who ever said mc is necessarity?) by any means ! not to talk about my old project 2
simply precise and strong. hits with fullness the soul of an old hifist
for this money - amazing value - if ONLY the arm would be lifted when it comes to the end. . .
(mr.lichtenegger open your ears once for hifists !)
p.s. it is sometimes great to be austrian . . . (when hifi is made/designed here it costs nothing!!!)

Similar Products Used:

rega p2, project 2

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-10 of 11  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com