Toshiba W808 VCRs
Toshiba W808 VCRs
[Sep 23, 2001]
Jack
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
None
Weakness:
All This is my second Toshiba 808 and it is just as bad as the first which was replaced. I don't understand how some reviewers claim to get a great picture on this unit...it is HORRIBLE! Similar Products Used: Standard VHS Mitsubishi and GE JVC, others |
[Sep 17, 2001]
Tom
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Speedy FF and Rewind. Better than average picture on extended recording speed.
Weakness:
Badly written manual. Poorly designed remote. Unconventional time shifting control. Overall, this is a nice machine for the money. It replaced a Sony which had a terrible picture (sorry, don't remember the model number), and cost $100 more than the W808. I am using it with a 5 year old 35" Mitsubishi TV. Similar Products Used: Toshiba DX7, Hitachi, Sony. |
[Feb 13, 2001]
Jim Middleton
Audiophile
Strength:
Recorded picture, flying erase heads, setup
Weakness:
The VCR/TV button should be on the VCR as well as the remote and on the remote it should not be hidden under the cover plate but easily accessed. Remote keys not laid out in intuitive fashion. Have you ever watched a movie and when its all over said to yourself "You know if they would have changed one or two little things it would be an acadamy award candidate."? Similar Products Used: JVC 4600, 7500 |
[Feb 11, 2001]
Jim
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
S-VHS
Weakness:
None Outstanding video reproduction from satelite dish. Similar Products Used: Panasonic |
[Feb 05, 2001]
terry smith
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
clear picture even on cheap, slow recorded tapes.
Weakness:
images less colorful and blacks not as intense as on my live direct tv system through sony tivo i have comparexd the toshiba w808 with my sony slv 1000 svhs vcr and find the toshiba picture much more satisfying. i am watching the image on a mitsubishi ws 65907, a beautiful 65 inch television and at that size, all imperfections are obvious. so why do i favor this $220 toshiba model over the $1,000 plus sony model? here's why--the toshiba picture is much more clear. although the colors on the sony picture are more intense, and the black footage darker, there is a lot of dot crawl and other motion artifacts on tapes made at the ep setting on the sony svhs vcr. toshiba cleans all that up with its digital noise reduction system, six heads, and svhs et recording mechanism. sony's vcr was built in 1994, and they haven't made any consumer model svhs vcrs since--i've been looking for one for a long time. the difference in color saturation is noticeable, but i find the toshiba picture very enjoyable. i am mindful of the negative review below which suggested the picture looked washed out. well, comparatively speaking, it is, sort of. but not always. when i watched a tape recorded in black and white on both machines, the shadowy areas on the sony were much darker whereas on the toshiba, they were almost brownish. however, when i wathed tina turner live on cbs, the colors on the toshiba appeared more intense and lively. although the toshiba picture dowes not show as much color detail, the difference is not that significant. what you do get, though, is a cleaner picture, smooth, that looks very close to the original broadcast than on my sony machine. i get a headache watching my sony vcr, or especially the mitsubishi, sonce both show dot crawl and other movement because of the tape moving slowly across the video heads. toshib's mechanism simply wipes those artifacts away and yields a beautiful, colorful picture. Similar Products Used: zenith svhs, sony slv 1000 svhs vcr, mitsubishi svhs vcr |
[Jan 27, 2001]
a b
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
picture quality is execellent-better than panasonic and jvc,except for the ag-1980, but that's over 1k!
Weakness:
the bad reviews below-this player should have a 4+ rating this player is excellent, it doesn't look like vhs,it looks like soft laserdisc, and that's on a good-standard vhs tape! this deck will clean up all those budget ep adult tapes you own, plus and of the old horror prerecords from 1981-the best deck i've ever own, and it rewinds faster than hell-don't like to those reviews below that are bad. Similar Products Used: panasonic 4head, jvc svhs, sony, quesar, samsung, orion, emerson, just about every brand since 1985 |
[Dec 19, 2000]
Donald Moore
Casual Listener
Strength:
none! My deck slipped through quality control.
Weakness:
red and green lines during playback, DNRPRO on by default?? I special ordered this deck from the Good Guys. My deck is currently in their repair shop. I will give them a chance to fix my deck, most of the reviews pertaining to this deck tends to be positive, Toshiba needs to do something about its quality control!! the good news? my Toshiba cdrom drive works great Similar Products Used: none |
[Sep 09, 2000]
michael phalen
Audio Enthusiast
This is clearly one of the best vcr`s out there at any price!! I had an older vcr in the house go down,so I took my Panasonic PVS-7670 unit I had out of my home theater set-up and brought it downstairs to be used in place of the old one,thus giving me a good excuse to upgrade.Ive always been very happy with the panasonic,but this was a perfect opportunity to get a higher end unit.After reading reviews and doing as much research as I could,it came down to the Toshiba and the 4820 panasonic.I went with the toshiba because of the digital noise reduction feature. I was not disappointed!! I did not think a vcr was capable of a picture this good,and I switched to dvd`s two years ago.owning over 300 dvd`s already.I may have to break out some of the old vsh tapes to watch again. I dont use vcr`s to much anymore with the switch to dvd,but I still watch an occasional movie and tape baseball and football games on them,so are still a neccesity for me, and with this Toshiba,it brings back the enjoyment again. This is one hell of a vcr.Yes, you can still fing good cheaper ones,but I did have to have a vcr with s-video,and other than the sony out there for almost a grand (are they nuts!!) this is probably the next best thing!! |
[May 14, 2001]
Scott Davies
Audiophile
Strength:
Flying erase heads, video head tolerance.
Weakness:
Everything else! Poor picture, video receiver, rewinder, DNR, EVERYTHING. This unit was such a diappointment. The previous year I had purchased the standard Toshiba M-785 VCR. I was absolutely amazed at the picture quality when using the Digital Noise Reduction. It made tapes, old and new, recorded on any speed look excellent. When I saw an upcoming model, the w-808, with the addition of SVHS and flying erase heads, I knew I must have it. Immediately upon it's release I bought it. Immediately upon using it I was severely disappointed. The SVHS (ET) picture is very grainy, and the edges are not stable. Most of the color washes out. The DNR on this unit is SO severe that it causes ghost images to trail behind moving objects, especially in scenes with dark backgrounds. The standard VHS picture is far less quality than my M-785. There is a constant flickering in dark scenes, but this is only on the regular VHS picture. The next big disappointment was the video receivers, both for the line in jacks as well as the RF. This unit seems to use some sort of cheap digital receiver which seems to freeze unmoving backround aspects of a received picture, thus causing an obvious digitizing. This is especially noticeable on shadows or scenes with smoke or fog. I could not watch DVD's through it since every image that gradually faded from light to dark was not a smooth transition, but rather blatant digital bands going from light to dark. This receiver also caused interferance when attempting to view or record older tapes that may be a couple generations removed from the original. Just awful. The rewinder is so ridiculously fast that there is no chance of zooming to a particular time on the tape without overshooting it time and time again. I was curious if all Toshiba VCR's have dropped in quality or if these complaints were isolated only to this unit. A person I know decided to purchase the same years model of last years M-785, which is the w-708. When the unit arrived I hooked it up on my TV and gave it some tests. The w-708 was just as excellent as my beloved M-785. The picture quality was the same, the video receiver was the same. The rewinder was still way too fast but that's a minor gripe. I was also very pleased with the SVHS quasi playback picture of the w-708, which was better than my M-785. I decided to purchase a w-708 for myself, and I love it. All I use my crummy w-808 for is constructing tapes, using the flying erase heads and recording in SVHS, and playing the tapes back on my w-708 machine, which seems to offer a better picture in quasi playback than the w-808 offers in real SVHS playback! My obvious assumption is that the w-808 is manufactured by a different company than the w-708, but using a highly inferior design. Had the w-808 just been the w-708 with the addition of flying erase heads and SVHS it would have been the perfect machine. What a disappointment. The only other plus I will give this machine, as with any of the Toshiba VCR's I have used in the past couple years, is the video head tolerance. There are many high priced machines in which the video heads clog, causing a brief white out, from the smallest little imperfection on a tape. This always drove me nuts. The Toshiba machines rarely have such dropouts, even on old battered and worn tapes. Since this plus is also on the w-708 I would still suggest that model over this one any day. Similar Products Used: Toshiba M-785 |
[Aug 11, 2000]
Robert McGoldrick
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
none
Weakness:
poor picture I own a Toshiba M752 regular VHS and I regard it as having the best picture VHS has to offer. When I bought the W808 SVHS-ET I thought I'd get similar picture quality in SVS. Similar Products Used: JVC HR-S9500U ,Sharp VCS101,JVC HR-S4500U,Philips VRA999 |