Sony KV-36XBR400 Standard Televisions
Sony KV-36XBR400 Standard Televisions
[Dec 20, 2000]
Troy
Audiophile
You are completely wrong David....the xbr does not effect progressively inputed sources. I don't know where your getting your info. As for the 6200...it's ok but the 9000es destroys it completely. And the xbr400 is a awesome tv period. Sony makes great video, if you want to sell toshiba stuff than go work for them.... |
[Dec 20, 2000]
Alexander
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Response to David's further misstatements below. David, the XBR400 automatically disables the DRC when fed a progressive scan signal (such as 480p). Unlike you, I actually own the television you reviewed, and I can say with factual certitude that the TV does indeed bypass the DRC when given a progressive scan signal. Your statement below seems to be largely based on conjecture (ie. I couldn't find any literature that stated the DRC is disabled, therefore it must not be), and alleged conversations you had with dealers. |
[Dec 20, 2000]
David
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
You can't turn of DRC for 480p. As a follow up to my statements below... |
[Dec 21, 2000]
David
Audio Enthusiast
I was wrong. |
[Aug 21, 2001]
Greg Lara
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
Introduces digital processing artifacts? I went to the store to check out the 36XBR450. The test DVD looks fabulous! Just like HDTV. However, I was very disappointed by the display of of cable TV. The problem was most noticable while watching cartoons (Tin Tin). The images were composed of simple line drawings with solid color fills. In the colored areas adjacent to the black lines you could see smudges of black. This looked exactly like artifacts created by low-resolution MPEG2 compression (like videos downloaded over the internet or low-resolution recordings on a PVR). The store staff claimed that the TV was merely revealing the limitations of the source video. However, on the low-cost TVs (using the same video feed) next to the XBR the images were clear and crisp. I am almost certain that these artifacts are introduced by all the digital signal processing going on inside the XBR. Because you cannot turn of these functions, there is no simple way to prove this. However, when I switched to the 2-screen or PIP mode, these artifacts disappeared. Not because the resolution is lowere--there were no artifacts at all--but, I assume, because these smaller images do not receive the same processing. Similar Products Used: Sony Trinitron |
[Aug 23, 2001]
highlander
Casual Listener
Strength:
Can look very good on majority of sources
Weakness:
Like last reviewer..ARTIFACTS!! I had the same experience as the last reviewer. This tv |
[Aug 23, 2001]
Greg W
Audiophile
Strength:
Picture, Picture, Picture.
Weakness:
None I recently upgraded from the 32XBR400 to the 36XBR450, and had the same feelings about the poor imaging when connected to analog cable. I had no other reference point, so I simply assumed that this was what I should expect. Similar Products Used: XBR400 |
[Jan 23, 2001]
Ken
Casual Listener
Strength:
Much better than 20 inch GE
Weakness:
cost, DRC??? Need some help, printed the entire 80 pages of oppinons. I know that anything will be better than 20 inch TV that I am currently using (long story) but I am worried about two things, one my source...Digital Cable. Will I see an improved picture over 20in(Don't laugh) or will it just magnify poor quality that I wasn't already seeing. Used to have DSS but now not possible. This leads to my second big confusion and that is about DRC. I have read that it can't be disabled and yet at the same time I am reading about people using progressive scan DVD or external line doublers like DVDO. I am under the impression that both of those are better than DRC and would improve clarity but I am also under the impresion that they can't overide DRC. Anyone with answers I would appreciate. Similar Products Used: 50in Mitsubishi Big Screen (It brings me to tears thinking about it) |
[Aug 20, 2001]
Joe
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Picture; Have to see it at home to believe it.
Weakness:
Weight, stand This is for the Sony XBR450: Similar Products Used: RCA 38" WS, Toshiba pioneer sony projection HDTVs |
[Oct 28, 2000]
Mahmood Mohammadi
Audiophile
Strength:
Picture quality, features, conectivity
Weakness:
Factory settings are joke, pixle cropping/line cropping, Orangigh red, dim unless the picture setting is cranked up way high It is a well designed tube based TV set. But I tell you, do not expect to get the set and turn on and say wow. If you have high expectations and have trained eyes, out of box settings will disappoint you. The brightness of the sample I got was so low that I had to crank it up 15 clicks to get proper shadow detail. The shadow looked red & blue and there are some geometry error that cannot be ignored. When I displayed a white pattern from the VE, I saw a soft circular pattern burned in to the apperture grill. It is most visible on the right side. The gray scale is way out and like I said before the sub-brightness was way too low. Despite all the problems, it is well designed set but assembled and calibrated horrondously bad. XBR owners deserve better. I wonder who Sony think is targetting this product to??!! Once the set is calibrated (via service menue), it will drop your jaw. Picture is beatifull with lots ofdetail and color. So if you are considering to buy this set, you should consider to shell out a couple of hunded dollare to get this set where it is meant to be. This is the state of art TV set by design but it is not set up properly by Sony of America. Just be aware of that. Similar Products Used: Previous XBR owner (2 sets) |