Parasound CDP-1000 CD Players
Parasound CDP-1000 CD Players
[Feb 10, 1998]
Michael
an Audio Enthusiast
Though I've heard nicer players, including Parasound's higher model 2000 which retail for well over $1000, I think this player is a terrific bargain for its price. I recently bought one used and I am very happy with it. I don't care too much about programming, and as some reviews note it is a bit weak on that front. Sound and imaging, however, are fantastic, and I (surprisingly) have encountered no difficulty with skipping at all on any disc I've listened to. For $400 or less if you get it used, I have yet to hear a more impressive player. I compared to the NAD 512, the Cambridge Audio CD4, a Rotel model and a Marantz model (forget which ones) and this one won out on all fronts. |
[Apr 20, 1998]
frodo
an Audio Enthusiast
Mine has never skipped (knock wood) I treat my CDs with kid gloves, so they aren't covered with scratches or fingerprint dirt.. Ive heard nothing better at less than a grand. Check it out! By the way, I understand (from a Stereophile column) that Parasound has extended their warranty to five years parts and labor, ten years parts, for purchases after some datre in January , 1998. In terms of value, I give it a 5. PS: It's still digital. I enjoy it immensly, but will generally pick vinyl if I've got the choice. |
[Feb 16, 1998]
Harry
an Audio Enthusiast
This is a follow-up review of this terrific player. I mentioned in Oct 97 that I had encountered skipping problems. It got to a point where it would not even read off certain CDs. Frustrated, I spoke to a Parasound dealer here in Az (Esoteric Audio - Blake) and he advised me to leave the unit "on" overnight. In fact, I should just leave it on and don't turn it off (unless there is an impending thunderstorm). This is because most digital gears need some time to be thermally stabilized, after which they should perform better. |
[Aug 06, 1998]
Al Melendy
an Audio Enthusiast
Comparisons with Sony DVPs500D showed MUCH better resolution, (I know, I know the s500d is a DVD player, but a darned good one) Anyway, the Parasound is better, it's velvety quiet, and I can hear breath intakes between flute notes on Chesky's Herbie Mann CD. I tried 5 or 6 CD's on both and ALWAYS ended up prefering the Parasound. I bought it used for $300, and I think you could probably find it cheaper. Have had no skipping (hot or cold). I suspect it's the Burr-Brown DAC that is the magic, and guess what ... Burr-Brown is coming out with a new 24 bit chip. Anyway, an oldie but a goodie! |
[Jun 18, 1998]
Dan
an Audio Enthusiast
I originally bought a Marantz 67SE because of all great reviews. So much for listening to other reviews. I then tested a Cal Labs DX-2 and was equally uninpressed. Then listened to the Parasound. Great dynamics, detailed and yet none of the harshness that I got from the Marantz. I've had the Parasound for over a year with no skipping and I am amazed at the quality of the sound. A friend has a Rega Planet and I borrowed it for a few days just to compare. Very similar sounding units although though the parasound had a better high end. Of the two, I would pick the parasound any day of the week. For the money, it can't be beat... |
[Jun 15, 1998]
Steve Haynes
an Audiophile
I am trying to figure out what the heck all you guys problem is with disc's skipping?!? I have had my 1000 for about 6 months and have had |
[Jul 25, 1998]
Dodge
an Audio Enthusiast
Sorry guys. This hunk of junk doesn't work straight out of the box. I just brought mine home, connected it, and it won't recognize ANY CD (0 for 20). I'll leave the power on for a day or two to see if becomes "thermally stabilized" (i.e., it will start working). But come on, the quality assurance at Parasound must be pretty poor if they're willing to ship equipment that doesn't yield a sound on first connection. Shame on you Parasound! I would give this zero stars if that were an option. |
[Aug 14, 1998]
Ed
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently got this cd player and so far, I am impressed. It has a very detailed, likeable sound that I enjoy. I have encountered no skipping problems, and I didn't even have to leave it on for a night as recommended by some of the other reviewers. The build quality is good, and by far, the most noteable quality of this cd-player is the detail. I am surprised that a budget-player like this can reproduce so many subtle details, especially on classical music. The one small flaw I have found with the cd-player is that it sounds a little bright. This could be because it is paired up with my Paradigm M9's (which have titanium tweeters - these tend to get a little strident), or perhaps because I haven't given it enough burn-in time (6hrs. so far) but other than the brightness, I can't name any other flaws. Highly recommended. |
[Oct 23, 1998]
Philip Brandes
an Audiophile
I would like to comment more thoroughly on this player's strong suits but unfortunately after obtaining one long distance (no local dealer) it was dead out of the box (wouldn't read discs). The replacement unit was even deader (tray wouldn't open). Parasound customer support was abysmal, both in the length of time it took to obtain the replacement (4 weeks) and their total unconcern with rectifying the second problem unit on an expedited basis (wouldn't you go out of your way to keep your customers happy)? |
[Nov 14, 1998]
Matt Kirsh
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased this cd player to go with my 1000A amp it preformed good. Sound was all there and clear but for $450 I found a Jolida vacum-tube that was righer and fuller. Reading all the other reviews I can agree that the bun time was very worth it. |