Energy Speaker Systems C-2 Floorstanding Speakers
Energy Speaker Systems C-2 Floorstanding Speakers
[Jul 25, 1998]
Chris Armstrong
an Audio Enthusiast
Having recently switched from a pair of Mirage M-490's, I was extremely pleased with the C-2's. There is a definite family resemblance between the two but I prefer the Energy's extra midrange detail and overall smooth sound. The smaller woofer,(the Mirage has an 8 inch) and slightly smaller box don't have quite as much slam at high levels, but the extra detail allows me to keep the volume down a bit. I actualy get a little bit better bass extension (acccording to my RadioShack level meter) and less of a mid-bass hump. I have however, recently noticed that one of the cabinets buzzes loudly on certain tracks at certain frequencies. I'm not sure what is causing this although I'm certain it's not the drivers and my dealer says that if it can't easily be fixed, then they will replace the speakers.Overall I'm extremely happy with the sound coming from these speakers and enjoy listening to hours of music through them. |
[Dec 13, 1998]
Eric
an Audiophile
These speakers are okay. Brass instruments did not have enough brass... low frequency extension wanting... piano key strikes not realistic... piano decay not very good. Overall, bested by the Polk Audio 55, Paradigm Studio 20, NHT 1.5, B&W 601,602. |
[Nov 23, 1998]
Harry Burks
an Audio Enthusiast
Just purchased a 2nd set of C-2's. The first set are the front l-r of my surround system, and these were picked up because I needed the highest quality speakers I could find that could fit inside a wall unit's limited footprint. They are teamed with an NHT SW1p sub, and an Energy CS200 center, both also neatly hidden away. They are simply the best sounding "bookshelf speakers" I listened to in trips to many audio stores, and have worked out extremely well for the last year or so. Combined with a sub woofer, they produce excellent home theater in a medium sized room. |
[Dec 28, 1998]
Trien C.
a Casual Listener
Well, I wasn't planning to purchase the C-2 because I already have a pair ofNHT VT-2 Center (600/pr), which I use for listenning. Last week I just got a great deal from (believe it or not) the GoodGuys...who would expect such a deal. |
[Jan 07, 1999]
rich
an Audio Enthusiast
About a year and a half ago I set out to but a new set of speakers. I auditioned several brands, narrowing the field to the energy c-2 and the B&W 602s. I decided on the energys due to their all-around performance. I feel they are the most musical speakers in their price range. A few months after buying the c-2s I got the speaker bug again, and fell in love with the B&W cdm1se. I was about ready to trade in the energys at a loss when the salesperson suggested I bring my speakers in for a side to side comparison. When I got the c-2s on even footing (a good listening room) they were truly impressive. While there were noticable differences in the tonal characteristics, neither I, nor the salesperson could say one sounded better than the other. Needless to say I didn't trade the c-2s in on the nearly double priced cdm1se |
[Jan 15, 1999]
Mark
a Casual Listener
I'd never heard of Energy speakers until, while shopping for components for a second stereo system, I visited a local shop selling used high-end audio equipment. I listened to the Energy Pro 22, which were among a few speakers they offered at a price I could afford. For years I owned a pair of Advent Babys; they seemed decent enough though I never thought much about them. The Energy speakers sounded unbelievably superior. |
[Jan 22, 1999]
Patrick
an Audio Enthusiast
Trying to tame the bass in my room, I was looking for a pair of smaller speakers that would have enough bass, yet not sound boomy, and excel in the midrange and top end. I listened to the B&W 602 & 302, Totem Model 1, Paradigm Studio 20, Linn Tukan, Aerial 5, JMLabs and a gaggle of other speakers before settling for the C-2s. They are a great set of speakers for the money; fast, detailed, with good bass extension, an uncolored midrange, a fairly smooth top-end (give the Aerial 5 a listen for one of the smoothest top-ends I've heard) and a very wide soundstage. I'm still experimenting with toe-in, but these require only a slight toe-in to produce a satisfying soundstage. My speakers are pulled in to just over a third of the room to maximize midrange clarity and not emphasize the bass, and about 20" from the sidewalls. If you've got Rebecca Pidgeon's 'The Raven', put on 'Spanish Harlem' and listen for that instrument (don't know what it is) that's way in the back and off to the right for some serious goosebumps. |
[Jun 08, 1999]
revjac
an Audio Enthusiast
As I've mentioned in another review (Energy 300 centre), I've had these speakers for a number of months and held off the review until I heard them driven by a Yamaha V995 receiver. I generally use them as "rears" but occasionally switch them to the "B" side for music purposes. I have them "bi-wired" I wasn't particularly impressed before the new receiver but things has changed now folks!!! |
[Jun 07, 1999]
Grant E. Eaton
an Audiophile
These speakers are the best I've ever heard for their size and price. I purchased a pair for $450 in December 1998 at a sale in Seattle. You can also buy them directly from a number of Canadian manufacturers over the Web and save yourself a lot of money (the exchange rate is in our favor). |
[Jun 13, 1999]
Steve Rice
an Audio Enthusiast
I looked at a wide range of product. My initial price range was $1,000.00 and below. My search was difficult because of the wide-range of music I listen to. I love traditional jazz such as Sarah Vaughn. I also love electronica music such as Chemical Brothers, Bjork, Square Pusher, and Music Boards of Canada. Finally, I like all kinds of Rock-from Rush to Metallica. Volume is not an issue for me because I live in a small apartment. |