Cambridge Soundworks Tower II Floorstanding Speakers
Cambridge Soundworks Tower II Floorstanding Speakers
[Sep 07, 2000]
Richard
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very nice quality speaker for the price.
Weakness:
Base may be a little bloated so turn it down on your receiver and boost your sub. I have read these various reviews and there is quite a division here between those who love and those who hate. In short, I have got to agree with the reviewer who said "who the heck takes a speaker out of the box rips it apart right away to study the guts only to return it without hooking it up". Similar Products Used: Listened to more than I want to think about. |
[Sep 04, 2001]
S C
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Crisp, clear sound. Imaging. Warranty. Upgrade plan
Weakness:
Looks cheaper than it should. Easy to tip over Excellent bang for the buck. Sound even better with high power amps. Similar Products Used: Definitive technology |
[Jan 21, 2002]
Superchaz
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great highs and midrange.
Weakness:
Deepest bass (tympani, double basses) could be stronger (see review); large boxes can be awkward; they're not Newtons! Excellent value for $600 (CSW gave me new speakers for the "reconditioned" price--just ask for their best deal; the MSRP is essentially meaningless). Placement of the speakers is very important; CSW recommends they should be 10" from walls, which I found to be accurate. The store said bi-wiring was useless; I found otherwise--they sounded much smoother and richer when bi-wired. My livingroom isn't opimal, so the midrange seems a bit pronounced and bass a bit lacking; if they were near corners this probably would go away, and are minor flaws overall. These minor issues notwithstanding, they're very smooth throughout the sonic spectrum, no harshness or frequency ranges too pronounced. If you don't like these, try the Newton 500's (assuming you've got $1,800 to spend). Similar Products Used: Original Ensembles; Original Advents |
[Dec 05, 2001]
Scott
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good value for price.
Weakness:
Kind of plain looking compared with newer speakers. Very happy with overall performance. For the money hard to beat. I use them for home theater as well as music. In my job I have worked in $50,000 home listening rooms and $100,000 Home theaters. Obviously I can tell the difference however I feel I have a good knowledge of nice sounding speakers. These certainly qualify. HIFI.COM IS SELLING B STOCK T2S ON EBAY FOR $400.00 I just picked up a pair for my inlaws. At this price they are an absolute steal! You could spend this much on some chain store mass market towers and be very disapointed. I have several CSW products and find the quality to be excellent. Having had a subwoofer fried in a power surge and repaired quickly at no cost I can also say that customer service is also excellent. |
[Dec 28, 2001]
Haplo Asteria
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
OUTSTANDING performance for price.
Weakness:
NONE. NONE. NONE. Did I mention that there are NO weaknesses? Review: Similar Products Used: Bose 901 series II, B&W DM605 S2, Advent Legacy II, Paradigm Studio 100 |
[Nov 07, 2001]
Michael Basile
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
flexability,price,bass
Weakness:
none for the price Well folks, over three years of rigging, wishing and listening, I've finally got these speakers figured out. I've read this board for some time, and get a kick out of the different opinions (all legit, I think). As for my own assessment of the Tower II speakers, I'd say you are all correct for different reasons. These speakers are what you make of them, and they can be, very nearly, all you could want in a speaker; certainly so at this price. I just read the posts by Rich and Michael on this board. These two have figured these speakers out also. Similar Products Used: bose 501 |
[Feb 17, 2001]
Scott
Casual Listener
Strength:
Price vs. performance
Weakness:
None worth mentioning considering the cost. I have been listening to my Tower II's for about 6 months now and I couldn't be happier. For $699 a pair these have to be one of the best speaker bargains around. I utilize the II's for about 60% HT and 40% music. In either application the sound is crisp, tight and defined. They handle everything from the intricate, jazz influenced pop of Steely Dan to the sonic assualt of Poppa Roach with equal applomb. As for HT, they do the job and more. Similar Products Used: M&K, Def Tech, ADS |
[Feb 11, 1998]
Samuel Bridger
an Audio Enthusiast
Great Speakers at a great price. The tonal balance is excellent, as is the bass and midrange. Sound is clear and crisp with no flat spots. I listen to all sorts of music, and I can say that the speakers are clearly up to the task of even the most demanding soundtracks. I'll say it again, a great speaker at a great price |
[Apr 16, 1998]
Steve
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased these cannons becuase I figured that they must be good. Do you wonder why Cambridge does not post or share any specs. on the speakers? Because they suck so bad, that they are ashamed. I took the woofer out of the cabinet, and to my suprise, there is no insulation. They are literally using the cabinet to resonate their bass. They sound like a peice of F#@*& SH%!. There is no life or presence only boomy bass and unbalanced mids. I had no idea that there can be a worse speaker manufacturer than Bose until now. 1-Hour after they were out of the box, they were back in the box and being returned. There is no wonder to me the reason why there is so much "B-Sock" at Cambridge. It is becuase most people who have ears, return them. AVOID AT ALL COSTS. |
[Apr 23, 1998]
David
an Audio Enthusiast
These are not the worse speakers that I have ever heard, But thy are the worst $1000 speakers that I have ever heard. The Tower II sound a lot like the speakers you get in a Fisher rack system. |