Legacy Audio Studio Floorstanding Speakers
Legacy Audio Studio Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Oct 22, 2018]
jggrmson
Strength:
I rarely see modern reviews for this semi-hard-to-find speaker. I'll say that I have been very impressed with my limited comparisons. I have run these speakers (not the Studio HD, the older version) with a Naim Nait system and a PS Audio system listening mostly vinyl with both a new Rega P3 and an old Rega RP9. I compared them to Dynaudio Audience 52, Epos es11, Linn Tokens, and finally ProAc Pro Response IIs. The legacys sounded better than all of these speakers except the Proac in every regard. The Legacys sounded better than the ProAc in the low and mid-low areas as would be expected of an 8" driver vs a smaller one. The proac also created a slightly wider soundstage and allowed the listen to walk around the room and still hear good display of soundstage- the Legacys demanded you sit with your ear at tweeter level with each speaker proportional to where you sat. Weakness:
Legacys need you to be in their tight sweet spot. Price Paid: 1000
Purchased: Used
Model Year: 2000
|
[Jan 04, 2007]
ykjohn
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Amazing clarity, air, space, speed and sound stage. Non-fatigue. The high-pass-filter (80 Hz) switch.
Weakness:
Lowest base to 60 Hz. Equipment integration difficulty. My review is for the previous version of Studio. These speakers have always revealed weakness of my systems that I have to upgrade my stereo equipment and wires constantly. I even have to modify my equipment internally for pulling the best possible sound out from my studios. Finally, I can tell you what these gems can do after spending 7 years of my efforts. They are competitive to far more expensive speakers including studio’s own brother “Classic” however, with a subwoofer (which I also changed the original driver to one from another manufacturer and modified) integration. I’m writing this for disagreeing the negative reviews accumulated over the years. It’s a shame that these wonderful speakers with original drivers are discontinued. I hope the latest generation still reflects Legacy’s philosophy the best .
Similar Products Used: Legacy Classic, Mission 771 |
[Sep 05, 2006]
bubbagump
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Build quality in spite of one of the binding posts missing. Legacy quickly sent me a replacement. The cabinets are extremely solid.
Weakness:
Poorly chosen drivers for the newest version. Huge gap in the mid range. Too subtle treble from the spiral ribbon tweeter. I own a pair of Classics and a Silver Screen, both of which have brought many hours of satisfying listening. I lliked the previous version of the Studio and went ahead (sight unseen as it were) with the purchase of the newest version, the Studio-i. I'll cut to the chase. The Studio-i is a big disappointment. For starters and at eight inches, the mid range driver seems to be too large. There's a very noticeable hole in the midrange. This is especially noticeable when listening to voice. This is probably a driver better suited for reproducing bass, not midrange. At the least, this is a driver that should be used to supplement another and smaller midrange driver. The tweeter is a spiral ribbon which is fairly smooth but very muted. Cymbols for example sound dull and not very realistic. I have a pair of Paradigm Atoms that to my ear are substantially more accurate sounding than the Studio-i's. Even a pair of Best Buy Insignia KEF knock-offs weren't too far off. I swapped both the Atoms and Insignia's on the stands the Studio-i's are mounted on for comparison purposes. I gave these speakers several months of my time. I used them in a room measuring about 22 X 30 with high ceilings. I have them mounted on sand filled, heavy gauge steel stands. I tried moving them around in and out, side to side. I even tried eq'ing them all to no avail. I'm using them now as surround speakers. In this capacity they're ok but so would many other and less expensive speakers. As an admirer of Legacy product, I'm really disappointed to recommend staying away from these. If you find a previous gen version however, definitely give them a try. Customer Service Extremely poor. If you are fortunate enough to deal directly with Bill Duddleston, all should be well. The person manning the sales and customer support line during the Studio-i purchase sounded disinterested, tired and as if he was working out of his bedroom. Similar Products Used: Legacy-Audio Classics, Paradigm Atoms, Legacy Focus (not the 20-20). |
[May 11, 2003]
Al Leibbrand
AudioPhile
Strength:
Sound,build quality,reputation of company.These are high end period anybody who thinks otherwise,whats in your other room Bose.
Weakness:
Please I had to write because of the negative reviews I read here about these.First what planet are you guys from? These are VERY HIGH END SOUND.Placement put em on something and they will sound good.Awesome sound Similar Products Used: Magnepan,Wharfedale, Infinity |
[Apr 21, 2001]
Vito
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
nice highs
Weakness:
low frequency (keep in mind that this is not a full range speaker), limited dealerships Many of the reviews listed in this column (especially the negative ones) are misleading. I've had these speakers for about 1 1/2 years and I'm pretty pleased with them. I do not understand how anyone can speak so negatively about them unless they have a bone to pick with the manufacturer. Yes, you need a subwoofer to get the biggest bang out of the Studios, but other than that they sound wonderful. The only thing that puzzles me is why they are not more popular. When I opened up the box I was extremely pleased with the finish and build quality (rosewood finish). I immediately noticed how much cleaner they sounded than my previous speakers. While I cannot really determine how they compare to other $900 speakers, I can tell you that you won't be dissapointed. I'm pretty particular when it comes to electronics and have done my share of research over the years. I'm interested to see more opinions on these speakers from other more objective reviewers. Similar Products Used: cambridge soundworks ensemble |
[Dec 12, 1999]
Aaron
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Look, overall sound presense for a bookshelf (base) and at the time, value
Weakness:
Current pricing has put this little guy out of the value range, complete imaging (high) I purchased this speaker in 96 for two reasons: Similar Products Used: CDM1 |
[Apr 09, 1999]
Cast
an Audio Enthusiast
I have owned my Studios for 4 months. For over the previous 18 months I had auditioned several speakers in the $1000 - $2000 range using the Ry Cooder produced Beuna Vista Social Club CD and a Sony compilation of Yo Yo Ma Cello pieces. I was very impressed with the smaller Hales monitor, (listed for around $2100, but I could have had the pair for approximately $1900), and I was equally impressed with the Von Schweikert monitors, at I believe, $1500. |
[Jan 07, 2002]
W
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Not fussy about electronics. Exellent midrange clarity with pleasing warmth. Has the *potential* for a large soundstage - when placed correctly.
Weakness:
Extremely difficult room placement because of rear porting with rear porting also eliminating any possible use as a bookshelf speaker. Weak low end bass. Poor driver integration not as "liquid" as B&W, NHT, etc., with cheap tweeter driver causing some sonic masking issues. Over-priced. In short - look elsewhere. Similar Products Used: Too many to list |
[Mar 11, 1998]
Dave
an Audio Enthusiast
Well, where do I begin? I got a pair of these absolute gems used for $500, and I can safely say that it is by far the best buy I have ever made! |
[May 07, 1999]
George
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had the Studio's for 2 years. I set them on target stands and powered them with an Arcam CD and Bryston integrated amplifier. MIT all the way round. I can safely say that these speakers represent excellent value in terms of sound and build. Mine are in rosewood. Here is my synopsis:Pluses - |