Parasound CDP-1000 CD Players
Parasound CDP-1000 CD Players
[Dec 23, 1998]
johnny
an Audio Enthusiast
Not Happy:Ordered unit from the states becouse of price and my sister lives there, and she was coming for christmas, Opened the box hooked it up and then the skipping began, Left it plugged in for five days to see if that would help (nope) |
[Jan 14, 1999]
Mark Blount
an Audiophile
I purchased my CDP-1000 almost a year ago. It appeared that the build quality of the unit was first rate (for the money) and I was impressed with the sound during the several day home audition I gave the product prior to purchasing. I used the unit as a transport for a first generation Proceed D/A processor and now have the latest Proceed D/A. |
[Jul 02, 1999]
Steve Haynes
an Audiophile
If you read down these reviews you will see that I posted a review last June. I just wanted to say that I still have my 1000 and it's still great! Since then I have added a Monarchy DIP and a Parasound 2000 D/A converter. The only thing that skips at my house is my 7 year old girl!Steve Haynes |
[Aug 01, 1999]
Brett Roberts
an Audiophile
The Parasound CDP-1000 is a well built player for the price. At least they used some kind of voltage regulation. (I use with a Transparent PowerLink Super power cord, for filtration, and ground isolation). Thought, it's sonics suck as a player, it offers extremely well as a transport. This most likely in part of the C.E.C. transport mechanism and laser assembly. The digital sections excells for the price point ($500); it's also upgradable to AES/EBU, ST-glass digital outputs with the ADAM module for an additional $225 from Parasound. The cool thing is that it's very easy to install. Used with a Monarchy Super DIP, the PLL of the DIP relocks the bitstream of the poorly clocked Parasound (thought the digital output in the Parasound is transformer isolated, something very rare in this price range); then is sent to the D/A conversion. My DAC is a Monarchy 22A (balanced) upgraded and modified by Monarchy Audio. The reclocking device (DIP) is linked to my DAC via. Transparent HDL digital cable. The output of the Super DIP use the SPDIF BNC interface, the input if the DAC uses BNC as well. This digital front end is second to none. Offering the performance of something costing much more. I plan to upgrade the reclocking the the Camalot Dragon, for the use of resolution enhancement. Just remember: Transport: good, CD Player BAD!!!! Oh, take those cheasy gold feet off the bottom and use EAR rubber feet. I recommend 5 stars, just because it's a great transport for the price. 2 stars for it's player's sonics.................ouch!! |
[Oct 17, 1999]
Rob
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great sound stage,excellent imaging,very clear.
Weakness:
The unit Will skip if your a moron. I bought one about a year ago and have had no mechanical problems.I am very pleased with the sound quality. Similar Products Used: none |
[Jun 23, 1997]
Sergey Kalinichenko
an Audio Enthusiast
Excellent piece of equipment for the money you pay. At a street price of about $400, you get a quality tough to surpass. With some shortcomings in the user interface (one needs a remote control to perform some of the functions) you get a CD player that performs its main task, playing CDs, extremely well. The sound this player produces is crystal clear (which is not surprising when you look at its signal/noise ratio spec of 110dB). At the same time, the sound is very much alive and does not leave an impression of artificiality. |
[Jun 13, 2001]
axel
Audiophile
Strength:
Balanced, believable sound, not obviously "digital"
Weakness:
Before mod - bass could be more defined, a little bit veiled Get it used. Free from ususal digital nasties - harshness, hiped treble etc. Installed LCaudio clock XO, very efective on this machine - the mod do not change character of the player, but make everything more transparent and easyflowing, add bass extension/definition. Even in original shape highly recomended - nothing at 200$ will come close. Oh, and it will not play dirty or scratched CD.. Similar Products Used: MFX24K/PSU, Denon 1650AR, Sony X5000ES |
[Oct 12, 1999]
TTN
Audiophile
Strength:
Solid build, nice look, good sound
Weakness:
Not Really I don't know what people are complaining about this machine. Mine I guess is a revised model so I have not had any problems whatsoever. This machine looks fantastic, sound pretty good, pretty clean and detailed. It has all common features and quick reaction times. For around $200 from online, nothing I mean nothing can beat this baby. 5 stars period. |
[Oct 15, 1998]
Alex
an Audiophile
The Parasound C/DP-1000 has performed flawlessly in the two months I've owned the unit. Its performance (via the analog outputs) is exceptional for the money--smooth, clean, detailed, and quiet. The imaging, too, is well above the norm. I preferred it to the Marantz 67SE (too bright in the upper midrange); California Audio Labs DX-2 (audibly grainy in the midrange); and Sony XA1ES (swallowed CDs in two units I tried!). The build quality is unusually solid, the ergonomics are intuitive, and the remote operates without fuss. This is a superb CD player. I doubt you could find a better one unless you spend at least twice as much. |
[Feb 09, 1999]
Phil
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had this cd player for about half a year now. My initial impressions were that it was too bright for my taste. However, after an extensive burn-in period (about 48 hrs), I'm glad to say that the brightness has been tamed. I would say that the brightness is no longer an annoyance, but rather a characteristic that describes this player. I would try to pair this cd player with "warm" sounding electronics nonetheless. This cd player has amazing detail, especially when comparing it to any other cd player under $400. It nearly matches the great midrange on the Arcam Alpha 7, while adding a more solid bass. I feel that the CD/P-1000 is a much better value ($400 vs. $650). The Rega Planet has a much more laid back quality, but I still prefer the CD/P-1000 (especially because it is slighy more than half the cost of the Planet). |