NAD T760 A/V Receivers
NAD T760 A/V Receivers
[Sep 25, 2001]
Jonathan Rosario
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Considering what I paid - great value.
Weakness:
As most have said, the remote. More dig inputs would be nice .. Pretty much mirror most people's reviews .. none of the ambience modes I never would use anyway.. great stereo sound partnered with Epos ES11 and Nad 512 cd esp. with the music I prefer - vocals, jazz, a little techno ..) .. seemed to get better as the receiver got "burned-in" .. Similar Products Used: HK AVR25 |
[May 09, 2001]
Anders
Audiophile
Strength:
Power and simplicity
Weakness:
Remote, get the Marantz 2000 MkII! I am a bit confused about those complaining that the sub out isn’t active in stereo. Why should it be active? |
[Mar 25, 2001]
Who cares ?
Audiophile
To Sebastian..... |
[Mar 25, 2001]
Who cares ?
Audiophile
To Sebastian..... |
[May 18, 2000]
Lawrence
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very Good Imaging, Warm, Clean, Easy to use Remote
Weakness:
A bit lack in Power and trade-off in volume setting between surround channels and overall volume I compared it with ONKYO 575 and YAMAHA 795. It simply blows away the other two in imaging, clarity and warmth. That is what I was looking for beside the needed Surround Sound performance. I did not find any HUM nor losing Radio Station setting problem as posted in some other reviews. It is an AV amplifier of real bargain. I am satisfied with the surround sound performance. However, I still found it a bit lack of power, maybe because it is a 60W receiver. Another weakness is the trade off between the volume setting and the surround channel settings. For example, if I turn up only my subwoofer by 9 dB, my volume setting becomes maximum at only 9 dB instead of the original 18 dB. That is a reduction of 9 dB in maximum volume for the Front/Centre/Rear channels. The minor weakness would be unable to switch off the digital display. It would be nice feature to have. Overall performance, I still rate it as an outstanding quality AV receiver for a reasonbly low price. Similar Products Used: ONKYO 575, YAMAHA 795 |
[Feb 11, 2000]
Cristian
Audiophile
Strength:
Very good music performance, Good HT performance, good value (almost all in one features at a good price).
Weakness:
Video output is not very good. Speaker settings are not fully customizable. I bought the Nad 760 because I wanted a not too expensive receiver with dolby digital and dts decoding for HT and very good music performance to listen to classical music. It has not dissapointed me, both in HT and music. However, my stereo integrated amplifier sounds a little better in music. It looks like the majority of receivers are not as good as dedicated components for serious music listening. But I don't mind using it instead of the stereo, the difference is not enough. I have listened to some dolby digital dvd's (no dts yet) and the sound is good. Good power despite it's 65 watt power rating. Not heard distortion yet (I am using soft clipping that it is supposed to prevent it). I think a big part of the good performance is the speakers I am using. In summary a good receiver. |
[Mar 24, 2001]
Sebastian
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sounds good in stereomode.
Weakness:
UGLY!!!!!! no matter how well it sounds I could only recommend it to blind people . Wish they could have spent at least ten dollars on the box. I bit weak (eventhough ratings are moderate). Just as bad and ugly remote. It stayed in the store. Why such an ugly box? If it was not for that, I would have bought it (at the price I was offered one). Here in europe they are reasonoble priced. But on the other side of the atlantic they are extremely overpriced. Those who paid the above listprice for it have been robbed. The low value grade is based on that (msrp) price. For the 400usd (3995 SKR)you can get it here I would have given the unit four stars. Similar Products Used: Denon, Sony which both had good looks and good sound. |
[Sep 23, 2000]
Duke
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Natural sound, tight clean bass, simple design, user friendly
Weakness:
Dolby Digital is auto, cannot manually switch. Remote is not very powerful. I just replace my 20 year old NAD intergrated amp/pre-amp and tuner combination along with a Sony EP9ES DD decoder for this unit. Thought the sound from the old system was good until when I brought the NAD T-760 home. WOW! Night and day! Nice thing about the T-760 is that it gives you all the pre-outs so you can connect external amps if needed. In my case, I have an oldie but goodie Proton AA-1200 power amp with 6dB of dynamic headroom. I connect this amp to the T-760 to drive my two front M&K satellite speakers. The main front amp from the T-760 drives my M&K 12" subwoofer (this sub also has its own 200 watts internal amp). The center channel and the rear surround speakers are all driven from the T-760. I've never heard my system sounds this good for almost 20 cotton pickin' years! Dialogue from the center speaker is loud and as distinctive as it can be. Rear surround is unbelieveable. Front left and right seperation from the M&K's are superb. Sound pressure from the M&K sub can be felt as if I were at Elton John concert! This T-760 makes my home theater entertainment a whole new experience again. |
[May 20, 2001]
Cory
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean looks & no unnecessary features - dts, dolby digital
Weakness:
No Dolby Digital 6.1; the remote leaves much to be desired I got the NAD 760 for $699 because the dealer said that NAD upgraded the style w/ the NAD 751 - he said there were no major differences except appearance. Even though the 761 is rated at 60w per channel its very conservative - the sound is very clean and revealing - you can tell the difference with high quality recorded music. The receiver has 3 digital inputs - two co-ax & one optical. Currently my setup is: Similar Products Used: None |
[Feb 28, 2001]
Torben
Audio Enthusiast
Look out folks, the Audioreview.com curmudgeon 'Darwin' is back... |