JPS Labs Ultraconductor Speaker Cables
JPS Labs Ultraconductor Speaker Cables
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 18, 2004]
RobertB
AudioPhile
Strength:
An unequalled quality in it's price-class. Beautifully round sound while not loosing any detail.
Weakness:
None within it's class. But knowing JPS now I'm sure the Superconductor FX will bring the same sound on an even higher level. My first encounter with the Ultra Conductor Dual Bi-Wire was while I was still quite happy with my Cardas Quadlink-Five C Bi-Wire and planning to upgrade to the Cardas Golden Cross eventually (I already had these as my interconnects) First I discovered the Superconductor 2 interconnects and my Golden crosses were sold right after. So I auditioned 18 ft. of the Ultra Conductor Dual Bi-Wire cables and they sounded absolutely awful. But I knew they can take quite a bit of burning in, so I patently waited and after a little over a week they revealed all of their beauty. So the Quadlink-Fives are gone and I'm saving money for the Superconductor FX Bi-Wire. Similar Products Used: Monster Audio Quest Kimber Nordost MIT |
[Jul 22, 2004]
Jasper
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clarity, musical, flexibility
Weakness:
Needs its break in time to perform, RCA plugs needed a little tightening (The Power AC+ was the first powercord I bought after having upgraded my system with a new high-end amp and speakers.) - I knew JPS Labs from the special Ultraconductor interlink they manufactured for me to connect my Naim CD player with DIN-style output to a normal RCA. There are just a few adapting interlinks available. Naim advises to use Chord interlinks to connect their equipment to non Naim stuff, and I think and experienced that as wrong. There is more and different in the world and you miss something by not trying that out. The special Ultraconductor interconnect cable that JPS produced for me proved to be way better than the standard delivered and advised Chord Cobra. Period. For little more money as I think the Ultraconductor is a very high value audio cable for its price. This also is the only JPS cable that can be fitted into a DIN plug I believe, because all other cables are much thicker. The Ultraconductor interlink (as the speakercables) I have found really need their time to break in. In the beginning there was just too much high together with the revealing detail. Spending some time to break in the interlink rewards you with a really good cable and proved to be worthwhile. Be patient and don’t judge for the first 50 hours or so.. Luckily interconnects can break in ‘in silence’, speaker cables however.. The Naim player with the Ultra conductor interlink connected, proved to be an easy match for a Meridian player fitted with a Cardas Golden Cross. (Of course due to the Naim DIN connection no cord exchange try outs were possible). The same combination fitted with the standard Chord Cobra cable however I found a rather sad experience after. JPSLabs gave great service by specially manufacturing this cable for me in DIN > RCA style. (RCA > DIN has different connection inside the DIN plug (on different pins) but can be manufactured as well for connecting RCA output to a DIN input). Very high quality at a reasonable price. You just have to know about it. Luckily I found an article about this JPS version on a forum. Naim would provide a great service mentioning this JPS Labs one at least together with the Chord. So that people have another choice and can enjoy their music more. Info about JPS Labs and cables are on www.jpslabs.com Similar Products Used: Chord Cobra |
[Apr 04, 2002]
cryotweaker
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Top end became silky smooth, fast, and detailed without losing any sparkle. Midrange was true, neutral, and natural. Bass was more controlled. So much so that I bought an additional pair to run to my subwoofers.
Weakness:
These cables are stiff, and will not accomodate tight spaces. A small price to pay for the sound you get. Equipment: B&K amp and preamp Modwright modified Pioneer DVD player Custome built loudspeakers from GR Research (see them at www.webgeekdesign.com/guide/). An improvement from top to bottom in sound quality and detail. Everything you read in the reviews of this product are right on. I really cannot add much more. Definately THE budget audio interconnect cable to have. Similar Products Used: Kimber PBJ Silver signal tape Modern Audio Designs Pearl I |
[Dec 05, 1999]
Cheng H.
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Neutral sound, natural treble
Weakness:
Somewhat inflexible due to aluminum alloy The JPS Labs UltraConductor are the most neutral speaker cables I've heard. I'm using a 6' pair and am very impressed! Similar Products Used: Kimble 4TC |
[May 01, 1999]
Jim
an Audiophile
About six months ago I went on a fairly extended research run to replace the existing cables in my system (an assortment of low-to-mid price range Audioquest, plus a 8 meter run of homebrewed interconnect running from my pre-amp out to where I can place my amp to minimize loudspeaker cable runs). Given the need to have a very long run of interconnect I eliminated thinking about anything which would run more than $200 for the first meter, and also eliminated some of the fine unshielded cables out there from Kimber, Nordost and the like. I finally settled on the JPS Ultraconductor on the enthusiastic recommendation of the folks at System Design Group in Redondo Beach. They had recently switched their reference speaker cables over from AudioTruth Dragon (which runs about $4500 for an 8 ft. run) to JPS Superconductor (which runs for around $800 for an 8 ft. run), were starting to connect the majority of their gear in-house with JPS stuff, and thought the Ultraconductor might do the trick for me. |
[Apr 15, 1999]
Mitch Halligan
an Audiophile
Do cables make a difference? Most if not all of the enthusiasts that peruse these pages have already discovered the answer to that question. In fact, a great number of us have already set our sights on our next upgrade and read these pages for confirmation. |
[Jun 13, 1999]
C McDougall
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently purchased a pair of Ultraconductors on the strength of the review in The Inner Ear Report. At the same time, a purchased a pair of Wireworld Atlantis II interconnects. I am very happy with both. Both resulted in a noticeable improvement in sound reproduction (which surprised me, as I was very skeptical). As for the difference between the two, I find the Ultraconnectors to be the most neutral. The Atlantis interconnects seemed to impart more information than I had previously heard, although this came with a (slight) emphasis on higher frequencies. |
[Jul 24, 2001]
Steve
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean, rich and full sound, excellent imaging, great bass. Price paid is for biwired cables with spade ends.
Weakness:
Thin, kinda brittle conductors require careful handling when bending the cable ends to fit speaker/amp binding posts. I don't have much to add to what has has already been said here, but I think you get the picture that these are very good cables. The Ultraconductor cables deliver sound with clarity and majesty, from top to bottom, and should be considered as serious contenders for use in any hi-fi system. The AP Oval 9s were nice but lacked the clarity and imaging provided by the Ultraconductors. The DH Labs Silversonic sounded much better than the Oval 9s in my system but the highs were a bit too shrill for me. Similar Products Used: Analysis Plus Oval 9, DH Labs SilverSonic T-14 |
[Mar 21, 2001]
Arthur
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Refined, detailed sound, rich from top to bottom, revealing in the best way
Weakness:
None at this price point I'm tremendously impressed with these cables. Having recently upgraded my system (Arcam Diva CD92, PS Stratus Gold), my cables suddenly became the weak link. Though I know the Golds have garnered good reviews, as has the Arcam, I wasn't getting the performance out of them that I'd heard in store. Rather than being satisfied with these new acquisitions, I felt there was something seriously missing: namely refinement, detail, and control throughout the whole audible spectrum. I've lived with budget cables for years, having been skeptical of shelling out big dollars for even 'moderate-priced' interconnects and speaker cables. Having read through many reviews, I finally tried the AudioQuest line. The Corals and Vipers did improve the smoothness and detail by a fair margin, especially in the mids and lows, but they were harsh in the top end. In fairness, they weren't burned in long enough as the literature recommends, but at least on my system and with my musical tastes (Baroque, Renaissance) I couldn't risk any graininess or brightness at all in the high frequencies. By chance I came upon the Ultraconductors, read the reviews, and purchased two sets (CD to pre, pre to power). Wow, is all I can say. Very quiet and clear, with no discernible coloration. Also nicely detailed, tonally nuanced and evenly paced, with really tight control of bass (which was a bonus since I was starting to feel that the Golds may be a little too flabby on the bottom end). All in all, it was like getting a new "component" in my system, optimizing performance by far more that I had expected. Plus, the Ultraconductors were supremely affordable, especially in relation to other 'budget' audiophile cables. Bravo. Similar Products Used: AudioQuest Coral & Viper |
[Jul 20, 2000]
James Cebedo
Audiophile
Strength:
Everything about the sound improved!
Weakness:
Looks, that's about it These interconnects might be the best cable between $100-$150. The Ultra Conductor doesn't sound like anything I have heard in this price range. About its sound, everything is more realistic. As if, it gave more life to the music. Bass is tight, solid, and well defined. Midrange is so clear and natural that I couldn't believe that my system is capable of this. The highs integrated well with the mids. Unlike the Kimber Heros, where they sounded a little too prominent in the high frequencies. Similar Products Used: Kimber Kable Hero, BetterCables, Cardas, Clarity Wires |