Sony SA-WM40 Subwoofers
Sony SA-WM40 Subwoofers
[Apr 23, 2001]
Brent Giles
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Detaild bass, goes low and loud , crisp clean bass, shakes every thing, powerfull bass, DEEP DEEP bass, and talk about the price $399 thats a steal, ohh my god did i say this thing can do 23hz , you can relly feel the bass big time as well as hear it.
Weakness:
are you kidding When you think of sony speakers you think of cheap sounding jap speakers wright ? WRONG not any more ( well just for this product ) after reading reviews hear i had to see this thing. Similar Products Used: Heard Magnat ALPHA 25-A which cost $700, also the Klipsch KSW-12 cost $750 sounds better for music but the sony kicked its arse for home theater. |
[Feb 15, 2001]
Wayne
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Value, Attractive styling that blends in with my other Sony stuff
Weakness:
None..This is the best sub under $400 period To those MORONS who come her only to put a good sub down!! Grow up and get a life!!. You fools probably still live at home and go window shopping on weekends!! Similar Products Used: JBL's and Yamaha |
[Feb 15, 2001]
Neal
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
$700+ sound for a $200- price.
Weakness:
I wouldn't be pretty sitting out in the middle of your room, but you won't notice it sitting back in a corner. I'm the guy who reads every review, compares every model, then finds the best value on everything I purchae. After reading all the favorable comments about this subwoofer, I went around town and did side-by-side comparisons with other major consumer brands (JBL, Klipsch, Yamaha, Cerwin Vega, Polk, AR, etc. etc.). I not only switched back and forth listening to subs running off the same source, but I also put my hand in front of each speaker to measure air volume displacement (and that's what a good sub does, folks). The Sony moved more air at lower frequencies and with less distortion than any other brand and at any price below $750. I stopped comparing above that price line because paying more for a single speaker would be silly. Similar Products Used: Allison Acoustics |
[Mar 18, 2001]
Samuel Sundaram
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
It sounds good..
Weakness:
You gotta break it in (duh). To all the insane people claiming that "false people" are posting false reviews of this product, let me simply ask "WHY?!?!" Are you guys freaking mental? This sub isn't made by some backwoods hicks making inferior subs to pay the rent that send their cousins to websites in an effort to boost sales by writing false reviews.. This is made by SONY.. A company that couldn't give less of a funk about people like us- they make billions without us geeks (no offence guys ;). Seriously, sony makes crappy speakers, it's a fact.. But somehow, by some weird fluke, they made these great subs. Does it sound good for music and movie? YES... My last sub was GREAT for movies but sucked for music- I'm happy that this guy does both flawlessly (that's after careful adjustments and letting it break in). Is this sub a great value? HELL YEAH. Simply the best sub that costs under $400 (I've tried about 5 of them- since I'm a college student trying to finance a film I couldn't afford to test anything above that personally- but it did beat out an $700 klipsch that I tested at circuit city). Similar Products Used: Optimus, JBL, and KLH subs |
[Jun 10, 2001]
Steve
Audio Enthusiast
Following up from a previous review, I took the advice of a reviewer and stuffed the cabinet (well not completely stuffed) of the sub with polyfill. What a difference it makes in regards to tightness for music. I, like some other reviewers, noticed that the sound for music could be a bit boomy at times. Filling the cabinet has made the difference, transforming the Sony from a sub that competes very well in the $300-500 range to one that competes well in the $1000 + range. Haven't tested a DVD yet, but hoping it will tighten up the sound on movies too. Great suggestion for the reviewer who tried this. Wow, this sub friggin' rocks now... |
[Jun 13, 2001]
Frank Westphal
Audiophile
Strength:
value
Weakness:
having to wade through snotty pretentious fools like the EAR To the "EAR" ....please go away I have read your reviews |
[Jun 13, 2001]
Gregg Carter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great value, great sound for movies
Weakness:
Slightly boomy for music I bought this sub based on reviews here and hometheaterforum.com. So far, I am very happy with it. It's real big, but I hide it behind a chair. Very easy to set up, and sound really makes a difference. I may try the polyfill fix to take care of the boominess, but overall it shakes my house to the foundation. Highly recommended. Listened to Polk and JBL subs, and found this one at least comparable to $500+ subs. Similar Products Used: none |
[Jun 14, 2001]
Andy
Strength:
Good detail on bass response. If bass is what you are looking for this is the one.
Weakness:
For the price, it has no weakness it's comparible to subs costing three times it's price. I'm hear sitting watching the screen looking at all the junk everyone is writing to each other. And it just makes me laugh. I am a professional sound lab competitor and tester (not a vendor, I don't sell anything) but I want to write my comment as a consumer. I shopped around for several weeks comparing prices, with features and brands. At first I had my mind set on Cerwin Vega who has been a dominent force in the subwoofer industry for several years. But when I tested a 15", $400 sub and compared it to the little 12', $200 Sony sub I did'nt really get much of the diffrence on the frequecy response and overall decibel level from one to another I could'nt see why I should pay twice as much. The same thing went for the JBL 12" model I tested. The Bose was a bit richer in it's sound quality but once again it was nothing to glote about. As for the more expensive subs costing from $1000-$5000 in comparison to the Sony, ask your self is it really worth it for the money. Consider this, valuable scientific research has determined that the average human ear cannot hear frequecies lower then 20 hz and a small percentage of people (not the average) are able to hear frequencies lower then 15 hz. So why would you want to get an expensive sub able to play super low frequencies if you can't hear them. And if you say you can hear them; well then that tells us that your father SATAN taught you well on how to lie. :) Is there a great deal of diffrence on the sound quality from the Sony to the $1k-$5k subs. Well you do get a little more bang out of the more expensive ones, and they are able to handel the frequeny response a little bit more adequate. But you must understand that the experience will be the overall same experience, and ultimetly you will be achieving one same thing BASS. So for the little diffrence,is it worth being a few thousand dollars short in you bank account to listen to the bass in your music and movies? Similar Products Used: Cerwin Vega, JBL, Bose |
[Jun 12, 2001]
Craig Vinson
Audiophile
Strength:
Great bass
Weakness:
?? This is a follow up to a review I posted before. For those experiencing the "boom" factor, try moving the sub AWAY from the wall! Yes, this may fly in the face of convention, but since the sub has such a long rear-firing port, the effect is a boomy sound when placed too close to the rear wall. |
[Mar 21, 2001]
David Hannsen
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
nothing relly the bass is kinda weak.
Weakness:
yes there is some weaknesses for instince this sub relly lacks low end reproduction bass. when the level control on the sub is turned up about to the nine o clock point and my amp is turned the about 28 the sub will distort and bottom out & you relly dont hear any deep bass just port noise. weak bass you dont get any deep bass the bass stops around the 38 to 42 hz point any lower and the sub distorts or bottoms out OR you will hear port noise. Similar Products Used: Audio Source SWFifteen |