Martin Logan ReQuest Floorstanding Speakers
Martin Logan ReQuest Floorstanding Speakers
[Oct 24, 2001]
christian
Audiophile
Strength:
soundstage, clarity
Weakness:
setting up is a b**** I was at a local high end speaker dealer and saw the requests sitting in back collecting dust. Asked if they wanted to get rid of them and the rest is history. If you are interesed in buying these speakers keep these things in mind. If you are running a intergrated reciever w/ monster cable, you may not like what you hear from these speakers. These high end speakers where meant to run w/ high power class A amps and a tubed preamp. If your system doesnt resemble this set up, I would not recomend getting these speakers. Secondly, placement for these speakers are crucial. These speakers need to be atleast 4 feet infront of the back wall and atleast 2 feet from the walls. You may have to play w/ the placement for days just to find the right spot. I see many of these requests on the online market used I think for the reasons mentioned above; dont think they try to find the right placement. Similar Products Used: none |
[Jan 04, 2002]
Marcus
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Stunning precision and clarity.
Weakness:
You've gotta have the right setup. These speaker are incredible -- don't believe the reviews talking about them being muddy. But -- they must be used the right way. They will not work in small rooms. You need at least 3 feet of clearance behind them for the best sound. You cannot properly drive them with a receiver from Best Buy -- they are very power hungry. Also, the impedance drops to a near dead short -- under 2 ohms at some frequencies. Regular receivers will crap out! |
[Dec 27, 2001]
Jon
Audiophile
Strength:
Looks if your into that
Weakness:
Sound quality is poor at best. Weak bass and dirty highs. I can't see why anyone would spend all this money for these speakers. The sound from them is muffeled and unclean. Thier large size makes them unuseable by anyone who wants space in thier liveing room also. Back to the problems with the sound quality, try to play anything but strings on these speakers and all you will hear is half of the song. Play anything with bass and you willjust laugh at it. To put it short don't waste your money on these speakers. Similar Products Used: M&K s85, s125 and s5000 |
[Mar 04, 1998]
dirk
an Audio Enthusiast
Combines the articulateness of the electrostatic panel with the 12" woofer -- and the combination is nearly seamless. |
[Jun 20, 1998]
G Man
an Audio Enthusiast
Sweet.I am rediscovering my music collection and hearing things I didn't know was in the recordings. The speakers must be broken-in with about 100 hours of playtime and placement in the room is extremely critical. Electrostats have a narrow sweet spot so the reQuests might not be right for every application. But once properly setup in my room I experienced a sonic purity that I think would be hard to match at this price point. The reQuests image well, creating a sound stage that is wider than the speaker placement with great front-to-back definition. The transition from ES mid/high to standard cone woofer is seamless as far as I can tell. Excellent frequency response with crystal highs, unbelievable mids, and great mid/high bass (something that was missing from my previous kit). I lightly supplement the lowest octave with a subwoofer but this may not be necessay for all listeners and/or rooms. The music has a presence, it simply fills the room without sounding like it's eminating from boxes. Indeed, if you were to drop someone into the sweet spot blindfolded they might have a difficult time pointing to the speakers. A word of caution, the other components in your system will make a big difference in the sound from these speakers. Also, the quality of the recording. It was quite a revelation to me to experience the difference in recording quality in my CD collection. My old stereo made everything sound about the same, mediocre. With the ML's, some recordings are nearly unbearable, others are about the same as when played on my old system. But the *quality* recordings are nothing short of amazing. I heard for the first time: Poncho Sanchez's taped hands striking the skins of his congas, that destinctive "ping" that the skins make when heard live; you can almost feel Bjork's breath in "The Anchor Song"; the absolutely live sound of didgeridoo in Trance Mission's "Head Light" or Brent Lewis and Peter Wood's "Thunder Down Under"; to name a few. If you love live music and want to experience the sensation in your own home daily, and you don't mind large speakers (2 ft. wide by 6 ft. high), then I suggeast you give the reQuests a listen. For the price I am giving them 5 stars. |
[May 12, 1998]
William
an Audio Enthusiast
I heard the Martin Logan ReQuests along with the ML SL3's and Aerius i's at the same establishment. I didn't note the cables, but the amp was a Krell FPB 300 and the source was a Rega Planed CD player. As one might expect based on price, the ReQuests (at $4500) were slightly better than the SL3's (at $3195), which were slightly better than the Aerius i's (at $1995). All cast good soundstages, and the bass responses were fairly good (and in the order previously stated), though not of the punch-you-in-the-gut variety. I liked them very much, but none blew me away. Considering that ML's aren't usually discounted much more than 20% (if even that), I think one can do better for the "out the door" money (Meadowlarks and Totems, in particular, come to mind). Also, be aware that MLs are fairly low impedance, so you'll need a pretty stiff amp (like a Krell or a Mark Levinson) to drive them properly. I wish this were a hundred-point scale (in which case I'd give the three 88, 82, and 80 points, respectively). But I'm forced to give all three a rating of 4 stars. |
[Jun 15, 1998]
Doug Cline
an Audiophile
I have been living with a pair of ReQuests for the last 4 months and am growing to appreciate them more and more. I have a fairly big room with a lot of glass which gave me some early problems with hardness and what seemed like a lack of warmth. With the addition of some absorbers behind the speakers the glare diappeared and the mid bass came up. I am using Adcom 5802 and the matching pre-amp and Monster 2.4 cable. I find the sound a little fatiguing with full orchestra but great on jazz, rock and roll and chamber music which is more to my taste. I am considering a sub Velodyne or Dr Hsu but have not made up my mind. Electrostatics take some getting used to, so don't make a hasty audition if this is one of your choices of interest. |
[Jul 22, 1998]
Chris
an Audiophile
I had a pair of M-L Aerius speakers for a couple of years and just loved them, although I did find them a little bass shy. I augumented the bottom end with an M&K dual 12" sub. This past Xmas I found a "motivated seller" who wanted to unload his Quests at a price too good to pass up, so I bought myself a present. I used my Aeriuses as surround speakers, which, combined with my Krell electronics, worked out just splendidly. Then my brother convinced me to sell the Aeriuses to him, and he loves them. |
[Oct 20, 1998]
Miika Jantti
an Audio Enthusiast
A huge transparency and huge price. This is what makes Martin Logan speakers just unbeatenable. I have heard almost every Martin Logan speaker. The Statements are only there which I haven't heard but maybe someday. My own speakers are now the SL3s. The ReQuests was one time in my home and boy. |
[Dec 16, 1998]
Ivin Seabrook
an Audio Enthusiast
I wasn't too happy with these speakers. The imaging is excellent, but there is a "thinness", a "lightness" to the sound. I listen mainly to contemporary British rock, and these speakers don't have the impact or power I was looking for.My Dunlavy SCIV's are better. |