B&W DM 302 Floorstanding Speakers
B&W DM 302 Floorstanding Speakers
[May 07, 2000]
Jim Lavery
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
can go loud; great for rock music
Weakness:
For the price, none I bought my sons their first stereo system about a year and a half ago. I auditioned these speakers, along with some Paradigms (Titans, I think) and thought they sounded terrific. So - ended up buying the pair along with an entry level Yamaha receiver (35WPC) and a Yamaha 5 disc changer. Have had nothing but trouble with both Yamaha components (the receiver went back for repairs twice; finally got the thing replaced - it was basically DOA) but the B&W's have been a revelation. I've got an excellent stereo system (B&K amp, Thiel 1.2 speakers, Rotel pre-amp) but my room isn't the best. My boy's bedroom is a lot better for listening than our "stereo room" so I'm sure that accounts for a lot of what I'm about to say, but....There are times when I think their little system sounds better than mine. I'm not too analytical when I listen to music. I don't really listen for "soundstage" etc. I've subscribed to Stereophile for years, but I don't listen the way that most of their readers do. So, the message here is kinda simple. These speakers sound great. They can be played really loud; actually, the louder the better. Excellent for rock, but they stand up to quieter music too. Was listening to Incubus (some of their lighter stuff) and there was no doubt that the sound was better on the B&W's than my Thiels. Of course, all that may only mean that the Thiels aren't rock friendly. Anyway - you can't go wrong with these little speakers (they're good looking too)! Similar Products Used: Polk, Thiel |
[Jan 22, 2000]
Glenn
Audiophile
Strength:
For the price, excellent musicality.
Weakness:
Slightly cheap looking. Not exactly fine furniture. I wanted a sub-$300 speaker for my second system, which is used for phono listening and movie watching. The 302s were the last speaker I auditioned, and to me they were the best value. I bought them for $225. Similar Products Used: nht super1, psb alpha a/v and mini, acoustic energy aegis one, mirage frx1, b&w 305 |
[Jan 17, 2000]
RUSS
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good tonal balance, imaging.
Weakness:
Not the deepest bass I don't what you people are talking about how bad Similar Products Used: mission, psb |
[Aug 17, 1997]
Werner
an Audiophile
I bought them for the company, and prior to deliveryhooked them up instead of my normal Quads. |
[Aug 21, 2000]
Douglas Hamilton
Audiophile
Strength:
Transparency, Soundstaging, Crisp Presentation, Dynamics, Solid and Pleasing Midbass.
Weakness:
At this price the speaker is virtually perfect. I bought these little gems almost 2 years ago. They were my first foray into the world of real hi-fi sound. I haven't looked back since. Similar Products Used: Prior to buying this speaker, I auditioned similarly-priced alternatives from KEF, Mission, Boston Acoustics, Polk, Bose, Klipsch. |
[Apr 15, 2000]
brent
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
music sounds great. HT sound is a given :)
Weakness:
They don't sound like a CDM series or Martin Logans (hey, they are bookshelf speakers!) Took me a few weeks to survey all the audio shops in phoenix before I found these. I ended up with 302's in front, cc6 center, and energy eXLS10 for sub, I had a pair of ancient (but excellent) Infinity RS1s I put in the back, and I upgraded my ancient denon to a new one. oh yeah! The paradigm titans were close to the 302s in my ears, but the front b&w setup fit my cost/performance/upgradability needs best. The sound is better than in the audio stores, maybe because of less passthroughs, maybe because of my use of stands, but I'm not sure. Tweaking works. As always there is room for improvement for any low end speaker, but my energy sub matches very well with the 302s for music, and I love the overall sound. As for the other reviews, if these things don't sound good loud, get a better amp or a smaller room. I have these in a decent size room and I have cranked them loud enough to go deaf w/o distortion. The treble and sound dispersion are great and they really do sound larger than they look. |
[Apr 10, 2000]
Marco Maria
Audiophile
Strength:
Sound, price, detail
Weakness:
Poor materials I feel the need to make a some clearness: if you use these little, fantasticly musical speakers for HT systems and say that they have no bass because you pretend to feel your stomach vibre for earthquake movies, maybe you've made a mistake; instead, if you listen to these speakers, correctly positioned on good stands, far away from rear end side walls, and fed up with good cd or analog sound amplified by a good amplifier, you'll feel that these little speakers can make a miracle: they reproduce a full range sound (I've tested them and they go under the 50Hz with ease) with plenty of detail and sound really great. |
[Jan 14, 2001]
James Mackenna
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price, front-ported, optional faux cherry finish, no #$! metal dome tweeter, really shines in a 'live' room
Weakness:
Cabinet shows it's weaknesses when pushed, a 'dead' room will kill this speaker This speaker is a true value in today's market. Speakers get so expensive so quickly, and this little number does far too much for it's price. I bought these for my bedroom, which is a fairly 'live' room, lots of hard surfaces. What impressed me most was their quality of 'evenness', that they don't overdeliver one place to make up for missing somewhere else. Presentation is uniform all along the spectrum. The speakers really shine when mated with a Rotel integrated on clearance. I was not prepared for what came out of these gems. I was pushing them with a cheap boombox until I stumbled across the Rotel. Night and day with some higher quality amplification. Unlike, say, the Paradigm Atoms, which are initially very forward and have a nice bottom. But, like any hot relationship, they turn brassy and harsh and start shouting at you, and that nice bottom is looking pretty heavy. Nice for date, not for a relationship. But this is about the B&W 302's. Similar Products Used: Paradigm, NHT |
[Mar 02, 2001]
James Fisher
Audiophile
Strength:
For small room applications these are great speakers. I have 4 in my bed room running off a Marantz SR8000 receiver and they sound great. they just need a little more boom but thats where the sub comes in. great combination. I am comparing apples and oranges in speakers and equipment between the listing room and the bed room.I found that for the price,size and sound you get you cant go wrong with these speakers
Weakness:
not enough bass Good speakers and good sound and price Similar Products Used: Pardigm studio 100's v/2 in the front, Pardigm studio 40's v/2 in the rear, studio cc for the center and b&w psw1000 for the sub. also Rotel RSP 985 processor, Rotel RCD 971 cd player, rotel RT 955 tunner, Pioneer Elite dv-05 for dvd's and a parasound 2205AT amp. |
[Apr 06, 2001]
Bucko
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
hmmm...if aything...I'd have say no DEEEP end...and dead rooms kill it's beauty!! These are maybe the best speaker made under $500. If you are serious about listeing to music, and no pounding it(rock and roll)...these are it!! Now replaced by the 303 model....I'd buy a used set. Heck after some use I found these speakers to warm up...get better sounding as they got older. Jazz, Classical, and vocals come out of places you never thought of. It is nice to hear the breathe of the singer...the fingers on the chords, the actual sound of the drum reverb. Similar Products Used: Panasonic, Warfdale, Energy, Audio Research |