KEF Reference 4 Floorstanding Speakers
KEF Reference 4 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Aug 18, 1999]
Poul
an Audio Enthusiast
I must say, that the investment of KEF Ref 4 is one of the best investments i've efter done. My old speaker, the KEF 105.2 is in every way succeded by the Ref 4, despite the fact that they were modified with new cable and components. The Ref 4 has a powerfull bass, with very low destortion. It seems to go as deep as needed. The midrange is in absolut reference quality. The top is smooth and clean. The scenaria is big, and the easy way you can listen to a single item, and still get the full perspektive is a powerfull experience. There are speakers that in single disiplins gives a better result, but overall, I do think that the REF 4 wins. Despite the fact that I only have 50w in 8 ohm, there are more than enough power. |
[Oct 04, 2000]
DAN
Audiophile
Strength:
PLENTY OF BASS, NICE SOUND STAGE, FLUID MIDS, UN-EXAGERATED HIGHS
Weakness:
NEEDS LARGE ROOM, VERY SENSITIVE TO PLACEMENT I COMPARED THE KEF MODEL 4'S WITH MARTIN-LOGAN ELECTROSTATIC HYBRIDS AND THE KEFS SEEMED LESS "SHRILL" ON THE HIGH-END WITH MORE REALISTIC BASS AND ALSO DEFINITELY HAVE A "BRITISH" MIDRANGE SOUND. HAVING RECENTLY MOVED, THE ONLY PROBLEM THAT I HAVE IS NOT HAVING A LARGE ENOUGH SPACE FOR THEM TO BE UNENCUMBERED BY ROOM DEFECTS. SO I WILLINGLY END UP SPENDING EVEN MORE BUCKS ON ROOM TREATMENTS TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE 4'S. I USE THEM FOR STEREO LISTENING AND AS MAINS FOR 5-CHANNEL HOME THEATER. NO SUBWOOFERS NEEDED. FOR THE PRICE I DON'T THINK THAT YOU CAN DO BETTER THAN THESE, AND THEY LOOK GREAT, TOO! (GET THE ROSEWOOD)... Similar Products Used: KEF MODEL TWOS;MARTIN LOGAN 3 |
[Nov 12, 2000]
Mark
Audiophile
Strength:
Great clarity, seperation, and imaging. These can play any music very, very well.
Weakness:
Price This review pertains to my new Model 4 twos. I tried to get this site to list them, but it has not shown up in 2 months, so I'm listing it under the 4. Similar Products Used: None - other auditioned see below. |