Kimber Kable PBJ Interconnect Cables
Kimber Kable PBJ Interconnect Cables
[Sep 26, 1999]
Peter
an Audiophile
Kimber PBJ was reviewed by Stereophile (vol. 16, no. 7)and quoted as saying it was close to the performance of Kimber KCAG. I would say that you can definitely tell they are from the same family. I have both and use the PBJ for less critical, less personally involving applications like home theater (you sit there like a limp fish hoping to be stimulated by the next bang or boom, but hey, there are those rare times when you are too tired to think and want someone to do that for you). Slight ribbing aside (home theater can be fun in light doses) the PBJ has plenty of detail but tends to get extremes less defined, not as fast and has a leaner sound stage and imaging than Kimber KCAG (but you could buy >5 pairs for 1 pair of KCAG). It fits in with my otherwise Kimber KCAG, Tara Labs Air2, and Magnan Type Vi (latest version) connected to Threshold Pure Class A and Audio Research Gear. B&W 801s S3. I think there is often a direct relationship between negative reviews of a somewhat revealing cable like PBJ and those just getting into higher end audio. Most of their components have brightness or electronic edge that does not get revealed via cables that are more forgiving and smear the sound. Anyway they are worth 3 out of 5 for performance and 5 out of 5 for value. In high end land small differences mean a lot or too much defending on your point of view. So in the context of this caliber of cable I give them a 5. |
[Jun 07, 2000]
Cyril Cyril
Audiophile
Strength:
Balanced sounding.
Weakness:
None. This interconnect really makes my system neutral sounding. Immediately, the grainy part of the sound was removed when I connected the PBJs. At this price, the performance exceeds 4 stars. I use a tube amplifier with Denon top range CD player with the Dynaudios speakers. Sounds so correct and what I wanted after adding the PBJ interconnect. It make look thin but the result is don't go for size. Similar Products Used: many other brands, lost count. |
[Jan 08, 2000]
Bob
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Nice Termination I have used a lot of different interconnects from the real cheapies to some "respected" ones. I never really thought I could tell much difference until I tried the PJBs between a PV-10 and a pair of Quicksilvers. I could definately tell the difference and have switched back to my cheaper "no name" interconnects. These cables can turn the nice tube sound that many are looking for into nasty bass, screechy high end trauma. My first excursion into Kimberland has taught me at least two things: 1)Cables are definately not made equal and 2) Corey Greenberg has a tin ear. I would recommend using them between source components and preamp and not preamp to amplification. OK for the price if you can buy them used but please do not pay retail for them. |
[Mar 01, 1999]
Gary
an Audiophile
The Kimber Kable PBJ represents an excellent value for entry-level cables but only in certain systems. It is critically important to remember that it is an unshielded cable, such that those of you in large urban areas or other areas with high levels of RFI and EMI will want to stay away from the PBJ.I have compared it primarily to the Monster 550i and must say that the PBJ wins that face-off. The PBJ offered more of everything good, from more detailed system integration, excellent bass control, and a wider and deeper soundstage. The Monster had a more laid-back presentation which detracted from some source material such as performances containing high frequency definition. I found myself uninterested in the Monster's sound but intrigued by the PBJ's level of detail. |
[Feb 09, 1999]
Dave
an Audio Enthusiast
When I compared these to the Audioquest Turquoise, they sounded dull, flat. I was surprised that I could hear that much of a difference with my Rotel RCD-940BX CD. Not impressed. |
[Mar 08, 1999]
Martin Sanborn
an Audio Enthusiast
Quick Summary: Kimber Kable PBJ 0.5 m Interconnects, $69 |
[May 12, 2000]
Kai
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
transparency, detail, weight
Weakness:
none in particular I actually chose these over Nordost's highly acclaimed Solar Wind as I dound them more neutral and having better bass weight than the Nordosts. I've been using them now for about five months and I can't say a negative thing about them. They are likely to work well in any system and with any kind of music. They brighten up smooth sounding sources and gives more weight at the "bottom" end. Similar Products Used: Solar wind |
[Oct 17, 1997]
Winston Smith
Simply stated, Kimber PBJ's are a superior interconnect! They allow for more detail than any cable I have ever tried! These cables are well made, handsome to the eye, and simply said sound just as good (in my humble opinion) as Kimber KCAG, for $300 dollars less! |
[Nov 08, 1997]
Fish
an Audiophile
These are buget interconnects so I'll temper my criticism. In the under $100 dollar price range these cables give good detail, quickness, and resolution. However when the PBJ sounds artificially bright when I comes to vocals, soundstaging is only fair, and image separation is confined. These shortcomings attribute to some musical congestion in the overall presentation. There is good high frequency extension but there seems to be some artificial overextension not true to live music. If you can afford to spend an additional $100, there are a lot of better options. Consider FMS, Transparent, MIT, and Cardas, all of which I've had much better results with. I'll give the PBJs three stars considering its budget price. In absolute terms, I'd award it two stars. |
[Jun 28, 2000]
mike
Audio Enthusiast
I think these cables sound great. They make bongo drums and pianos sound life-like. Sound great with jazz and house music. My system consists of a marantz pm57, cd67se, and b&w 601s2. These cables are a great improvement over my monster cables 400mkii because i like the way they sound not because they are in correct tonal harmony and aural bliss with my components. Listen for yourself you might like them. |