Denon AVR-3600DTS A/V Receivers
Denon AVR-3600DTS A/V Receivers
[May 13, 2001]
Dana
Audiophile
Strength:
Plenty of power. 5.1 is the best i've heard. Excellent construction
Weakness:
Remote is a bit bulky, lack of 6 channel inputs and worst of all has only 1 optical input. I picked up a onkyo 939 for 850.00, It's protection circuit would not handle my 4 ohm Fideks. I traded it outright for the 3600. It has never shut down and I have no other problems to report. My 2 favorite features are 5 Channel stereo, which releases 90 watts to each of my full range speakers, 2nd is the bi-wiring capabilities which allow me to run 2 full range towers for a center. Similar Products Used: Onkyo tx-ds939, Denon avr2700, yamaha 995 |
[Dec 13, 2001]
Bill Renfrew
Audiophile
Strength:
Nice appearance.
Weakness:
Not enough clarity/power. I'm convinced they're over-rating their power. I borrowed the Denon to evaluate before purchasing. I A-B'ed with the Harmon Kardon AVR 7000 and the AVR beat the pants off it. My take is the Denon isn't bad for casual listeners, but to the discerning ear I'd go with the HK. Their stuff ROCKS...and with a nice Veladyne 15" sub you'll be knocked out. The Denon price/value was, in my opinion, way out of line. My take was it's more of a consumer unit with pro hype, where the HK really delivers. Similar Products Used: HK AVR-7000 |
[Jun 19, 2001]
Kitty Whong
Strength:
Well built and price
Weakness:
Not enuff optical inputs (only 1) and no 6.1 upgrade Handles all my AV needs without a hitch and plenty of power. Bot it at a close out when I couldn't afford to buy the 2001 model 3801. Pleased to find out how well built the receiver was and the simple operations. Not a lot of bells and whistles, just plain competent. |
[Dec 01, 1998]
jhav
an Audio Enthusiast
Hi Everybody,I recently exchanged my DENON AVR-3200 for the DENON AVR-3600DTS. I really liked the 3200, but they store that I purchased it at was having a pretty good sale & I was able to get the AVR-3600DTS for about $300 less than it usually sells for. Anyhow, before I purchased the AVR-3600DTS, I also tried out the Yamaha RX-V2095. In the store, I thought that the Denon sounded a little clearer and had a little more punch to it than the Yamaha - however, I have no idea weather either unit was configured correctly, and the speakers that were used are not the one's that I own. |
[Dec 17, 1998]
Mark Mattoon
an Audio Enthusiast
Very happy with the Dennon 3600 DTS. I've been living with it for a couple of weeks now. Sound is clear and well defined, though with my Polk RT-2000 speakers the upper end and midrange seems just a tad dry for music listening. The Pioneer I replaced had a nice warm sound. I certainly don't have a golden ear, but a couple of friends claim too and they say they don't hear it. They say the sound is "very detailed and neutral with no coloration". To me, it sounds a little dryer than my old Pioneer, but still great. Note that your milage may vary due to your personal preferences and setup. |
[Dec 17, 1998]
Mark M
an Audio Enthusiast
Need to amend my review. This unit does NOT have 6 channel inputs. Please dsiregard that portion of my review. Sorry for any confusion this may have caused. This also makes adding an off-board decoder impossible. Still rate it 4 stars though. Again, I appologize for the mis-information. Must have killed that brain cell last night. |
[Dec 07, 1998]
Arty
an Audio Enthusiast
Like you, I am also interested in either the Denon 3600 DTS or the Yamaha 2095. As the salesperson explained it to me, the Denon's DTS was an after thought, while the Yamaha's DTS is integrated. The Denon 3600 DTS has nothing to differentiate between the older version other than a sticker on the front panel. Not even an indicator light showing DTS processing. Because of the lack of a DTS indicator, and no 6 channel input for upgradability, I'll rate it 4 stars. |
[Jan 02, 1999]
Gary Van Booven
an Audiophile
I have a Harmon Kardon AVR 25 Pro Logic reciever. I purchased a Denon 3600 reciever to replace it. The numbers on the 3600 all said that it should out perform my HK recever. I paid $1000 for the receiver from Sound City. I hooked it up to the exact same speakers in the same room that my HK receiver was hooked up in. I went through the setup witch is quite lengthy. Set all of the speaker distances up as required. It sounded like S***!!!!! My first thought was that I had the setup wrong. I called the tech people at Sound City and they walked me through the setup on the phone. I had it setup correctly to begin with. |
[Apr 30, 1999]
KL
a Casual Listener
Bought it from Kief's Audio through mail order. Very good service. Originally, we planned to buy AVR-3200, but we can't do it after hearing the sound from AVR-3600 even it costs twice as much. For music, it sounds very natural with lots of details. It fills up the room with music even when it's played quietly (~ -30db). I am now in the process of re-listening my CDs (400+!!). 5 channel stereo is fun too, but I would prefer listening to it the old way. Don't really care about the DSP modes. The setup is not complicated per se, but understanding the menu takes some time. The on screen menu is also helpful.I am very satisfied with the performance of this receiver. |
[May 25, 1999]
Steven
an Audio Enthusiast
Well guy's I am trying to get the best for my ear's and I need some help from you guys. All of these receivers offer you different aspects of the sound and that's why it's hard for me to make my decision. Ok,I am selecting from the following receivers the HK -AVR65, the Yamaha 995 and the Denon AVR-3600DTs and of Course with the Onkyo, plus I am trying to match them with the best speakers not going more than 900, So I am between the NHT Super Two's, Paradigm Monitor 7, Paradigm Atom with a Subwoofer, the KEf Q55, Polk. Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated, since I think all of them offer excellent sound quality, Has far the Denon 3600 Is a very impressive one, a brutal HT Experience but only have a one down is the "PRICE" I know!! if you whant to get good quality you have to put some $$$, otherwise nice receiver. |