Polk Audio RT55 Floorstanding Speakers
Polk Audio RT55 Floorstanding Speakers
[Oct 23, 1999]
Tyler
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Incredible build quality and boxless sound.
Weakness:
Not as deep as you would expect. This is fine speaker. Firstly it's built very well, unlike like most bookshelves which feel hollow, light and cheap compared to their floor standing brothers. The combined weight of these babies is 70 pounds, most of the weight comes from the raised baffel which not only gives the speaker a distinct look but is also an anti-diffraction source. The baffle/bezel is made of crushed rock and glass. Similar Products Used: Paradigm LCR 350. Infinity compositions 1. Infinity RS3 |
[Apr 21, 1999]
Consumer Chris
an Audio Enthusiast
I ordered these from crutchfield. 2 days later pleasure to my ears. C had the best price I could find being the most trusted of the lower prices... Ok, hooked them up to a H/K AVR65 (a good one)receiver, H/K 8350 CD with Digital out ,and along with a CS400. OH MY GOD! Sweet detail city..... Cant wait until my f/x-500's come in late this month... Best combo of quality and budget that belongs in a higher class. |
[Apr 19, 1999]
Michael
an Audiophile
I thought the Polk RT55's sounded good overall. But compared to my Paradigm Reference 80's they didn't have the detail and smoothness. |
[Oct 25, 2000]
Jerry
Casual Listener
I'm a novice in audio land, but my ears know what they like. I started out by purchasing the Polk R40's for $199 per speaker at Circuit City. I wanted more, they simply could not handle the horsepower. I went back to Circuit City to upgrade and the salesperson I know had a pair of Polk RT55's that he personally owned for a few months on the showroom floor. The speakers were in mint condition so I purchased them for $179 each and I also picked up a Polk PSW250 subwoofer and received two Polk R10's for free because of the special they were running. The RT55's are clear and distortion free. The subwoofer provides the base I was looking for and the R10's are wonderful satellite speakers. I have a little more than $600 invested in speakers and have a package that sounds and looks as if I spent a couple of grand! I'm now a happy camper and would recommend the 55's to any enthusiast. |
[Aug 20, 1999]
Matthew McIver
an Audio Enthusiast
For me, the Polk RT-55's have a clean distinct sound to them that seems to fit all different kinds of musical applications. I find them to able to create enough bass and an equal amount of mids and highs. I do believe that a speaker such as the Polk RT-55 is greatly accompanied by a Polk PSW-150 to get a more robust bass response that most people like. Myself, with a full Polk system, I have no complaints, and for those who do, well, you obviously don't know good sound when you hear it! |
[Sep 22, 1999]
Chris
an Audio Enthusiast
Great sounding speakers. I only found out after I purchaced them that they do not like High-Current amplifiers. So now I am dealing with getting both tweeters replaced. Other than that when they played, great! 4 stars due to the tweeters. |
[Apr 05, 1999]
Anton
an Audio Enthusiast
I upgraded to a pair of Polk's RT-55 bookshelf speakers, up from an old pair of KLH speakers, after auditioning several bookshelf and floorstanding models from several mid to high-end companies. In the end I went with the RT-55's because of its rugged and progressive build quility and top-notch sound. It thumps out more, and cleaner bass than many floor models and has a wide sweet spot thanks to its large 1 inch tweeter. I had to adjust the crossover on my Velodyne sub due to the speakers impressive lower end, but on the whole the speakers output did a good job of masking my sub's location, something many bookshelf models fail to do in home theater set-ups. The dual 6 1/2 inch woofers are as tough as anything I've ever tested. I drove them at nearly full tilt on my sony str-da30es receiver with no signs of audible stress or wind noise; the plate port on the back of the unit is not just for decoration. |
[Mar 09, 2000]
beetlefan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean, easy, smooth highs and mids with no midrange bloat or brightness
Weakness:
For a bookshelf model, I can't think of any! These puppies really let the music breathe, allowing the natural sound of the source to come through. Circuit City must be making a killing off these puppies! While shopping for a stereo system for my mother in-law last year, my wife picked these up while there, and i've been wanting a pair ever since. I'm an apartment dweller and the early eighties tower dinasaurs were taking up space and didn't sound so great anymore. |
[Mar 25, 2000]
Kent Klima Jr.
Casual Listener
Strength:
Great build quality, very crisp, tight sound
Weakness:
none that i can find. I am very pleased with these speakers. At the time for $600 I thought they were a little spendy. But once i listed to them in the show room, and since getting them home, believe they were worth the money. Similar Products Used: Bose 301's |
[Jul 02, 2000]
Phil
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Wonderful expansive soundstage, tons of bass, extended highs, very "unboxy" sound
Weakness:
Heavy coloration in the upper-bass/lower midrange. Boomy upper bass hump. I was very dissappointed in these speakers. In an effort to pump out truckloads of bass, the lower end of these speakers is unbearably sloppy. Boomy bass which colors male and female vocals ruined the overall sound. Even though they imaged beautifully and the highs were fairly smooth, I couldn't live with the boom. If you want tons of bass, and don't care if it's accurate or not, these are your speakers. But if you have a sub, and natural reproduction is your preference, make sure to compare these speakers with others in the same price range. i A/B'd these with the Mission 703. While the Missions sounded a bit boxier, they blew the Polks away in every other respect except imaging, which was still acceptable. In the end, I went with the Vandersteens (review coming soon). Similar Products Used: Mission 703, Mirage FRX7, Paradigm Monitor 7, Tannoy M5, PSB Image 4T, B&W 603, Vandersteen 1C, NHT Super2 |