Wilson Audio Watt/Puppy v5.1 Floorstanding Speakers
Wilson Audio Watt/Puppy v5.1 Floorstanding Speakers
[Dec 29, 1997]
Paul Aieta
an Audio Enthusiast
Auditioned the WATT/Puppies at Audio Perfection (near Minneapolis) through Wadia front end and a pair of exquisite Italian tube amps (brand?). At the time I hadn't yet heard of Wilson (hence "enthusiast", not "audiophile") but I trust my ears from years of trumpet playing in the orchestra and late night Pat Metheny listening sessions. Source was a delicate piece by Lee Ritenour. Summary: almost made me cry in the middle of the store! This system had provoked a greater love for well recorded music than a Levinson/B&W Silver Signature 30 setup I heard on another occasion. However, at under $3000/pair used, I'll be looking to buy some B&W 801's and will start saving for the right amp, unless my near-cry experience has made someone out there want to donate a cheap pair my way? Any takers? |
[Dec 29, 1997]
Hans Dales
an Audiophile
These speakers are the best i ever heard, if they have a midbass blump listen to |
[Jan 23, 1998]
maven
an Audio Enthusiast
Heard the Wilson Watt Puppies through Mark Levinson/Sonic Frontiers digitalfront end, Cello amplification and Transparent Reference cables. It's transparent; |
[Feb 21, 1998]
Bob Wood
an Audiophile
Recently replaced my Theta Data Basic II transport with Theta's new Jade. This feeds my Theta DS Pro Basic IIIa. More space. More air. Less congestion. |
[Feb 26, 1998]
Rick
an Audiophile
The Wilson WATT/Puppy combo is one of the industry's cornerstone products and defines hifi, versus music lover enthusiasts. ALA Theil and Dunlavy, the presentation is clinical and etched. Musical, they are not, over-priced they are. Compare the sublime ESP Concert Grands at a similar price, and you will clearly discern the difference between hifi and music. |
[Apr 17, 1998]
Jon VonOhlsen
an Audio Enthusiast
Measured on-axis response for the Watt puppies is about +/-5dB over the range of 400-20K. This is poor for such an expensive speaker with claims to accuracy. Also, one can hear the deviations pretty clearly. If Wilson can't even get response correct, how can the "magic" occur? Throw your money elsewhere. |
[Apr 03, 1998]
Kimball Corson
an Audiophile
I join the chorus of those who believe the Watt puppies are too little for far too much. I have never liked them, and would't at 1/4 their price. Amusical, the hump, the lack of air, the in your face quality, that won't go away except by turning them down, in which case they all but disappear. The dynamics are a mess, especially the microdynamics. It is amazing Wilson did them, given the set of ears on him, evidenced by the WAMM. A 4 objectively, a 3 subjectively and a 1 for value. |
[Jun 13, 1998]
Florin Penciu
an Audiophile
They are the second best speakers I have ever heard. Incredible dynamics,incredible detail and transparency, the best soundstage and very,very open |
[Jun 13, 1998]
Yee Fung
an Audiophile
The first thing you notice when you listen to Watt Puppies is the Bass thump. There definitely is a bass prominence around 60 htz. The is almost no bass below 30 hz. Dynamics amd transparency were truly excellent, but mids lacked natural warmth. If this were a $6000 pair of speakers, they would be competitive. However at their asking price, they are a absolute joke. |
[Oct 22, 1998]
Joy Arenas
an Audiophile
While a good speaker, it just can't compare to other high-end speakers--the Duntech Sovereign and the Prince. TheDuntechs will image and provide a better bottom end than the Wilsons, but if you add a subwofer to the Wilson, you have an extremely precise loudspeaker, but you have raised the price well past $25,000(USD). For pure listening enjoymment it is hard to beat the Prince |