Polk Audio RT2000p Floorstanding Speakers
Polk Audio RT2000p Floorstanding Speakers
[Jan 17, 2002]
Eddie G
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
flexibility, size, overall quality.
Weakness:
none as far as I can tell. These speakers are great. I shopped around and read reviews for a long time, and settled on the RT2000P. I'm glad I did, because I love the way they sound for music and as part of my home theater. I can crank them up as loud as I can stand it, and I never hear any distortion or loss of sound quality. I use them as my front speakers. I have two large technics floor standing speakers which I now use as rear speakers on my home theater. I have to turn the technics speakers way down, becasuse they can't even begin to keep up with the power and clarity of the Polks. I would reccomend them to anybody, especially after seeing how the price has dropped since the time I bought them. Similar Products Used: technics, sony |
[Jun 14, 2000]
E
Audiophile
Strength:
Crisp, clear highs, defined & loooowwww bass.
Weakness:
voices may sound a little thin. Solid, strong, tight, well defined bass. Excellent price to performance ratio. Similar Products Used: Infinity, JBL, & Boston Acoustics |
[Feb 18, 2000]
Andy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
The tweeter is sensational and the bass is outstanding
Weakness:
They are very big As the reviewer below stated, if you are into opera or classical maybe you are better off spending some cash on Vienna Accoustics or Wilson, but for everyone else these speakers are fantastic. There are a lot of people that claim to be disappointed with the current Polk line, but they haven't listened to the 2000s or 3000s. With a matched Polk center (400 or better), they were rated as an "A" by Home Theater and made the Best Home Theater list of recommended speakers. I would have to agree (they are spectactular for home theater). You won't get better home theater performance from anything. Similar Products Used: NHT, Paradigm |
[Feb 08, 2000]
Bill
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Crisp highs, great bass for HT effects I bought these at CC about six months ago. I paid full price (ouch) but still have virtually no complaints. These replaced my dear old B&W 330's so the upgrade was stunning. I love the adjustable subs. You can tweak each one to get the perfect sound for your listening tastes. I have them coupled with a Harman Kardon AVR500, Polk CS400 and Polk RT's for the rears (wanted the F/X but my wife was getting grumpy with me). Similar Products Used: B&W |
[Jan 15, 2000]
Drew
Audiophile
Strength:
Range is awesome, highs ae crisp and clear, lows are phenomenal.
Weakness:
Big, heavy, require extensive amount of time adjusting subwoofer and experimenting with placement. These speaker are fantastic. The dual 8" subwoofers produce incredibly detailed bass. Highs are also extremely clear. These speakers love to be played loud. Any of the posts below that give this speaker less than **** should be disregarded and are most likely posted by employees of audio stores that don't like competing with Circuit City's prices. Home Theater loved these speakers and so do I. Similar Products Used: Paradigm, NTH |
[Dec 31, 1999]
Dan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Built-in Subwoofer, plenty of Bass
Weakness:
Boomy bass, weak imaging, price I finally had to replace my Polk Monitor 7s after 14 years and wanted something for 70% music 30% HT. My first stop was Circuit City and the Polk rt2000p's. Boy was I disappointed! The highs were flat and non-descript, the mids sloppy and the bass was muddy (but boy, there was ALOT of it!). They had an HK receiver powering it and a well-recorded Pearl Jam CD, but I couldn't find imaging or soundstage or much dynamic range. The music just sat there without depth or definition. It reminded me of a friends Real Big Boomy Cerwin-Vega setup in my college days. Because I couldn't believe my ears, I checked the bass settings on the system, and spent some time thinking about the room acoustics; all settings were at 0dB, and the room was large and very well padded with acoustically dead surfaces. There was no mistaking it: This is one bad boomy speaker. I listened briefly to the rt3000's, and they sounded pretty good (but they were around $3000 for the pair!) Similar Products Used: Polk rt1000p, Polk rt3000, Mirage OM-6 and OM8, Def Tech, Monitor Audio and on and on |
[Nov 17, 1999]
Brian LaCroix
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth, detailed bass
Weakness:
Very sensative to speaker placement Originally, I brought home a pair of RT1000's for the front, and a pair of RT800's for the rear. After listening for a while, and not being totally happy with the bass quality, I moved to the RT1000's to the rear, and exchanged the RT800's for RT2000's which I placed in the front. After about 3 months of listening to this primarily for Home Theater, I am extremely happy. |
[Nov 05, 1999]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
One of the best home theater speakers on the market and no slouch on jazz either.
Weakness:
A little bigger than I am used to. I formerly owned Paradigm Studio 80s. I couldn't stand these speakers,because of the extremely poor build quality. The salesman talked me into going with B&Ws, which sound great but have no Bass for my home theater and are only an average speaker for listening to jazz. After readig the review of the RT2000p in Home Theater and having owned Polks for years, I decided to give them a try. Wow am I glad that I did. I hear detail in the bass that you would never hear on the B&Ws or the Paradigms (lots of boom but no detail). These speakers are outstanding for home theater and a true treasure for an audio enthusiast who only listens to jazz. These speakers add to the great legacy of the Polk Audio name and for the money are the best value you will find by far. Similar Products Used: B&W, Paradigm |
[May 24, 1998]
Mike
an Audiophile
This is a speaker which is very typical of Polk Audio. It looks like you're getting a lot for the money, but you really aren't. I listened to them for a while when auditioning a pair of Martin Logans. There was 200 dollars difference between them in price, but it sounded like a thousand dollars difference. On top of that, the Logans didn't really sound all that great. They have a fairly controlled tone, but soundstage is a real problem. They don't have the huge brilliance that you should get in this price range. If you're interested in these speakers, I recommend steering towards the Klipsch Legend series, Boston Acoustics, Phase Linear, NHT, Mirage bipolars, or anything by B&W. Anyone who has listened to speakers for years would be much more satisfied with any of these. With exception to the in-walls, I wouldn't recommend anything made by Polk Audio. |
[Oct 03, 2001]
Gregory
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Huge
Weakness:
Huge Over rated, subs are inadequate and only support a real sub (See HSU). Tweeters sound decent but the mids are weak and lack punch. Great for my center channel speaker between two real speakers and a close timbre match. If I find another for under 200 bucks I will use the RT2000P's as rear center channel speakers. Then I will purchase a Polk CS 400 center and swap the fronts and rears around and decide if Timbre balance for home theater is more important than musicality. Similar Products Used: Polk Model 10A |